-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
feat(sdk): add DataContractMismatch enum for detailed contract comparison #2648
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughA new enum, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Verifier
participant ContractA
participant ContractB
Verifier->>ContractA: Get serialized contract
Verifier->>ContractB: Get expected contract
Verifier->>ContractA: first_mismatch(ContractB)
alt Mismatch found
ContractA-->>Verifier: Some(DataContractMismatch)
Verifier-->>Verifier: Report error with mismatch details
else No mismatch
ContractA-->>Verifier: None
Verifier-->>Verifier: Continue processing
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs (1)
68-88
: Clear and correct Display implementation.The human-readable descriptions accurately represent each mismatch type.
Minor style alternative: You could eliminate the intermediate variable by directly matching in the
write!
macro:-impl fmt::Display for DataContractMismatch { - /// Formats the enum into a human-readable string describing the mismatch. - fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result { - let description = match self { - DataContractMismatch::Id => "ID fields differ", - // ... other matches - }; - write!(f, "{}", description) - } -} +impl fmt::Display for DataContractMismatch { + /// Formats the enum into a human-readable string describing the mismatch. + fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result { + write!(f, "{}", match self { + DataContractMismatch::Id => "ID fields differ", + // ... other matches + }) + } +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs
(4 hunks)packages/rs-drive/src/verify/state_transition/verify_state_transition_was_executed_with_proof/v0/mod.rs
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: QuantumExplorer
PR: dashpay/platform#2257
File: packages/rs-drive-abci/src/mimic/test_quorum.rs:159-164
Timestamp: 2024-11-20T16:16:01.830Z
Learning: QuantumExplorer prefers not to receive auto-generated messages asking to post on social media.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/rs-drive/src/verify/state_transition/verify_state_transition_was_executed_with_proof/v0/mod.rs (1)
packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs (1)
id
(105-110)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Check each feature
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Unused dependencies
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Unused dependencies
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Linting
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Tests
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Linting
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Unused dependencies
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Formatting
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Linting
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Tests
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Check each feature
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Tests
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Linting
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Unused dependencies
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Unused dependencies
- GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Linting
- GitHub Check: Build Docker images (DAPI, dapi, dapi) / Build DAPI image
- GitHub Check: Build Docker images (Dashmate helper, dashmate-helper, dashmate-helper) / Build Dashmate helper image
- GitHub Check: Build Docker images (Drive, drive, drive-abci) / Build Drive image
- GitHub Check: Build JS packages / Build JS
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs (2)
37-66
: Well-designed enum for detailed mismatch reporting.The
DataContractMismatch
enum comprehensively covers all possible mismatches between data contracts with clear documentation.
168-223
: Excellent implementation of detailed mismatch detection.The
first_mismatch
method efficiently identifies differences between contracts using an early-return pattern and provides specific mismatch information that significantly improves debugging capabilities compared to the previous boolean return.packages/rs-drive/src/verify/state_transition/verify_state_transition_was_executed_with_proof/v0/mod.rs (2)
84-88
: Improved error reporting for contract creation verification.The enhanced error message now includes specific mismatch details, significantly improving debugging capabilities when contract verification fails.
106-110
: Consistent error reporting enhancement for contract updates.The error handling for contract updates follows the same improved pattern as contract creation, maintaining consistency and providing detailed mismatch information.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Self Reviewed
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This update introduces a new
DataContractMismatch
enum to provide detailed information on mismatches betweenDataContractInSerializationFormat
instances.What was done?
DataContractMismatch
enum to represent different types of mismatches between data contracts.first_mismatch
method to return specific mismatches instead of a boolean.How Has This Been Tested?
Changes have been tested through existing unit tests that cover the contract comparison logic and state transition verification.
Breaking Changes
None
Checklist
For repository code-owners and collaborators only
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes