Skip to content

Conversation

@UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Jul 19, 2025

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Builds on top of #6767

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

n/a

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 23 milestone Jul 19, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 19, 2025

✅ No Merge Conflicts Detected

This PR currently has no conflicts with other open PRs.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has conflicts, please rebase.

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2025 15:12
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Walkthrough

This change set removes the CheckCbTxMerkleRoots function from both its implementation and header files, eliminating the direct Merkle root verification of quorum commitments in coinbase transactions from cbtx.cpp and cbtx.h. In specialtxman.cpp, the code refactors timing and benchmarking variables for special transaction processing, renames timing variables for clarity, and introduces new logic to calculate and verify the quorum Merkle root in coinbase transactions when applicable. Additional timing instrumentation is added around the new quorum Merkle root verification and existing chainlock checks, while no changes are made to public API signatures.

Estimated code review effort

2 (~15 minutes)


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f648039 and fc331e3.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/evo/cbtx.cpp (0 hunks)
  • src/evo/cbtx.h (0 hunks)
  • src/evo/specialtxman.cpp (2 hunks)
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/**/*.{cpp,h,cc,cxx,hpp}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CLAUDE.md)

src/**/*.{cpp,h,cc,cxx,hpp}: Dash Core C++ codebase must be written in C++20 and require at least Clang 16 or GCC 11.1
Dash uses unordered_lru_cache for efficient caching with LRU eviction

Files:

  • src/evo/specialtxman.cpp
src/{masternode,evo}/**/*.{cpp,h,cc,cxx,hpp}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CLAUDE.md)

Masternode lists must use immutable data structures (Immer library) for thread safety

Files:

  • src/evo/specialtxman.cpp
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: kwvg
PR: dashpay/dash#6543
File: src/wallet/receive.cpp:240-251
Timestamp: 2025-02-06T14:34:30.466Z
Learning: Pull request #6543 is focused on move-only changes and refactoring, specifically backporting from Bitcoin. Behavior changes should be proposed in separate PRs.
Learnt from: kwvg
PR: dashpay/dash#6718
File: test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py:2102-2102
Timestamp: 2025-06-09T16:43:20.996Z
Learning: In the test framework consolidation PR (#6718), user kwvg prefers to limit functional changes to those directly related to MasternodeInfo, avoiding scope creep even for minor improvements like error handling consistency.
Learnt from: knst
PR: dashpay/dash#6533
File: test/functional/feature_llmq_singlenode.py:98-106
Timestamp: 2025-01-22T08:33:31.405Z
Learning: When reviewing PRs, ensure that suggestions are directly related to the PR's primary objectives rather than general code improvements that could be addressed separately.
Learnt from: CR
PR: dashpay/dash#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T18:42:49.794Z
Learning: Applies to src/{crc32c,dashbls,gsl,immer,leveldb,minisketch,secp256k1,univalue}/** : Do not make changes under any circumstances to vendored dependencies in src/crc32c, src/dashbls, src/gsl, src/immer, src/leveldb, src/minisketch, src/secp256k1, src/univalue
src/evo/specialtxman.cpp (6)

Learnt from: kwvg
PR: #6718
File: test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py:2102-2102
Timestamp: 2025-06-09T16:43:20.996Z
Learning: In the test framework consolidation PR (#6718), user kwvg prefers to limit functional changes to those directly related to MasternodeInfo, avoiding scope creep even for minor improvements like error handling consistency.

Learnt from: CR
PR: dashpay/dash#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T18:42:49.794Z
Learning: Applies to src/evo/specialtx.h : Special transactions use payload extensions defined in src/evo/specialtx.h

Learnt from: kwvg
PR: #6543
File: src/wallet/receive.cpp:240-251
Timestamp: 2025-02-06T14:34:30.466Z
Learning: Pull request #6543 is focused on move-only changes and refactoring, specifically backporting from Bitcoin. Behavior changes should be proposed in separate PRs.

Learnt from: knst
PR: #6511
File: src/evo/deterministicmns.cpp:1369-1373
Timestamp: 2025-01-07T18:50:44.838Z
Learning: The functions MigrateDBIfNeeded and MigrateDBIfNeeded2 in src/evo/deterministicmns.cpp are temporary and will be removed in a future version. Refactoring suggestions for these functions should be avoided.

Learnt from: kwvg
PR: #6729
File: src/evo/deterministicmns.cpp:1313-1316
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T15:02:26.899Z
Learning: In Dash's masternode transaction validation, IsVersionChangeValid() is only called by transaction types that update existing masternode entries (like ProUpServTx, ProUpRegTx, ProUpRevTx), not by ProRegTx which creates new entries. This means validation logic in IsVersionChangeValid() only applies to the subset of transaction types that actually call it, not all masternode transaction types.

Learnt from: knst
PR: #6691
File: src/test/llmq_params_tests.cpp:148-151
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T14:53:04.819Z
Learning: In the Dash Core LLMQ implementation, signingActiveQuorumCount is never 0 in the actual parameters defined in params.h, making division by zero scenarios unrealistic in the max_cycles() function.

