DLPX-84995 NFSD: Never call nfsd_file_gc() in foreground paths #35
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
ahrens
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2023
pcd1193182
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2023
prakashsurya
approved these changes
Mar 16, 2023
don-brady
changed the title
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
prakashsurya
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 31, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
prakashsurya
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 20, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2023
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2032689 [ Upstream commit 2aaa8a1 ] With some IPv6 Ext Hdr (RPL, SRv6, etc.), we can send a packet that has the link-local address as src and dst IP and will be forwarded to an external IP in the IPv6 Ext Hdr. For example, the script below generates a packet whose src IP is the link-local address and dst is updated to 11::. # for f in $(find /proc/sys/net/ -name *seg6_enabled*); do echo 1 > $f; done # python3 >>> from socket import * >>> from scapy.all import * >>> >>> SRC_ADDR = DST_ADDR = "fe80::5054:ff:fe12:3456" >>> >>> pkt = IPv6(src=SRC_ADDR, dst=DST_ADDR) >>> pkt /= IPv6ExtHdrSegmentRouting(type=4, addresses=["11::", "22::"], segleft=1) >>> >>> sk = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW) >>> sk.sendto(bytes(pkt), (DST_ADDR, 0)) For such a packet, we call ip6_route_input() to look up a route for the next destination in these three functions depending on the header type. * ipv6_rthdr_rcv() * ipv6_rpl_srh_rcv() * ipv6_srh_rcv() If no route is found, ip6_null_entry is set to skb, and the following dst_input(skb) calls ip6_pkt_drop(). Finally, in icmp6_dev(), we dereference skb_rt6_info(skb)->rt6i_idev->dev as the input device is the loopback interface. Then, we have to check if skb_rt6_info(skb)->rt6i_idev is NULL or not to avoid NULL pointer deref for ip6_null_entry. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 157 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.4.0-11996-gb121d614371c #35 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:icmp6_send (net/ipv6/icmp.c:436 net/ipv6/icmp.c:503) Code: fe ff ff 48 c7 40 30 c0 86 5d 83 e8 c6 44 1c 00 e9 c8 fc ff ff 49 8b 46 58 48 83 e0 fe 0f 84 4a fb ff ff 48 8b 80 d0 00 00 00 <48> 8b 00 44 8b 88 e0 00 00 00 e9 34 fb ff ff 4d 85 ed 0f 85 69 01 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000003c70 EFLAGS: 00000286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00000000000000e0 RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff888006d72a18 RBP: ffffc90000003d80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffffc90000003d98 R11: 0000000000000040 R12: ffff888006d72a10 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8880057fb800 R15: ffffffff835d86c0 FS: 00007f9dc72ee740(0000) GS:ffff88807dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000057b2000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> ip6_pkt_drop (net/ipv6/route.c:4513) ipv6_rthdr_rcv (net/ipv6/exthdrs.c:640 net/ipv6/exthdrs.c:686) ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu (net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:437 (discriminator 5)) ip6_input_finish (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:483) __netif_receive_skb_one_core (net/core/dev.c:5455) process_backlog (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 net/core/dev.c:5895) __napi_poll (net/core/dev.c:6460) net_rx_action (net/core/dev.c:6529 net/core/dev.c:6660) __do_softirq (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 ./include/linux/jump_label.h:207 ./include/trace/events/irq.h:142 kernel/softirq.c:554) do_softirq (kernel/softirq.c:454 kernel/softirq.c:441) </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip (kernel/softirq.c:381) __dev_queue_xmit (net/core/dev.c:4231) ip6_finish_output2 (./include/net/neighbour.h:544 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:135) rawv6_sendmsg (./include/net/dst.h:458 ./include/linux/netfilter.h:303 net/ipv6/raw.c:656 net/ipv6/raw.c:914) sock_sendmsg (net/socket.c:725 net/socket.c:748) __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2134) __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2146 net/socket.c:2142 net/socket.c:2142) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) RIP: 0033:0x7f9dc751baea Code: d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b8 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 89 ca 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 15 b8 2c 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 7e c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 48 83 ec 30 44 89 RSP: 002b:00007ffe98712c38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe98712cf8 RCX: 00007f9dc751baea RDX: 0000000000000060 RSI: 00007f9dc6460b90 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007f9dc56e8be0 R08: 00007ffe98712d70 R09: 000000000000001c R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffffffc4653600 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007f9dc6af5d1b </TASK> Modules linked in: CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- RIP: 0010:icmp6_send (net/ipv6/icmp.c:436 net/ipv6/icmp.c:503) Code: fe ff ff 48 c7 40 30 c0 86 5d 83 e8 c6 44 1c 00 e9 c8 fc ff ff 49 8b 46 58 48 83 e0 fe 0f 84 4a fb ff ff 48 8b 80 d0 00 00 00 <48> 8b 00 44 8b 88 e0 00 00 00 e9 34 fb ff ff 4d 85 ed 0f 85 69 01 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000003c70 EFLAGS: 00000286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00000000000000e0 RDX: 0000000000000021 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff888006d72a18 RBP: ffffc90000003d80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffffc90000003d98 R11: 0000000000000040 R12: ffff888006d72a10 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8880057fb800 R15: ffffffff835d86c0 FS: 00007f9dc72ee740(0000) GS:ffff88807dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000057b2000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt Kernel Offset: disabled Fixes: 4832c30 ("net: ipv6: put host and anycast routes on device with address") Reported-by: Wang Yufen <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 9, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 10, 2023
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
jwk404
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
jwk404
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
jwk404
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
jwk404
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2024
When we are slave role and receives l2cap conn req when encryption has
started, we should check the enc key size to avoid KNOB attack or BLUFFS
attack.
From SIG recommendation, implementations are advised to reject
service-level connections on an encrypted baseband link with key
strengths below 7 octets.
A simple and clear way to achieve this is to place the enc key size
check in hci_cc_read_enc_key_size()
The btmon log below shows the case that lacks enc key size check.
> HCI Event: Connect Request (0x04) plen 10
Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Class: 0x480104
Major class: Computer (desktop, notebook, PDA, organizers)
Minor class: Desktop workstation
Capturing (Scanner, Microphone)
Telephony (Cordless telephony, Modem, Headset)
Link type: ACL (0x01)
< HCI Command: Accept Connection Request (0x01|0x0009) plen 7
Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Role: Peripheral (0x01)
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4
Accept Connection Request (0x01|0x0009) ncmd 2
Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Connect Complete (0x03) plen 11
Status: Success (0x00)
Handle: 1
Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Link type: ACL (0x01)
Encryption: Disabled (0x00)
...
> HCI Event: Encryption Change (0x08) plen 4
Status: Success (0x00)
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Encryption: Enabled with E0 (0x01)
< HCI Command: Read Encryption Key Size (0x05|0x0008) plen 2
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
> HCI Event: Command Complete (0x0e) plen 7
Read Encryption Key Size (0x05|0x0008) ncmd 2
Status: Success (0x00)
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Key size: 6
// We should check the enc key size
...
> ACL Data RX: Handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 12
L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 3 len 4
PSM: 25 (0x0019)
Source CID: 64
< ACL Data TX: Handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 16
L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 3 len 8
Destination CID: 64
Source CID: 64
Result: Connection pending (0x0001)
Status: Authorization pending (0x0002)
> HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5
Num handles: 1
Handle: 1 Address: BB:22:33:44:55:99 (OUI BB-22-33)
Count: 1
#35: len 16 (25 Kb/s)
Latency: 5 msec (2-7 msec ~4 msec)
< ACL Data TX: Handle 1 flags 0x00 dlen 16
L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 3 len 8
Destination CID: 64
Source CID: 64
Result: Connection successful (0x0000)
Status: No further information available (0x0000)
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alex Lu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Max Chou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
(backported from commit 04a342c)
[yuxuan.luo: manually backported. Renamed status to rp_status to avoid
name conflict with the function argument "status".
]
CVE-2023-24023
Signed-off-by: Yuxuan Luo <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jacob Martin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Roxana Nicolescu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
delphix-devops-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2024
The checks in nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() that directly invoke filecache garbage collection are intended to keep cache occupancy between a low- and high-watermark. The reason to limit the capacity of the filecache is to keep filecache lookups reasonably fast. However, invoking garbage collection at those points has some undesirable negative impacts. Files that are held open by NFSv4 clients often push the occupancy of the filecache over these watermarks. At that point: - Every call to nfsd_file_acquire() and nfsd_file_put() results in an LRU walk. This has the same effect on lookup latency as long chains in the hash table. - Garbage collection will then run on every nfsd thread, causing a lot of unnecessary lock contention. - Limiting cache capacity pushes out files used only by NFSv3 clients, which are the type of files the filecache is supposed to help. To address those negative impacts, remove the direct calls to the garbage collector.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
Recent escalations uncovered a bug in the NFS server file cache where lots of NFSv4 file opens causes the NFSD threads to consume a majority of CPU resources. This excessive kernel CPU consumption can cause the system to be non-responsive.
Problem
Per the upstream commit:
Solution
Pull in the upstream commit that stops calling nfsd_file_gc() inline for nfsd threads.
Testing Done
ab-pre-push: http://selfservice.jenkins.delphix.com/job/appliance-build-orchestrator-pre-push/4832/
Tested before/after with 17,000 opened files on a NFSv4 mount and ran a workload that cause lots of churn. For the before case, a 30 second kernel profile has NFSD using 36% CPU, whereas for the fixed kernel it is only using 6% CPU
Before:
With the fix:
Future Work
There are additional upstream fixes in this problem space that would require refactoring to bring in since they are based off of a 6.1 kernel and we currently are running 5.4 kernels.