Skip to content

hash_and_equals support for extension types #59247

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
Tracked by #58838
pq opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by dart-archive/linter#4673
Closed
Tracked by #58838

hash_and_equals support for extension types #59247

pq opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by dart-archive/linter#4673
Assignees
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. linter-new-language-feature linter-set-core

Comments

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Aug 11, 2023

No description provided.

@eernstg
Copy link
Member

eernstg commented Aug 11, 2023

(No-op? An extension type declaration cannot have members named == or hashCode.)

@pq
Copy link
Member Author

pq commented Aug 11, 2023

@eernstg: exactly right. I just want to make sure we don't overreport.

@eernstg
Copy link
Member

eernstg commented Aug 14, 2023

Ah, of course, I didn't think about that. Sorry about the noise. ;-)

@pq
Copy link
Member Author

pq commented Aug 14, 2023

Not noise at all. Any feedback is appreciated! (And to be fair, I could have added some context to the initial issue.)

@devoncarew devoncarew added devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. labels Nov 19, 2024
@devoncarew devoncarew transferred this issue from dart-archive/linter Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. linter-new-language-feature linter-set-core
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants