Skip to content

analyzer: void arrow functions should allow any rhs type #28940

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
floitschG opened this issue Mar 1, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

analyzer: void arrow functions should allow any rhs type #28940

floitschG opened this issue Mar 1, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. P2 A bug or feature request we're likely to work on type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior)
Milestone

Comments

@floitschG
Copy link
Contributor

This is the analyzer issue for #28939.

@floitschG floitschG added the legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. label Mar 1, 2017
@floitschG floitschG added this to the 1.23 milestone Mar 1, 2017
@bwilkerson bwilkerson added P2 A bug or feature request we're likely to work on type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior) labels Mar 9, 2017
@mit-mit mit-mit modified the milestones: 1.24, 1.23 Mar 15, 2017
@mit-mit
Copy link
Member

mit-mit commented Mar 15, 2017

Punting to 1.24 per dart-leads discussion.

@eernstg
Copy link
Member

eernstg commented May 10, 2017

Addressed by this CL.

@eernstg
Copy link
Member

eernstg commented May 11, 2017

Landed in 6cb0966.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. P2 A bug or feature request we're likely to work on type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants