Skip to content

feat(sdk): add DataContractMismatch enum for detailed contract comparison #2648

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

QuantumExplorer
Copy link
Member

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer commented May 29, 2025

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

This update introduces a new DataContractMismatch enum to provide detailed information on mismatches between DataContractInSerializationFormat instances.

What was done?

  • Added the DataContractMismatch enum to represent different types of mismatches between data contracts.
  • Updated the first_mismatch method to return specific mismatches instead of a boolean.
  • Modified the error handling in the state transition verification to include mismatch details.
  • Keywords now compare case insensitive as platform will lowercase all keywords.

How Has This Been Tested?

Changes have been tested through existing unit tests that cover the contract comparison logic and state transition verification.

Breaking Changes

None

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have added ! to the title and described breaking changes in the corresponding section if my code contains any.

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error messages now specify the exact field where a data contract mismatch occurs during verification, making it easier to identify and resolve discrepancies.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved comparison logic for data contracts to provide more detailed feedback when differences are detected.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 29, 2025

Walkthrough

A new enum, DataContractMismatch, is introduced to represent specific differences between serialized data contracts. The equality comparison method is replaced with first_mismatch, which returns the first detected mismatch. Error reporting in state transition verification is updated to include detailed mismatch information, improving diagnostics without altering control flow.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs Added DataContractMismatch enum, its Display implementation, and replaced eq_without_auto_fields with first_mismatch for detailed contract comparison. Imports updated.
packages/rs-drive/src/verify/state_transition/verify_state_transition_was_executed_with_proof/v0/mod.rs Updated verification logic to use first_mismatch for contract comparison; error messages now include mismatch details.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Verifier
    participant ContractA
    participant ContractB

    Verifier->>ContractA: Get serialized contract
    Verifier->>ContractB: Get expected contract
    Verifier->>ContractA: first_mismatch(ContractB)
    alt Mismatch found
        ContractA-->>Verifier: Some(DataContractMismatch)
        Verifier-->>Verifier: Report error with mismatch details
    else No mismatch
        ContractA-->>Verifier: None
        Verifier-->>Verifier: Continue processing
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • lklimek

Poem

A contract checked, a mismatch found,
Now errors speak with details profound.
No more guessing why things fail—
The enum tells the precise tale!
With every hop and every leap,
The rabbit’s code grows strong and deep.
🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 417b4e0 and 42b9a63.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Linting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Tests
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Formatting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Unused dependencies
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Linting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Formatting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Tests
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Unused dependencies
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Linting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Check each feature
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Linting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Tests
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Formatting
  • GitHub Check: Build Docker images (DAPI, dapi, dapi) / Build DAPI image
  • GitHub Check: Build Docker images (Drive, drive, drive-abci) / Build Drive image
  • GitHub Check: Build Docker images (Dashmate helper, dashmate-helper, dashmate-helper) / Build Dashmate helper image
  • GitHub Check: Build JS packages / Build JS
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs (1)

68-88: Clear and correct Display implementation.

The human-readable descriptions accurately represent each mismatch type.

Minor style alternative: You could eliminate the intermediate variable by directly matching in the write! macro:

-impl fmt::Display for DataContractMismatch {
-    /// Formats the enum into a human-readable string describing the mismatch.
-    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
-        let description = match self {
-            DataContractMismatch::Id => "ID fields differ",
-            // ... other matches
-        };
-        write!(f, "{}", description)
-    }
-}
+impl fmt::Display for DataContractMismatch {
+    /// Formats the enum into a human-readable string describing the mismatch.
+    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
+        write!(f, "{}", match self {
+            DataContractMismatch::Id => "ID fields differ",
+            // ... other matches
+        })
+    }
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec63c33 and ebe90e2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs (4 hunks)
  • packages/rs-drive/src/verify/state_transition/verify_state_transition_was_executed_with_proof/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: QuantumExplorer
PR: dashpay/platform#2257
File: packages/rs-drive-abci/src/mimic/test_quorum.rs:159-164
Timestamp: 2024-11-20T16:16:01.830Z
Learning: QuantumExplorer prefers not to receive auto-generated messages asking to post on social media.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/rs-drive/src/verify/state_transition/verify_state_transition_was_executed_with_proof/v0/mod.rs (1)
packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs (1)
  • id (105-110)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Check each feature
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Unused dependencies
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Unused dependencies
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Linting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Tests
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Linting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Unused dependencies
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Formatting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Linting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (wasm-dpp) / Tests
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Check each feature
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Tests
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Linting
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dash-sdk) / Unused dependencies
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Unused dependencies
  • GitHub Check: Rust packages (dpp) / Linting
  • GitHub Check: Build Docker images (DAPI, dapi, dapi) / Build DAPI image
  • GitHub Check: Build Docker images (Dashmate helper, dashmate-helper, dashmate-helper) / Build Dashmate helper image
  • GitHub Check: Build Docker images (Drive, drive, drive-abci) / Build Drive image
  • GitHub Check: Build JS packages / Build JS
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/rs-dpp/src/data_contract/serialized_version/mod.rs (2)

37-66: Well-designed enum for detailed mismatch reporting.

The DataContractMismatch enum comprehensively covers all possible mismatches between data contracts with clear documentation.


168-223: Excellent implementation of detailed mismatch detection.

The first_mismatch method efficiently identifies differences between contracts using an early-return pattern and provides specific mismatch information that significantly improves debugging capabilities compared to the previous boolean return.

packages/rs-drive/src/verify/state_transition/verify_state_transition_was_executed_with_proof/v0/mod.rs (2)

84-88: Improved error reporting for contract creation verification.

The enhanced error message now includes specific mismatch details, significantly improving debugging capabilities when contract verification fails.


106-110: Consistent error reporting enhancement for contract updates.

The error handling for contract updates follows the same improved pattern as contract creation, maintaining consistency and providing detailed mismatch information.

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer changed the title feat: add DataContractMismatch enum for detailed contract comparison feat(sdk): add DataContractMismatch enum for detailed contract comparison May 29, 2025
Copy link
Member Author

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Self Reviewed

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer added this to the v2.0.0 milestone May 29, 2025
@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer merged commit 3b09052 into v2.0-dev May 29, 2025
68 checks passed
@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer deleted the featadd-data-contract-mismatch branch May 29, 2025 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants