Skip to content

DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exhausted #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2021
Merged

DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exhausted #3

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2021

Conversation

don-brady
Copy link
Contributor

@don-brady don-brady commented Feb 22, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Description

During a server restart, nfsd attempts to allocates 100K of contiguous kernel memory (aka an order-5 allocation). During busy workloads, there can be periods where no order-5 allocations are available. If this coincides with a nfs-server restart request, then the server will fail to start and be left in an inactive state.

This change remedies the problem by changing the nfsd allocation to not require contiguous memory (as is done elsewhere in the nfsd module).

Testing

appliance-build-orchestrator
http://selfservice.jenkins.delphix.com/job/devops-gate/job/master/job/appliance-build-orchestrator-pre-push/4781/

Confirmed that the fix was in place in a generated AB image (bpftrace probes that observes that nfsd_file_cache_init no longer attempts order-5 allocations).

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces:

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other (please describe):

Other information

Note this is a clean cherry-pick from HF-984.

Other kernel flavors of this change

delphix/linux-kernel-generic#4
delphix/linux-kernel-aws#3
delphix/linux-kernel-gcp#3
delphix/linux-kernel-oracle#3

This was referenced Feb 25, 2021
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
@don-brady don-brady merged commit 855bb95 into delphix:master Feb 26, 2021
jwk404 pushed a commit to jwk404/linux-kernel-azure that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2021
@jwk404
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
80ce098 
…usted (delphix#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
4e62d06 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2021
@ethanwu-syno @ksacilotto
btrfs: backref, use correct count to resolve normal data refs
45ff21d 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916061

commit b25b0b8 upstream.

With the following patches:

- btrfs: backref, only collect file extent items matching backref offset
- btrfs: backref, not adding refs from shared block when resolving normal backref
- btrfs: backref, only search backref entries from leaves of the same root

we only collect the normal data refs we want, so the imprecise upper
bound total_refs of that EXTENT_ITEM could now be changed to the count
of the normal backref entry we want to search.

Background and how the patches fit together:

Btrfs has two types of data backref.
For BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_REF_KEY type of backref, we don't have the
exact block number. Therefore, we need to call resolve_indirect_refs.
It uses btrfs_search_slot to locate the leaf block. Then
we need to walk through the leaves to search for the EXTENT_DATA items
that have disk bytenr matching the extent item (add_all_parents).

When resolving indirect refs, we could take entries that don't
belong to the backref entry we are searching for right now.
For that reason when searching backref entry, we always use total
refs of that EXTENT_ITEM rather than individual count.

For example:
item 11 key (40831553536 EXTENT_ITEM 4194304) itemoff 15460 itemsize
  extent refs 24 gen 7302 flags DATA
  shared data backref parent 394985472 count 10 #1
  extent data backref root 257 objectid 260 offset 1048576 count 3 #2
  extent data backref root 256 objectid 260 offset 65536 count 6 #3
  extent data backref root 257 objectid 260 offset 65536 count 5 #4

For example, when searching backref entry #4, we'll use total_refs
24, a very loose loop ending condition, instead of total_refs = 5.

But using total_refs = 24 is not accurate. Sometimes, we'll never find
all the refs from specific root.  As a result, the loop keeps on going
until we reach the end of that inode.

The first 3 patches, handle 3 different types refs we might encounter.
These refs do not belong to the normal backref we are searching, and
hence need to be skipped.

This patch changes the total_refs to correct number so that we could
end loop as soon as we find all the refs we want.

btrfs send uses backref to find possible clone sources, the following
is a simple test to compare the results with and without this patch:

 $ btrfs subvolume create /sub1
 $ for i in `seq 1 163840`; do
     dd if=/dev/zero of=/sub1/file bs=64K count=1 seek=$((i-1)) conv=notrunc oflag=direct
   done
 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot /sub1 /sub2
 $ for i in `seq 1 163840`; do
     dd if=/dev/zero of=/sub1/file bs=4K count=1 seek=$(((i-1)*16+10)) conv=notrunc oflag=direct
   done
 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /sub1 /snap1
 $ time btrfs send /snap1 | btrfs receive /volume2

Without this patch:

real 69m48.124s
user 0m50.199s
sys  70m15.600s

With this patch:

real    1m59.683s
user    0m35.421s
sys     2m42.684s

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ethanwu <[email protected]>
[ add patchset cover letter with background and numbers ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
16f0f7b 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
3d41699 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2021
@namhyung @ksacilotto
perf test: Fix unaligned access in sample parsing test
4a25f0b 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1918974

[ Upstream commit c5c97ca ]

The ubsan reported the following error.  It was because sample's raw
data missed u32 padding at the end.  So it broke the alignment of the
array after it.

The raw data contains an u32 size prefix so the data size should have
an u32 padding after 8-byte aligned data.

27: Sample parsing  :util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4:
  runtime error: store to misaligned address 0x62100006b9bc for type
  '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long'), which requires 8 byte alignment
0x62100006b9bc: note: pointer points here
  00 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff  ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff  ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff  ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
              ^
    #0 0x561532a9fc96 in perf_event__synthesize_sample util/synthetic-events.c:1539:13
    #1 0x5615327f4a4f in do_test tests/sample-parsing.c:284:8
    #2 0x5615327f3f50 in test__sample_parsing tests/sample-parsing.c:381:9
    #3 0x56153279d3a1 in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:424:9
    #4 0x56153279c836 in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:454:9
    #5 0x56153279b7eb in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:675:4
    #6 0x56153279abf0 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:821:9
    #7 0x56153264e796 in run_builtin perf.c:312:11
    #8 0x56153264cf03 in handle_internal_command perf.c:364:8
    #9 0x56153264e47d in run_argv perf.c:408:2
    #10 0x56153264c9a9 in main perf.c:538:3
    #11 0x7f137ab6fbbc in __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x38bbc)
    #12 0x561532596828 in _start ...

SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: misaligned-pointer-use
 util/synthetic-events.c:1539:4 in

Fixes: 045f8cd ("perf tests: Add a sample parsing test")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kelsey Skunberg <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2021
@ksacilotto
drm/hisilicon: Fix use-after-free
ffe1639 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920235

[ Upstream commit c855af2 ]

Fix the problem of dev being released twice.
------------[ cut here ]------------
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 75 PID: 15700 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xd4/0x150
CPU: 75 PID: 15700 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G            E     5.10.0-rc3+ #3
Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 200 (Model 2280)/BC82AMDDA, BIOS 0.88 07/24/2019
pstate: 40400009 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
pc : refcount_warn_saturate+0xd4/0x150
lr : refcount_warn_saturate+0xd4/0x150
sp : ffff2028150cbc00
x29: ffff2028150cbc00 x28: ffff2028150121c0
x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000003
x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffff2028150cbc90
x21: ffff2020038a30a8 x20: ffff2028150cbc90
x19: ffff0020cd938020 x18: 0000000000000010
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: ffff2028950cb88f
x13: ffff2028150cb89d x12: 0000000000000000
x11: 0000000005f5e0ff x10: ffff2028150cb800
x9 : 00000000ffffffd0 x8 : 75203b776f6c6672
x7 : ffff800011a6f7c8 x6 : 0000000000000001
x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffff202ffe2f9dc0
x1 : ffffa02fecf40000 x0 : 0000000000000026
Call trace:
 refcount_warn_saturate+0xd4/0x150
 devm_drm_dev_init_release+0x50/0x70
 devm_action_release+0x20/0x30
 release_nodes+0x13c/0x218
 devres_release_all+0x80/0x170
 device_release_driver_internal+0x128/0x1f0
 driver_detach+0x6c/0xe0
 bus_remove_driver+0x74/0x100
 driver_unregister+0x34/0x60
 pci_unregister_driver+0x24/0xd8
 hibmc_pci_driver_exit+0x14/0xe858 [hibmc_drm]
 __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x1fc/0x2d0
 el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x188
 do_el0_svc+0x80/0xa0
 el0_sync_handler+0x8c/0xb0
 el0_sync+0x15c/0x180
CPU: 75 PID: 15700 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G            E     5.10.0-rc3+ #3
Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 200 (Model 2280)/BC82AMDDA, BIOS 0.88 07/24/2019
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0x0/0x208
 show_stack+0x2c/0x40
 dump_stack+0xd8/0x10c
 __warn+0xac/0x128
 report_bug+0xcc/0x180
 bug_handler+0x24/0x78
 call_break_hook+0x80/0xa0
 brk_handler+0x28/0x68
 do_debug_exception+0x9c/0x148
 el1_sync_handler+0x7c/0x128
 el1_sync+0x80/0x100
 refcount_warn_saturate+0xd4/0x150
 devm_drm_dev_init_release+0x50/0x70
 devm_action_release+0x20/0x30
 release_nodes+0x13c/0x218
 devres_release_all+0x80/0x170
 device_release_driver_internal+0x128/0x1f0
 driver_detach+0x6c/0xe0
 bus_remove_driver+0x74/0x100
 driver_unregister+0x34/0x60
 pci_unregister_driver+0x24/0xd8
 hibmc_pci_driver_exit+0x14/0xe858 [hibmc_drm]
 __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x1fc/0x2d0
 el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x188
 do_el0_svc+0x80/0xa0
 el0_sync_handler+0x8c/0xb0
 el0_sync+0x15c/0x180
---[ end trace 00718630d6e5ff18 ]---

Signed-off-by: Tian Tao <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kelsey Skunberg <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
7317131 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
1f8de50 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
2a2f55d 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2021
@Wengang-oracle @smb49
ocfs2: fix deadlock between setattr and dio_end_io_write
33eb5f4 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926489

commit 90bd070 upstream.

The following deadlock is detected:

  truncate -> setattr path is waiting for pending direct IO to be done (inode->i_dio_count become zero) with inode->i_rwsem held (down_write).

  PID: 14827  TASK: ffff881686a9af80  CPU: 20  COMMAND: "ora_p005_hrltd9"
   #0  __schedule at ffffffff818667cc
   #1  schedule at ffffffff81866de6
   #2  inode_dio_wait at ffffffff812a2d04
   #3  ocfs2_setattr at ffffffffc05f322e [ocfs2]
   #4  notify_change at ffffffff812a5a09
   #5  do_truncate at ffffffff812808f5
   #6  do_sys_ftruncate.constprop.18 at ffffffff81280cf2
   #7  sys_ftruncate at ffffffff81280d8e
   #8  do_syscall_64 at ffffffff81003949
   #9  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff81a001ad

dio completion path is going to complete one direct IO (decrement
inode->i_dio_count), but before that it hung at locking inode->i_rwsem:

   #0  __schedule+700 at ffffffff818667cc
   #1  schedule+54 at ffffffff81866de6
   #2  rwsem_down_write_failed+536 at ffffffff8186aa28
   #3  call_rwsem_down_write_failed+23 at ffffffff8185a1b7
   #4  down_write+45 at ffffffff81869c9d
   #5  ocfs2_dio_end_io_write+180 at ffffffffc05d5444 [ocfs2]
   #6  ocfs2_dio_end_io+85 at ffffffffc05d5a85 [ocfs2]
   #7  dio_complete+140 at ffffffff812c873c
   #8  dio_aio_complete_work+25 at ffffffff812c89f9
   #9  process_one_work+361 at ffffffff810b1889
  #10  worker_thread+77 at ffffffff810b233d
  #11  kthread+261 at ffffffff810b7fd5
  #12  ret_from_fork+62 at ffffffff81a0035e

Thus above forms ABBA deadlock.  The same deadlock was mentioned in
upstream commit 28f5a8a ("ocfs2: should wait dio before inode lock
in ocfs2_setattr()").  It seems that that commit only removed the
cluster lock (the victim of above dead lock) from the ABBA deadlock
party.

End-user visible effects: Process hang in truncate -> ocfs2_setattr path
and other processes hang at ocfs2_dio_end_io_write path.

This is to fix the deadlock itself.  It removes inode_lock() call from
dio completion path to remove the deadlock and add ip_alloc_sem lock in
setattr path to synchronize the inode modifications.

[[email protected]: remove the "had_alloc_lock" as suggested]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]>
Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]>
Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]>
Cc: Gang He <[email protected]>
Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 6, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
2dc0ab1 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
ff87f1f 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2021
@sagigrimberg @ksacilotto
nvmet-tcp: fix incorrect locking in state_change sk callback
dfdcc08 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929615

[ Upstream commit b5332a9 ]

We are not changing anything in the TCP connection state so
we should not take a write_lock but rather a read lock.

This caused a deadlock when running nvmet-tcp and nvme-tcp
on the same system, where state_change callbacks on the
host and on the controller side have causal relationship
and made lockdep report on this with blktests:

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.12.0-rc3 #1 Tainted: G          I
--------------------------------
inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-R} usage.
nvme/1324 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
ffff888363151000 (clock-AF_INET){++-?}-{2:2}, at: nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp]
{IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
  __lock_acquire+0x79b/0x18d0
  lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x480
  _raw_write_lock_bh+0x39/0x80
  nvmet_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x170 [nvmet_tcp]
  tcp_fin+0x2a8/0x780
  tcp_data_queue+0xf94/0x1f20
  tcp_rcv_established+0x6ba/0x1f00
  tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x502/0x760
  tcp_v4_rcv+0x257e/0x3430
  ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x69/0x6a0
  ip_local_deliver_finish+0x1e2/0x2f0
  ip_local_deliver+0x1a2/0x420
  ip_rcv+0x4fb/0x6b0
  __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x162/0x1b0
  process_backlog+0x1ff/0x770
  __napi_poll.constprop.0+0xa9/0x5c0
  net_rx_action+0x7b3/0xb30
  __do_softirq+0x1f0/0x940
  do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0
  __local_bh_enable_ip+0xd8/0x100
  ip_finish_output2+0x6b7/0x18a0
  __ip_queue_xmit+0x706/0x1aa0
  __tcp_transmit_skb+0x2068/0x2e20
  tcp_write_xmit+0xc9e/0x2bb0
  __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x92/0x310
  inet_shutdown+0x158/0x300
  __nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x36/0x270 [nvme_tcp]
  nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x87/0xb0 [nvme_tcp]
  nvme_tcp_teardown_admin_queue+0x69/0xe0 [nvme_tcp]
  nvme_do_delete_ctrl+0x100/0x10c [nvme_core]
  nvme_sysfs_delete.cold+0x8/0xd [nvme_core]
  kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c7/0x460
  new_sync_write+0x36c/0x610
  vfs_write+0x5c0/0x870
  ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0
  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
irq event stamp: 10687
hardirqs last  enabled at (10687): [<ffffffff9ec376bd>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x40
hardirqs last disabled at (10686): [<ffffffff9ec374d8>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x68/0x90
softirqs last  enabled at (10684): [<ffffffff9f000608>] __do_softirq+0x608/0x940
softirqs last disabled at (10649): [<ffffffff9cdedd31>] do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(clock-AF_INET);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(clock-AF_INET);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

5 locks held by nvme/1324:
 #0: ffff8884a01fe470 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0
 #1: ffff8886e435c090 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x216/0x460
 #2: ffff888104d90c38 (kn->active#255){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_remove_self+0x22d/0x330
 #3: ffff8884634538d0 (&queue->queue_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x52/0xb0 [nvme_tcp]
 #4: ffff888363150d30 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: inet_shutdown+0x59/0x300

stack backtrace:
CPU: 26 PID: 1324 Comm: nvme Tainted: G          I       5.12.0-rc3 #1
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/06NR82, BIOS 2.10.0 11/12/2020
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x93/0xc2
 mark_lock_irq.cold+0x2c/0xb3
 ? verify_lock_unused+0x390/0x390
 ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x160/0x160
 ? lock_downgrade+0x100/0x100
 ? save_trace+0x88/0x5e0
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x40
 mark_lock+0x530/0x1470
 ? mark_lock_irq+0x1d10/0x1d10
 ? enqueue_timer+0x660/0x660
 mark_usage+0x215/0x2a0
 __lock_acquire+0x79b/0x18d0
 ? tcp_schedule_loss_probe.part.0+0x38c/0x520
 lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x480
 ? nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp]
 ? rcu_read_unlock+0x40/0x40
 ? tcp_mtu_probe+0x1ae0/0x1ae0
 ? kmalloc_reserve+0xa0/0xa0
 ? sysfs_file_ops+0x170/0x170
 _raw_read_lock+0x3d/0xa0
 ? nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp]
 nvme_tcp_state_change+0x21/0x150 [nvme_tcp]
 ? sysfs_file_ops+0x170/0x170
 inet_shutdown+0x189/0x300
 __nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x36/0x270 [nvme_tcp]
 nvme_tcp_stop_queue+0x87/0xb0 [nvme_tcp]
 nvme_tcp_teardown_admin_queue+0x69/0xe0 [nvme_tcp]
 nvme_do_delete_ctrl+0x100/0x10c [nvme_core]
 nvme_sysfs_delete.cold+0x8/0xd [nvme_core]
 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x2c7/0x460
 new_sync_write+0x36c/0x610
 ? new_sync_read+0x600/0x600
 ? lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x480
 ? rcu_read_unlock+0x40/0x40
 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9a/0x110
 vfs_write+0x5c0/0x870
 ksys_write+0xf9/0x1d0
 ? __ia32_sys_read+0xa0/0xa0
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x198/0x340
 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x27/0x70
 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Fixes: 872d26a ("nvmet-tcp: add NVMe over TCP target driver")
Reported-by: Yi Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2021
@ksacilotto
bnxt_en: Fix RX consumer index logic in the error path.
503fa87 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929615

[ Upstream commit bbd6f0a ]

In bnxt_rx_pkt(), the RX buffers are expected to complete in order.
If the RX consumer index indicates an out of order buffer completion,
it means we are hitting a hardware bug and the driver will abort all
remaining RX packets and reset the RX ring.  The RX consumer index
that we pass to bnxt_discard_rx() is not correct.  We should be
passing the current index (tmp_raw_cons) instead of the old index
(raw_cons).  This bug can cause us to be at the wrong index when
trying to abort the next RX packet.  It can crash like this:

 #0 [ffff9bbcdf5c39a8] machine_kexec at ffffffff9b05e007
 #1 [ffff9bbcdf5c3a00] __crash_kexec at ffffffff9b111232
 #2 [ffff9bbcdf5c3ad0] panic at ffffffff9b07d61e
 #3 [ffff9bbcdf5c3b50] oops_end at ffffffff9b030978
 #4 [ffff9bbcdf5c3b78] no_context at ffffffff9b06aaf0
 #5 [ffff9bbcdf5c3bd8] __bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff9b06ae2e
 #6 [ffff9bbcdf5c3c28] bad_area_nosemaphore at ffffffff9b06af24
 #7 [ffff9bbcdf5c3c38] __do_page_fault at ffffffff9b06b67e
 #8 [ffff9bbcdf5c3cb0] do_page_fault at ffffffff9b06bb12
 #9 [ffff9bbcdf5c3ce0] page_fault at ffffffff9bc015c5
    [exception RIP: bnxt_rx_pkt+237]
    RIP: ffffffffc0259cdd  RSP: ffff9bbcdf5c3d98  RFLAGS: 00010213
    RAX: 000000005dd8097f  RBX: ffff9ba4cb11b7e0  RCX: ffffa923cf6e9000
    RDX: 0000000000000fff  RSI: 0000000000000627  RDI: 0000000000001000
    RBP: ffff9bbcdf5c3e60   R8: 0000000000420003   R9: 000000000000020d
    R10: ffffa923cf6ec138  R11: ffff9bbcdf5c3e83  R12: ffff9ba4d6f928c0
    R13: ffff9ba4cac28080  R14: ffff9ba4cb11b7f0  R15: ffff9ba4d5a30000
    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018

Fixes: a1b0e4e ("bnxt_en: Improve RX consumer index validity check.")
Reviewed-by: Pavan Chebbi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andy Gospodarek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
ee44dd1 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2021
@pzakha
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
2e2e981 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
baa34e1 
…usted (#3)
pzakha pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2021
@pzakha
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
58ce9cf 
…usted (#3)
pzakha pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2021
@pzakha
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
53145d9 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2021
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
2d29a5c 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2021
@fbq @smb49
lockding/lockdep: Avoid to find wrong lock dep path in check_irq_usage()
a5ba0c0 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938199

[ Upstream commit 7b1f8c6 ]

In the step #3 of check_irq_usage(), we seach backwards to find a lock
whose usage conflicts the usage of @target_entry1 on safe/unsafe.
However, we should only keep the irq-unsafe usage of @target_entry1 into
consideration, because it could be a case where a lock is hardirq-unsafe
but soft-safe, and in check_irq_usage() we find it because its
hardirq-unsafe could result into a hardirq-safe-unsafe deadlock, but
currently since we don't filter out the other usage bits, so we may find
a lock dependency path softirq-unsafe -> softirq-safe, which in fact
doesn't cause a deadlock. And this may cause misleading lockdep splats.

Fix this by only keeping LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_ALL bits when we try the
backwards search.

Reported-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
jwk404 pushed a commit to jwk404/linux-kernel-azure that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2024
@jwk404
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
23700bf 
…usted (delphix#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2024
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
815e8f3 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
7394aba 
…usted (#3)
jwk404 pushed a commit to jwk404/linux-kernel-azure that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
@jwk404
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
feefce0 
…usted (delphix#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
1ad3cb4 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
e7aa90c 
…usted (#3)
jwk404 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
@jwk404
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
4d8b535 
…usted (#3)
jwk404 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2024
@jwk404
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
23bdf69 
…usted (#3)
jwk404 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2024
@jwk404
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
74826fa 
…usted (#3)
jwk404 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
@jwk404
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
d064cc1 
…usted (#3)
jwk404 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
@jwk404
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
2ce4bb3 
…usted (#3)
jwk404 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
@jwk404
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
28bf444 
…usted (#3)
jwk404 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
@jwk404
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
f6f16e8 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2024
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
3e891d1 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
@f0rm2l1n @smb49
ksmbd: fix global oob in ksmbd_nl_policy
2fc956f 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059014

[ Upstream commit ebeae8a ]

Similar to a reported issue (check the commit b33fb5b ("net:
qualcomm: rmnet: fix global oob in rmnet_policy"), my local fuzzer finds
another global out-of-bounds read for policy ksmbd_nl_policy. See bug
trace below:

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in validate_nla lib/nlattr.c:386 [inline]
BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in __nla_validate_parse+0x24af/0x2750 lib/nlattr.c:600
Read of size 1 at addr ffffffff8f24b100 by task syz-executor.1/62810

CPU: 0 PID: 62810 Comm: syz-executor.1 Tainted: G                 N 6.1.0 #3
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x8b/0xb3 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:284 [inline]
 print_report+0x172/0x475 mm/kasan/report.c:395
 kasan_report+0xbb/0x1c0 mm/kasan/report.c:495
 validate_nla lib/nlattr.c:386 [inline]
 __nla_validate_parse+0x24af/0x2750 lib/nlattr.c:600
 __nla_parse+0x3e/0x50 lib/nlattr.c:697
 __nlmsg_parse include/net/netlink.h:748 [inline]
 genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse.constprop.0+0x1b0/0x290 net/netlink/genetlink.c:565
 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xda/0x330 net/netlink/genetlink.c:734
 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:833 [inline]
 genl_rcv_msg+0x441/0x780 net/netlink/genetlink.c:850
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x14f/0x410 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540
 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:861
 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 [inline]
 netlink_unicast+0x54e/0x800 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
 netlink_sendmsg+0x930/0xe50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline]
 sock_sendmsg+0x154/0x190 net/socket.c:734
 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6df/0x840 net/socket.c:2482
 ___sys_sendmsg+0x110/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2536
 __sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x1c0 net/socket.c:2565
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fdd66a8f359
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fdd65e00168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fdd66bbcf80 RCX: 00007fdd66a8f359
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000500 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fdd66ada493 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffc84b81aff R14: 00007fdd65e00300 R15: 0000000000022000
 </TASK>

The buggy address belongs to the variable:
 ksmbd_nl_policy+0x100/0xa80

The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
page:0000000034f47940 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1ccc4b
flags: 0x200000000001000(reserved|node=0|zone=2)
raw: 0200000000001000 ffffea00073312c8 ffffea00073312c8 0000000000000000
raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

Memory state around the buggy address:
 ffffffff8f24b000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 ffffffff8f24b080: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>ffffffff8f24b100: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 07 f9
                   ^
 ffffffff8f24b180: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 05 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 05
 ffffffff8f24b200: f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 03 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 04 f9
==================================================================

To fix it, add a placeholder named __KSMBD_EVENT_MAX and let
KSMBD_EVENT_MAX to be its original value - 1 according to what other
netlink families do. Also change two sites that refer the
KSMBD_EVENT_MAX to correct value.

Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 0626e66 ("cifsd: add server handler for central processing and tranport layers")
Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
@smb49
libbpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in bpf_object__collect_prog_relos
9110d76 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059014

[ Upstream commit fc3a553 ]

An issue occurred while reading an ELF file in libbpf.c during fuzzing:

	Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
	0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206
	4206 in libbpf.c
	(gdb) bt
	#0 0x0000000000958e97 in bpf_object.collect_prog_relos () at libbpf.c:4206
	#1 0x000000000094f9d6 in bpf_object.collect_relos () at libbpf.c:6706
	#2 0x000000000092bef3 in bpf_object_open () at libbpf.c:7437
	#3 0x000000000092c046 in bpf_object.open_mem () at libbpf.c:7497
	#4 0x0000000000924afa in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput () at fuzz/bpf-object-fuzzer.c:16
	#5 0x000000000060be11 in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::Fuzzer::run_one ()
	#6 0x000000000087ad92 in tracing::span::Span::in_scope ()
	#7 0x00000000006078aa in testblitz_engine::fuzzer::util::walkdir ()
	#8 0x00000000005f3217 in testblitz_engine::entrypoint::main::{{closure}} ()
	#9 0x00000000005f2601 in main ()
	(gdb)

scn_data was null at this code(tools/lib/bpf/src/libbpf.c):

	if (rel->r_offset % BPF_INSN_SZ || rel->r_offset >= scn_data->d_size) {

The scn_data is derived from the code above:

	scn = elf_sec_by_idx(obj, sec_idx);
	scn_data = elf_sec_data(obj, scn);

	relo_sec_name = elf_sec_str(obj, shdr->sh_name);
	sec_name = elf_sec_name(obj, scn);
	if (!relo_sec_name || !sec_name)// don't check whether scn_data is NULL
		return -EINVAL;

In certain special scenarios, such as reading a malformed ELF file,
it is possible that scn_data may be a null pointer

Signed-off-by: Mingyi Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xin Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Changye Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manuel Diewald <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
8a2ccaa 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2024
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
c9beaaf 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2024
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
3b672ad 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2024
@manoj-joseph
DLPX-74216 nfs-server restarts fail when order-5 allocations are exha…
7a3f365 
…usted (#3)
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
@fdmanana @smb49
btrfs: use NOFS context when getting inodes during logging and log re…
43d623d 
…play

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076435

[ Upstream commit d182575 ]

During inode logging (and log replay too), we are holding a transaction
handle and we often need to call btrfs_iget(), which will read an inode
from its subvolume btree if it's not loaded in memory and that results in
allocating an inode with GFP_KERNEL semantics at the btrfs_alloc_inode()
callback - and this may recurse into the filesystem in case we are under
memory pressure and attempt to commit the current transaction, resulting
in a deadlock since the logging (or log replay) task is holding a
transaction handle open.

Syzbot reported this with the following stack traces:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor.1/9919 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
         __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
         btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481
         btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x8cb/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7079
         btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
         btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
         vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
         generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
         btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
         new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
         vfs_write+0x6b6/0x1140 fs/read_write.c:590
         ksys_write+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643
         do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  -> #2 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}:
         join_transaction+0x164/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:315
         start_transaction+0x427/0x1a70 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:700
         btrfs_commit_super+0xa1/0x110 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4170
         close_ctree+0xcb0/0xf90 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4324
         generic_shutdown_super+0x159/0x3d0 fs/super.c:642
         kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 fs/super.c:1226
         btrfs_kill_super+0x3b/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2096
         deactivate_locked_super+0xbe/0x1a0 fs/super.c:473
         deactivate_super+0xde/0x100 fs/super.c:506
         cleanup_mnt+0x222/0x450 fs/namespace.c:1267
         task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:180
         resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
         exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
         exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
         __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
         syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x278/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x80/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:389
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  -> #1 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}:
         __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5468 [inline]
         lock_release+0x33e/0x6c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5774
         percpu_up_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:99 [inline]
         __sb_end_write include/linux/fs.h:1650 [inline]
         sb_end_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1767 [inline]
         __btrfs_end_transaction+0x5ca/0x920 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1071
         btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x228/0x330 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301
         btrfs_evict_inode+0x960/0xe80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5291
         evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667
         iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
         iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
         iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
         dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400
         __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603
         dput.part.0+0x4b1/0x9b0 fs/dcache.c:845
         dput+0x1f/0x30 fs/dcache.c:835
         ovl_stack_put+0x60/0x90 fs/overlayfs/util.c:132
         ovl_destroy_inode+0xc6/0x190 fs/overlayfs/super.c:182
         destroy_inode+0xc4/0x1b0 fs/inode.c:311
         iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
         iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
         iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
         dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400
         __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603
         shrink_kill fs/dcache.c:1048 [inline]
         shrink_dentry_list+0x140/0x5d0 fs/dcache.c:1075
         prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1156
         super_cache_scan+0x32a/0x550 fs/super.c:221
         do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435
         shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
         shrink_slab+0xa87/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:626
         shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4790
         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4851 [inline]
         lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4951
         shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5910 [inline]
         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6720 [inline]
         balance_pgdat+0x1105/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6911
         kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7180
         kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389
         ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

  -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
         validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
         __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
         lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
         lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
         __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
         fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
         might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
         slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
         slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
         kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020
         btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411
         alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261
         iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline]
         iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228
         btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline]
         btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline]
         btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636
         add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline]
         copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928
         btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592
         log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline]
         btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718
         btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline]
         btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141
         btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
         btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
         vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
         generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
         btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
         do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741
         vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971
         do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
         __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline]
         __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline]
         __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210
         do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    fs_reclaim --> btrfs_trans_num_extwriters --> &ei->log_mutex

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(&ei->log_mutex);
                                 lock(btrfs_trans_num_extwriters);
                                 lock(&ei->log_mutex);
    lock(fs_reclaim);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  7 locks held by syz-executor.1/9919:
   #0: ffff88802be20420 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
   #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
   #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xc8/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:385
   #2: ffff888065c0f778 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xee/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:388
   #3: ffff88802be20610 (sb_internal#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_sync_file+0x95b/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1952
   #4: ffff8880546323f0 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290
   #5: ffff888054632418 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290
   #6: ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 PID: 9919 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
   check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
   lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
   lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
   __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
   fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
   might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
   slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
   slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
   kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020
   btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411
   alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261
   iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline]
   iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228
   btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline]
   btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline]
   btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636
   add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline]
   copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928
   btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592
   log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline]
   btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718
   btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline]
   btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141
   btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
   btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
   vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
   generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
   btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
   do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741
   vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971
   do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
   __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline]
   __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline]
   __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210
   do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
   __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
   do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
   entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
  RIP: 0023:0xf7334579
  Code: b8 01 10 06 03 (...)
  RSP: 002b:00000000f5f265ac EFLAGS: 00000292 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000017b
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00000000200002c0
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000292 R12: 0000000000000000
  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000

Fix this by ensuring we are under a NOFS scope whenever we call
btrfs_iget() during inode logging and log replay.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/
Fixes: 712e36c ("btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL in btrfs_alloc_inode")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Portia Stephens <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
@jankara @smb49
ocfs2: fix DIO failure due to insufficient transaction credits
906a263 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076435

commit be346c1 upstream.

The code in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates number of necessary
transaction credits using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits().  This however does
not take into account that the IO could be arbitrarily large and can
contain arbitrary number of extents.

Extent tree manipulations do often extend the current transaction but not
in all of the cases.  For example if we have only single block extents in
the tree, ocfs2_mark_extent_written() will end up calling
ocfs2_replace_extent_rec() all the time and we will never extend the
current transaction and eventually exhaust all the transaction credits if
the IO contains many single block extents.  Once that happens a
WARN_ON(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) <= 0) is triggered in
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() and subsequently OCFS2 aborts in response to
this error.  This was actually triggered by one of our customers on a
heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystem.

To fix the issue make sure the transaction always has enough credits for
one extent insert before each call of ocfs2_mark_extent_written().

Heming Zhao said:

------
PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device dm-1): panic forced after error"

PID: xxx  TASK: xxxx  CPU: 5  COMMAND: "SubmitThread-CA"
  #0 machine_kexec at ffffffff8c069932
  #1 __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c1338fa
  #2 panic at ffffffff8c1d69b9
  #3 ocfs2_handle_error at ffffffffc0c86c0c [ocfs2]
  #4 __ocfs2_abort at ffffffffc0c88387 [ocfs2]
  #5 ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc0c51e98 [ocfs2]
  #6 ocfs2_split_extent at ffffffffc0c27ea3 [ocfs2]
  #7 ocfs2_change_extent_flag at ffffffffc0c28053 [ocfs2]
  #8 ocfs2_mark_extent_written at ffffffffc0c28347 [ocfs2]
  #9 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write at ffffffffc0c2bef9 [ocfs2]
#10 ocfs2_dio_end_io at ffffffffc0c2c0f5 [ocfs2]
#11 dio_complete at ffffffff8c2b9fa7
#12 do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff8c2bc09f
#13 ocfs2_direct_IO at ffffffffc0c2b653 [ocfs2]
#14 generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff8c1dcf14
#15 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff8c1dd07b
#16 ocfs2_file_write_iter at ffffffffc0c49f1f [ocfs2]
#17 aio_write at ffffffff8c2cc72e
#18 kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8c248dde
#19 do_io_submit at ffffffff8c2ccada
#20 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8c004984
#21 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8c8000ba

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: c15471f ("ocfs2: fix sparse file & data ordering issue in direct io")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]>
Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]>
Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]>
Cc: Gang He <[email protected]>
Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Portia Stephens <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
@eddyz87 @smb49
selftests/bpf: adjust dummy_st_ops_success to detect additional error
9fcf30b 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077600

[ Upstream commit 3b3b84a ]

As reported by Jose E. Marchesi in off-list discussion, GCC and LLVM
generate slightly different code for dummy_st_ops_success/test_1():

  SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
  int BPF_PROG(test_1, struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *state)
  {
  	int ret;

  	if (!state)
  		return 0xf2f3f4f5;

  	ret = state->val;
  	state->val = 0x5a;
  	return ret;
  }

  GCC-generated                  LLVM-generated
  ----------------------------   ---------------------------
  0: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x0)     0: w0 = -0xd0c0b0b
  1: if r1 == 0x0 goto 5f        1: r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 0x0)
  2: r0 = *(s32 *)(r1 + 0x0)     2: if r1 == 0x0 goto 6f
  3: *(u32 *)(r1 + 0x0) = 0x5a   3: r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 0x0)
  4: exit                        4: w2 = 0x5a
  5: r0 = -0xd0c0b0b             5: *(u32 *)(r1 + 0x0) = r2
  6: exit                        6: exit

If the 'state' argument is not marked as nullable in
net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c, the verifier would assume that
'r1 == 0x0' is never true:
- for the GCC version, this means that instructions #5-6 would be
  marked as dead and removed;
- for the LLVM version, all instructions would be marked as live.

The test dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value actually sets the 'state'
parameter to NULL.

Therefore, when the 'state' argument is not marked as nullable,
the GCC-generated version of the code would trigger a NULL pointer
dereference at instruction #3.

This patch updates the test_1() test case to always follow a shape
similar to the GCC-generated version above, in order to verify whether
the 'state' nullability is marked correctly.

Reported-by: Jose E. Marchesi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Portia Stephens <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2025
@smb49
drm/ttm: Always take the bo delayed cleanup path for imported bos
903f6d2 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077600

commit d99fbd9 upstream.

Bos can be put with multiple unrelated dma-resv locks held. But
imported bos attempt to grab the bo dma-resv during dma-buf detach
that typically happens during cleanup. That leads to lockde splats
similar to the below and a potential ABBA deadlock.

Fix this by always taking the delayed workqueue cleanup path for
imported bos.

Requesting stable fixes from when the Xe driver was introduced,
since its usage of drm_exec and wide vm dma_resvs appear to be
the first reliable trigger of this.

[22982.116427] ============================================
[22982.116428] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[22982.116429] 6.10.0-rc2+ #10 Tainted: G     U  W
[22982.116430] --------------------------------------------
[22982.116430] glxgears:sh0/5785 is trying to acquire lock:
[22982.116431] ffff8c2bafa539a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116438]
               but task is already holding lock:
[22982.116438] ffff8c2d9aba6da8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x49/0x2b0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116442]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[22982.116442]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[22982.116443]        CPU0
[22982.116444]        ----
[22982.116444]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[22982.116445]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[22982.116447]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[22982.116447]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

[22982.116448] 5 locks held by glxgears:sh0/5785:
[22982.116449]  #0: ffff8c2d9aba58c8 (&xef->vm.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xe_file_close+0xde/0x1c0 [xe]
[22982.116507]  #1: ffff8c2e28cc8480 (&vm->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: xe_vm_close_and_put+0x161/0x9b0 [xe]
[22982.116578]  #2: ffff8c2e31982970 (&val->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: xe_validation_ctx_init+0x6d/0x70 [xe]
[22982.116647]  #3: ffffacdc469478a8 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: xe_vma_destroy_unlocked+0x7f/0xe0 [xe]
[22982.116716]  #4: ffff8c2d9aba6da8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x49/0x2b0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116719]
               stack backtrace:
[22982.116720] CPU: 8 PID: 5785 Comm: glxgears:sh0 Tainted: G     U  W          6.10.0-rc2+ #10
[22982.116721] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023
[22982.116723] Call Trace:
[22982.116724]  <TASK>
[22982.116725]  dump_stack_lvl+0x77/0xb0
[22982.116727]  __lock_acquire+0x1232/0x2160
[22982.116730]  lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.116732]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116734]  ? __lock_acquire+0x417/0x2160
[22982.116736]  __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xd0/0x13b0
[22982.116738]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116741]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116743]  ? ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90
[22982.116745]  ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90
[22982.116747]  dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116749]  drm_prime_gem_destroy+0x2f/0x40 [drm]
[22982.116775]  xe_ttm_bo_destroy+0x32/0x220 [xe]
[22982.116818]  ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x3a/0x290
[22982.116821]  drm_exec_unlock_all+0xa1/0xd0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116823]  drm_exec_fini+0x12/0xb0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116824]  xe_validation_ctx_fini+0x15/0x40 [xe]
[22982.116892]  xe_vma_destroy_unlocked+0xb1/0xe0 [xe]
[22982.116959]  xe_vm_close_and_put+0x41a/0x9b0 [xe]
[22982.117025]  ? xa_find+0xe3/0x1e0
[22982.117028]  xe_file_close+0x10a/0x1c0 [xe]
[22982.117074]  drm_file_free+0x22a/0x280 [drm]
[22982.117099]  drm_release_noglobal+0x22/0x70 [drm]
[22982.117119]  __fput+0xf1/0x2d0
[22982.117122]  task_work_run+0x59/0x90
[22982.117125]  do_exit+0x330/0xb40
[22982.117127]  do_group_exit+0x36/0xa0
[22982.117129]  get_signal+0xbd2/0xbe0
[22982.117131]  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x3e/0x240
[22982.117134]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1e7/0x290
[22982.117137]  do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x180
[22982.117139]  ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.117140]  ? __set_task_comm+0x28/0x1e0
[22982.117141]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[22982.117144]  ? __set_task_comm+0xe1/0x1e0
[22982.117145]  ? lock_release+0xca/0x290
[22982.117147]  ? __do_sys_prctl+0x245/0xab0
[22982.117149]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xde/0x190
[22982.117150]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xb0/0x290
[22982.117152]  ? do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x180
[22982.117154]  ? __lock_acquire+0x417/0x2160
[22982.117155]  ? reacquire_held_locks+0xd1/0x1f0
[22982.117156]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x30c/0x790
[22982.117158]  ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.117160]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[22982.117162]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x357/0x790
[22982.117163]  ? lock_release+0xca/0x290
[22982.117164]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x361/0x790
[22982.117166]  ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x4b/0xc0
[22982.117168]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117170]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117172]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117174]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[22982.117176] RIP: 0033:0x7f943d267169
[22982.117192] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f943d26713f.
[22982.117193] RSP: 002b:00007f9430bffc80 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
[22982.117195] RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f943d267169
[22982.117196] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000189 RDI: 00005622f89579d0
[22982.117197] RBP: 00007f9430bffcb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff
[22982.117198] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[22982.117199] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00005622f89579d0
[22982.117202]  </TASK>

Fixes: dd08ebf ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Cc: Christian König <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: <[email protected]> # v6.8+
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Portia Stephens <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2025
@mehmetb0
mptcp: prevent MPC handshake on port-based signal endpoints
da6ec34 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2088231

commit 3d041393ea8c815f773020fb4a995331a69c0139 upstream.

Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:

  ============================================
  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
  --------------------------------------------
  syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
  ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
  ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
    lock(k-slock-AF_INET);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
   #0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
   #0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
   #1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
   #1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
   #2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
   #2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
   #2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
   #3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
   #3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
   #3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
   #4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
   #4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
   #5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
   #5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
   #5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
   #6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
   #6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
   check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
   validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
   __lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
   lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
   __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
   _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
   spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
   sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
   mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
   subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
   tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
   tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
   ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
   NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
   NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
   __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
   __netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
   process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
   __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
   napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
   net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
   handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
   do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
   </IRQ>
   <TASK>
   __local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
   local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
   rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
   __dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
   dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
   neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
   neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
   ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
   ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
   __ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
   __tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
   tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
   tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
   tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
   sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
   __release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
   release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
   mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
   mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
   sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
   __sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
   ____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
   ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
   __sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
   __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
   __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
   __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
  RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
  Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
  RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
  RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
  R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
   </TASK>

As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.

Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.

Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.

Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
[ Conflicts in mib.[ch], because commit 6982826fe5e5 ("mptcp: fallback
  to TCP after SYN+MPC drops"), and commit 27069e7cb3d1 ("mptcp: disable
  active MPTCP in case of blackhole") are linked to new features, not
  available in this version. Resolving the conflicts is easy, simply
  adding the new lines declaring the new "endpoint attempt" MIB entry.
  Also a conflict in protocol.h, because commit fce68b0 ("mptcp:
  add scheduled in mptcp_subflow_context") is not in this version, and
  changes the context by introducing 'scheduled' variable just before.
  Also a conflict in pm_netlink.c, because commit 3aa3624 ("mptcp:
  avoid ssock usage in mptcp_pm_nl_create_listen_socket()") is not in
  this version, and refactor the function: that's fine, we can still set
  pm_listener before doing the 'listen()', taking 'ssock->sk' as 'ssk'
  is not defined before this refactoring. There is also a conflict
  because the context has been changed later in commit 69925a346acb
  ("mptcp: ensure listener is unhashed before updating the sk status"). ]
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Portia Stephens <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Roxana Nicolescu <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2025
@smb49
gpio: xilinx: Convert gpio_lock to raw spinlock
f7bf82a 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100328

commit 9860370c2172704b6b4f0075a0c2a29fd84af96a upstream.

irq_chip functions may be called in raw spinlock context. Therefore, we
must also use a raw spinlock for our own internal locking.

This fixes the following lockdep splat:

[    5.349336] =============================
[    5.353349] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[    5.357361] 6.13.0-rc5+ #69 Tainted: G        W
[    5.363031] -----------------------------
[    5.367045] kworker/u17:1/44 is trying to lock:
[    5.371587] ffffff88018b02c0 (&chip->gpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8))
[    5.380079] other info that might help us debug this:
[    5.385138] context-{5:5}
[    5.387762] 5 locks held by kworker/u17:1/44:
[    5.392123] #0: ffffff8800014958 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3204)
[    5.402260] #1: ffffffc082fcbdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3205)
[    5.411528] #2: ffffff880172c900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach (drivers/base/dd.c:1006)
[    5.419929] #3: ffffff88039c8268 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/internals.h:156 kernel/irq/manage.c:1596)
[    5.428331] #4: ffffff88039c80c8 (lock_class#2){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1614)
[    5.436472] stack backtrace:
[    5.439359] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 44 Comm: kworker/u17:1 Tainted: G        W          6.13.0-rc5+ #69
[    5.448690] Tainted: [W]=WARN
[    5.451656] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT)
[    5.455845] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
[    5.461699] Call trace:
[    5.464147] show_stack+0x18/0x24 C
[    5.467821] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
[    5.471501] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130)
[    5.474824] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4828 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176)
[    5.478758] lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5814)
[    5.482429] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162)
[    5.486797] xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8))
[    5.490737] irq_enable (kernel/irq/internals.h:236 kernel/irq/chip.c:170 kernel/irq/chip.c:439 kernel/irq/chip.c:432 kernel/irq/chip.c:345)
[    5.494060] __irq_startup (kernel/irq/internals.h:241 kernel/irq/chip.c:180 kernel/irq/chip.c:250)
[    5.497645] irq_startup (kernel/irq/chip.c:270)
[    5.501143] __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1807)
[    5.504728] request_threaded_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:2208)

Fixes: a32c7ca ("gpio: gpio-xilinx: Add interrupt support")
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Noah Wager <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2025
@smb49
net/mlx5: Fix a lockdep warning as part of the write combining test
24162fc 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100328

[ Upstream commit 1b10a519a45704d4b06ebd9245b272d145752c18 ]

Fix a lockdep warning [1] observed during the write combining test.

The warning indicates a potential nested lock scenario that could lead
to a deadlock.

However, this is a false positive alarm because the SF lock and its
parent lock are distinct ones.

The lockdep confusion arises because the locks belong to the same object
class (i.e., struct mlx5_core_dev).

To resolve this, the code has been refactored to avoid taking both
locks. Instead, only the parent lock is acquired.

[1]
raw_ethernet_bw/2118 is trying to acquire lock:
[  213.619032] ffff88811dd75e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
               mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[  213.620270]
[  213.620270] but task is already holding lock:
[  213.620943] ffff88810b585e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
               mlx5_wc_support_get+0x10c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[  213.622045]
[  213.622045] other info that might help us debug this:
[  213.622778]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  213.622778]
[  213.623465]        CPU0
[  213.623815]        ----
[  213.624148]   lock(&dev->wc_state_lock);
[  213.624615]   lock(&dev->wc_state_lock);
[  213.625071]
[  213.625071]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  213.625071]
[  213.625805]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[  213.625805]
[  213.626522] 4 locks held by raw_ethernet_bw/2118:
[  213.627019]  #0: ffff88813f80d578 (&uverbs_dev->disassociate_srcu){.+.+}-{0:0},
                at: ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[  213.628088]  #1: ffff88810fb23930 (&file->hw_destroy_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3},
                at: ib_init_ucontext+0x2d/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[  213.629094]  #2: ffff88810fb23878 (&file->ucontext_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
                at: ib_init_ucontext+0x49/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[  213.630106]  #3: ffff88810b585e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
                at: mlx5_wc_support_get+0x10c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[  213.631185]
[  213.631185] stack backtrace:
[  213.631718] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2118 Comm: raw_ethernet_bw Not tainted
               6.12.0-rc7_internal_net_next_mlx5_89a0ad0 #1
[  213.632722] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
               rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[  213.633785] Call Trace:
[  213.634099]
[  213.634393]  dump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0
[  213.634806]  print_deadlock_bug+0x278/0x3c0
[  213.635265]  __lock_acquire+0x15f4/0x2c40
[  213.635712]  lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2d0
[  213.636120]  ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[  213.636722]  ? mlx5_ib_enable_lb+0x24/0xa0 [mlx5_ib]
[  213.637277]  __mutex_lock+0x81/0xda0
[  213.637697]  ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[  213.638305]  ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[  213.638902]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
[  213.639400]  ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[  213.640016]  mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[  213.640615]  set_ucontext_resp+0x68/0x2b0 [mlx5_ib]
[  213.641144]  ? debug_mutex_init+0x33/0x40
[  213.641586]  mlx5_ib_alloc_ucontext+0x18e/0x7b0 [mlx5_ib]
[  213.642145]  ib_init_ucontext+0xa0/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[  213.642679]  ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_GET_CONTEXT+0x95/0xc0
                [ib_uverbs]
[  213.643426]  ? _copy_from_user+0x46/0x80
[  213.643878]  ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0xa6b/0xc80 [ib_uverbs]
[  213.644426]  ? ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0x130/0x130
               [ib_uverbs]
[  213.645213]  ? __lock_acquire+0xa99/0x2c40
[  213.645675]  ? lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2d0
[  213.646101]  ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[  213.646625]  ? reacquire_held_locks+0xcf/0x1f0
[  213.647102]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x45d/0x770
[  213.647586]  ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xe0/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[  213.648102]  ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[  213.648632]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4d3/0xaa0
[  213.649060]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x4a8/0x770
[  213.649528]  do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
[  213.649947]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
[  213.650478] RIP: 0033:0x7fa179b0737b
[  213.650893] Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c
               89 e0 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8
               10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d
               7d 2a 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  213.652619] RSP: 002b:00007ffd2e6d46e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
               0000000000000010
[  213.653390] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd2e6d47f8 RCX:
               00007fa179b0737b
[  213.654084] RDX: 00007ffd2e6d47e0 RSI: 00000000c0181b01 RDI:
               0000000000000003
[  213.654767] RBP: 00007ffd2e6d47c0 R08: 00007fa1799be010 R09:
               0000000000000002
[  213.655453] R10: 00007ffd2e6d4960 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
               00007ffd2e6d487c
[  213.656170] R13: 0000000000000027 R14: 0000000000000001 R15:
               00007ffd2e6d4f70

Fixes: d98995b ("net/mlx5: Reimplement write combining test")
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michael Guralnik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Larysa Zaremba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Noah Wager <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
@mehmetb0
xfrm: delete intermediate secpath entry in packet offload mode
589399d 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103829

[ Upstream commit 600258d555f0710b9c47fb78d2d80a4aecd608cc ]

Packets handled by hardware have added secpath as a way to inform XFRM
core code that this path was already handled. That secpath is not needed
at all after policy is checked and it is removed later in the stack.

However, in the case of IP forwarding is enabled (/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward),
that secpath is not removed and packets which already were handled are reentered
to the driver TX path with xfrm_offload set.

The following kernel panic is observed in mlx5 in such case:

 mlx5_core 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0f0np0: Link up
 mlx5_core 0000:04:00.1 enp4s0f1np1: Link up
 Initializing XFRM netlink socket
 IPsec XFRM device driver
 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
 #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
 #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page
 PGD 0 P4D 0
 Oops: Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-alex #3
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
 RIP: 0010:0x0
 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6.
 RSP: 0018:ffffb87380003800 EFLAGS: 00010206
 RAX: ffff8df004e02600 RBX: ffffb873800038d8 RCX: 00000000ffff98cf
 RDX: ffff8df00733e108 RSI: ffff8df00521fb80 RDI: ffff8df001661f00
 RBP: ffffb87380003850 R08: ffff8df013980000 R09: 0000000000000010
 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff8df001661f00
 R13: ffff8df00521fb80 R14: ffff8df00733e108 R15: ffff8df011faf04e
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8df46b800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 0000000106384000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  ? show_regs+0x63/0x70
  ? __die_body+0x20/0x60
  ? __die+0x2b/0x40
  ? page_fault_oops+0x15c/0x550
  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3ed/0x870
  ? exc_page_fault+0x7f/0x190
  ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
  mlx5e_ipsec_handle_tx_skb+0xe7/0x2f0 [mlx5_core]
  mlx5e_xmit+0x58e/0x1980 [mlx5_core]
  ? __fib_lookup+0x6a/0xb0
  dev_hard_start_xmit+0x82/0x1d0
  sch_direct_xmit+0xfe/0x390
  __dev_queue_xmit+0x6d8/0xee0
  ? __fib_lookup+0x6a/0xb0
  ? internal_add_timer+0x48/0x70
  ? mod_timer+0xe2/0x2b0
  neigh_resolve_output+0x115/0x1b0
  __neigh_update+0x26a/0xc50
  neigh_update+0x14/0x20
  arp_process+0x2cb/0x8e0
  ? __napi_build_skb+0x5e/0x70
  arp_rcv+0x11e/0x1c0
  ? dev_gro_receive+0x574/0x820
  __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x1cf/0x1f0
  netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x183/0x2a0
  napi_complete_done+0x76/0x1c0
  mlx5e_napi_poll+0x234/0x7a0 [mlx5_core]
  __napi_poll+0x2d/0x1f0
  net_rx_action+0x1a6/0x370
  ? atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x3b/0x50
  ? irq_int_handler+0x15/0x20 [mlx5_core]
  handle_softirqs+0xb9/0x2f0
  ? handle_irq_event+0x44/0x60
  irq_exit_rcu+0xdb/0x100
  common_interrupt+0x98/0xc0
  </IRQ>
  <TASK>
  asm_common_interrupt+0x27/0x40
 RIP: 0010:pv_native_safe_halt+0xb/0x10
 Code: 09 c3 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 0f 22
 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 eb 07 0f 00 2d 7f e9 36 00 fb
40 00 83 ff 07 77 21 89 ff ff 24 fd 88 3d a1 bd 0f 21 f8
 RSP: 0018:ffffffffbe603de8 EFLAGS: 00000202
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000f92f46680
 RDX: 0000000000000037 RSI: 00000000ffffffff RDI: 00000000000518d4
 RBP: ffffffffbe603df0 R08: 000000cd42e4dffb R09: ffffffffbe603d70
 R10: 0000004d80d62680 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffbe60bf40
 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffffbe60aff8
  ? default_idle+0x9/0x20
  arch_cpu_idle+0x9/0x10
  default_idle_call+0x29/0xf0
  do_idle+0x1f2/0x240
  cpu_startup_entry+0x2c/0x30
  rest_init+0xe7/0x100
  start_kernel+0x76b/0xb90
  x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30
  x86_64_start_kernel+0xc0/0x110
  ? setup_ghcb+0xe/0x130
  common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141
  </TASK>
 Modules linked in: esp4_offload esp4 xfrm_interface
xfrm6_tunnel tunnel4 tunnel6 xfrm_user xfrm_algo binfmt_misc
intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common kvm_amd ccp kvm input_leds serio_raw
qemu_fw_cfg sch_fq_codel dm_multipath scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc
scsi_dh_alua efi_pstore ip_tables x_tables autofs4 raid10 raid456
async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq raid6_pq async_xor xor async_tx
libcrc32c raid1 raid0 mlx5_core crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul
polyval_clmulni polyval_generic ghash_clmulni_intel sha256_ssse3
sha1_ssse3 ahci mlxfw i2c_i801 libahci i2c_mux i2c_smbus psample
virtio_rng pci_hyperv_intf aesni_intel crypto_simd cryptd
 CR2: 0000000000000000
 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
 RIP: 0010:0x0
 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6.
 RSP: 0018:ffffb87380003800 EFLAGS: 00010206
 RAX: ffff8df004e02600 RBX: ffffb873800038d8 RCX: 00000000ffff98cf
 RDX: ffff8df00733e108 RSI: ffff8df00521fb80 RDI: ffff8df001661f00
 RBP: ffffb87380003850 R08: ffff8df013980000 R09: 0000000000000010
 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff8df001661f00
 R13: ffff8df00521fb80 R14: ffff8df00733e108 R15: ffff8df011faf04e
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8df46b800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 0000000106384000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
 Kernel Offset: 0x3b800000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
 ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt ]---

Fixes: 5958372 ("xfrm: add RX datapath protection for IPsec packet offload mode")
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Cassen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Noah Wager <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mehmet Basaran <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
@Sberm @mehmetb0
perf trace: Fix runtime error of index out of bounds
6566047 
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103829

[ Upstream commit c7b87ce0dd10b64b68a0b22cb83bbd556e28fe81 ]

libtraceevent parses and returns an array of argument fields, sometimes
larger than RAW_SYSCALL_ARGS_NUM (6) because it includes "__syscall_nr",
idx will traverse to index 6 (7th element) whereas sc->fmt->arg holds 6
elements max, creating an out-of-bounds access. This runtime error is
found by UBsan. The error message:

  $ sudo UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1 ./perf trace -a --max-events=1
  builtin-trace.c:1966:35: runtime error: index 6 out of bounds for type 'syscall_arg_fmt [6]'
    #0 0x5c04956be5fe in syscall__alloc_arg_fmts /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:1966
    #1 0x5c04956c0510 in trace__read_syscall_info /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:2110
    #2 0x5c04956c372b in trace__syscall_info /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:2436
    #3 0x5c04956d2f39 in trace__init_syscalls_bpf_prog_array_maps /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:3897
    #4 0x5c04956d6d25 in trace__run /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:4335
    #5 0x5c04956e112e in cmd_trace /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:5502
    #6 0x5c04956eda7d in run_builtin /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:351
    #7 0x5c04956ee0a8 in handle_internal_command /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:404
    #8 0x5c04956ee37f in run_argv /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:448
    #9 0x5c04956ee8e9 in main /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:556
    #10 0x79eb3622a3b7 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
    #11 0x79eb3622a47a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360
    #12 0x5c04955422d4 in _start (/home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf+0x4e02d4) (BuildId: 5b6cab2d59e96a4341741765ad6914a4d784dbc6)

     0.000 ( 0.014 ms): Chrome_ChildIO/117244 write(fd: 238, buf: !, count: 1)                                      = 1

Fixes: 5e58fcf ("perf trace: Allow allocating sc->arg_fmt even without the syscall tracepoint")
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Noah Wager <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mehmet Basaran <[email protected]>
delphix-devops-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
@chleroy @mehmetb0
powerpc/code-patching: Disable KASAN report during patching via tempo…
233628c 
…rary mm

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106494

[ Upstream commit dc9c5166c3cb044f8a001e397195242fd6796eee ]

Erhard reports the following KASAN hit on Talos II (power9) with kernel 6.13:

[   12.028126] ==================================================================
[   12.028198] BUG: KASAN: user-memory-access in copy_to_kernel_nofault+0x8c/0x1a0
[   12.028260] Write of size 8 at addr 0000187e458f2000 by task systemd/1

[   12.028346] CPU: 87 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Tainted: G                T  6.13.0-P9-dirty #3
[   12.028408] Tainted: [T]=RANDSTRUCT
[   12.028446] Hardware name: T2P9D01 REV 1.01 POWER9 0x4e1202 opal:skiboot-bc106a0 PowerNV
[   12.028500] Call Trace:
[   12.028536] [c000000008dbf3b0] [c000000001656a48] dump_stack_lvl+0xbc/0x110 (unreliable)
[   12.028609] [c000000008dbf3f0] [c0000000006e2fc8] print_report+0x6b0/0x708
[   12.028666] [c000000008dbf4e0] [c0000000006e2454] kasan_report+0x164/0x300
[   12.028725] [c000000008dbf600] [c0000000006e54d4] kasan_check_range+0x314/0x370
[   12.028784] [c000000008dbf640] [c0000000006e6310] __kasan_check_write+0x20/0x40
[   12.028842] [c000000008dbf660] [c000000000578e8c] copy_to_kernel_nofault+0x8c/0x1a0
[   12.028902] [c000000008dbf6a0] [c0000000000acfe4] __patch_instructions+0x194/0x210
[   12.028965] [c000000008dbf6e0] [c0000000000ade80] patch_instructions+0x150/0x590
[   12.029026] [c000000008dbf7c0] [c0000000001159bc] bpf_arch_text_copy+0x6c/0xe0
[   12.029085] [c000000008dbf800] [c000000000424250] bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize+0x40/0xc0
[   12.029147] [c000000008dbf830] [c000000000115dec] bpf_int_jit_compile+0x3bc/0x930
[   12.029206] [c000000008dbf990] [c000000000423720] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x1f0/0x280
[   12.029266] [c000000008dbfa00] [c000000000434b18] bpf_prog_load+0xbb8/0x1370
[   12.029324] [c000000008dbfb70] [c000000000436ebc] __sys_bpf+0x5ac/0x2e00
[   12.029379] [c000000008dbfd00] [c00000000043a228] sys_bpf+0x28/0x40
[   12.029435] [c000000008dbfd20] [c000000000038eb4] system_call_exception+0x334/0x610
[   12.029497] [c000000008dbfe50] [c00000000000c270] system_call_vectored_common+0xf0/0x280
[   12.029561] --- interrupt: 3000 at 0x3fff82f5cfa8
[   12.029608] NIP:  00003fff82f5cfa8 LR: 00003fff82f5cfa8 CTR: 0000000000000000
[   12.029660] REGS: c000000008dbfe80 TRAP: 3000   Tainted: G                T   (6.13.0-P9-dirty)
[   12.029735] MSR:  900000000280f032 <SF,HV,VEC,VSX,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI>  CR: 42004848  XER: 00000000
[   12.029855] IRQMASK: 0
               GPR00: 0000000000000169 00003fffdcf789a0 00003fff83067100 0000000000000005
               GPR04: 00003fffdcf78a98 0000000000000090 0000000000000000 0000000000000008
               GPR08: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
               GPR12: 0000000000000000 00003fff836ff7e0 c000000000010678 0000000000000000
               GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00003fffdcf78f28 00003fffdcf78f90
               GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00003fffdcf78f80
               GPR24: 00003fffdcf78f70 00003fffdcf78d10 00003fff835c7239 00003fffdcf78bd8
               GPR28: 00003fffdcf78a98 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000011f547580
[   12.030316] NIP [00003fff82f5cfa8] 0x3fff82f5cfa8
[   12.030361] LR [00003fff82f5cfa8] 0x3fff82f5cfa8
[   12.030405] --- interrupt: 3000
[   12.030444] ==================================================================

Commit c28c15b ("powerpc/code-patching: Use temporary mm for
Radix MMU") is inspired from x86 but unlike x86 is doesn't disable
KASAN reports during patching. This wasn't a problem at the begining
because __patch_mem() is not instrumented.

Commit 465cabc ("powerpc/code-patching: introduce
patch_instructions()") use copy_to_kernel_nofault() to copy several
instructions at once. But when using temporary mm the destination is
not regular kernel memory but a kind of kernel-like memory located
in user address space. Because it is not in kernel address space it is
not covered by KASAN shadow memory. Since commit e4137f08816b ("mm,
kasan, kmsan: instrument copy_from/to_kernel_nofault") KASAN reports
bad accesses from copy_to_kernel_nofault(). Here a bad access to user
memory is reported because KASAN detects the lack of shadow memory and
the address is below TASK_SIZE.

Do like x86 in commit b3fd8e8 ("x86/alternatives: Use temporary
mm for text poking") and disable KASAN reports during patching when
using temporary mm.

Reported-by: Erhard Furtner <[email protected]>
Close: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250201151435.48400261@yea/
Fixes: 465cabc ("powerpc/code-patching: introduce patch_instructions()")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1c05b2a1b02ad75b981cfc45927e0b4a90441046.1738577687.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Noah Wager <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mehmet Basaran <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pzakha pzakha pzakha approved these changes

@brad-lewis brad-lewis brad-lewis approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@don-brady @pzakha @brad-lewis