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • src/evo/cbtx.cpp
  • src/evo/cbtx.h
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
src/**/*.{cpp,h,cc,cxx,hpp}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CLAUDE.md)

src/**/*.{cpp,h,cc,cxx,hpp}: Dash Core C++ codebase must be written in C++20 and require at least Clang 16 or GCC 11.1
Dash uses unordered_lru_cache for efficient caching with LRU eviction

Files:

  • src/evo/specialtxman.cpp
src/{masternode,evo}/**/*.{cpp,h,cc,cxx,hpp}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CLAUDE.md)

Masternode lists must use immutable data structures (Immer library) for thread safety

Files:

  • src/evo/specialtxman.cpp
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: kwvg
PR: dashpay/dash#6543
File: src/wallet/receive.cpp:240-251
Timestamp: 2025-02-06T14:34:30.466Z
Learning: Pull request #6543 is focused on move-only changes and refactoring, specifically backporting from Bitcoin. Behavior changes should be proposed in separate PRs.
Learnt from: kwvg
PR: dashpay/dash#6718
File: test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py:2102-2102
Timestamp: 2025-06-09T16:43:20.996Z
Learning: In the test framework consolidation PR (#6718), user kwvg prefers to limit functional changes to those directly related to MasternodeInfo, avoiding scope creep even for minor improvements like error handling consistency.
Learnt from: knst
PR: dashpay/dash#6533
File: test/functional/feature_llmq_singlenode.py:98-106
Timestamp: 2025-01-22T08:33:31.405Z
Learning: When reviewing PRs, ensure that suggestions are directly related to the PR's primary objectives rather than general code improvements that could be addressed separately.
Learnt from: CR
PR: dashpay/dash#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T18:42:49.794Z
Learning: Applies to src/{crc32c,dashbls,gsl,immer,leveldb,minisketch,secp256k1,univalue}/** : Do not make changes under any circumstances to vendored dependencies in src/crc32c, src/dashbls, src/gsl, src/immer, src/leveldb, src/minisketch, src/secp256k1, src/univalue
src/evo/specialtxman.cpp (6)

Learnt from: kwvg
PR: #6718
File: test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py:2102-2102
Timestamp: 2025-06-09T16:43:20.996Z
Learning: In the test framework consolidation PR (#6718), user kwvg prefers to limit functional changes to those directly related to MasternodeInfo, avoiding scope creep even for minor improvements like error handling consistency.

Learnt from: CR
PR: dashpay/dash#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T18:42:49.794Z
Learning: Applies to src/evo/specialtx.h : Special transactions use payload extensions defined in src/evo/specialtx.h

Learnt from: kwvg
PR: #6543
File: src/wallet/receive.cpp:240-251
Timestamp: 2025-02-06T14:34:30.466Z
Learning: Pull request #6543 is focused on move-only changes and refactoring, specifically backporting from Bitcoin. Behavior changes should be proposed in separate PRs.

Learnt from: knst
PR: #6511
File: src/evo/deterministicmns.cpp:1369-1373
Timestamp: 2025-01-07T18:50:44.838Z
Learning: The functions MigrateDBIfNeeded and MigrateDBIfNeeded2 in src/evo/deterministicmns.cpp are temporary and will be removed in a future version. Refactoring suggestions for these functions should be avoided.

Learnt from: kwvg
PR: #6729
File: src/evo/deterministicmns.cpp:1313-1316
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T15:02:26.899Z
Learning: In Dash's masternode transaction validation, IsVersionChangeValid() is only called by transaction types that update existing masternode entries (like ProUpServTx, ProUpRegTx, ProUpRevTx), not by ProRegTx which creates new entries. This means validation logic in IsVersionChangeValid() only applies to the subset of transaction types that actually call it, not all masternode transaction types.

Learnt from: knst
PR: #6691
File: src/test/llmq_params_tests.cpp:148-151
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T14:53:04.819Z
Learning: In the Dash Core LLMQ implementation, signingActiveQuorumCount is never 0 in the actual parameters defined in params.h, making division by zero scenarios unrealistic in the max_cycles() function.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: linux64_ubsan-test / Test source
  • GitHub Check: linux64_tsan-test / Test source
  • GitHub Check: linux64_multiprocess-build / Build source
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/evo/specialtxman.cpp (8)

502-502: Good naming improvement for clarity.

Renaming nTimeMerkle to nTimeMerkleQuorums makes the timing variable's purpose more explicit and distinguishes it from the MN list merkle root timing.


604-606: Timing consolidation looks correct.

The timing variable consolidation maintains accurate timing measurements for the DMN manager processing while improving code organization.


609-621: Good variable naming and timing improvements.

The rename to calculatedMerkleRootMNL makes the variable's purpose explicit, and the timing measurements are correctly implemented to track the MN list merkle root calculation performance.


623-632: Correct inline implementation of quorum merkle root verification.

The logic correctly replaces the removed CheckCbTxMerkleRoots function by implementing the quorum merkle root verification inline. The version check, calculation, and comparison maintain the same validation behavior while improving code organization.


634-638: Proper timing instrumentation for the new inline logic.

The timing measurements correctly track the performance of the quorum merkle root verification that was moved inline, maintaining the same level of performance monitoring as before.


644-648: Correct timing update for chainlock processing.

The timing measurements are properly updated to maintain accurate performance tracking of the chainlock verification while fitting into the improved timing organization.


651-660: Timing consolidation maintains accuracy.

The timing variable updates for the MN hardfork manager processing maintain correct performance measurements while fitting into the improved timing organization structure.


502-660: Excellent refactoring that improves code organization and readability.

This refactoring successfully achieves the stated goal of improving ProcessSpecialTxsInBlock's readability by:

  1. Consolidating related logic: Moving quorum merkle root verification inline eliminates the need for a separate function and keeps related validation logic together
  2. Improving variable naming: Renaming nTimeMerkle to nTimeMerkleQuorums and calculatedMerkleRootMNL makes the code more self-documenting
  3. Better timing organization: Consolidating timing variables provides clearer performance tracking granularity
  4. Maintaining functionality: All validation behavior remains identical while improving code structure

The implementation correctly preserves all timing measurements and validation logic while making the code more maintainable.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK fc331e3

@knst knst requested a review from PastaPastaPasta July 31, 2025 15:31
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK fc331e3

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit 99731db into dashpay:develop Jul 31, 2025
31 of 34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants