Update README.md

[bamurtaugh]

Updating based on feedback.

cc @joshspicer @edgonmsft @sinedied

[Chuxel]

A few thoughts on second read.

[Chuxel]

Perhaps we should get more specific and say this is specifically for the dev container spec.

We've talked about the CLI potentially being in a different repo. @charmarti - Assuming that's the way it goes, would we keep issues specific to the CLI implementation there? (I assume so).

[bamurtaugh]

Updated to This repository is for the Development Container Specification. - does that read better?

We've talked about the CLI potentially being in a different repo. @charmarti - Assuming that's the way it goes, would we keep issues specific to the CLI implementation there?

Do we think seeking issues in another location could be confusing? As this open spec concept will be new to folks, wondering if there's anything we should consider, i.e. a list of which repos users should file issues in for what?

cc @chrmarti

[bamurtaugh]

@Chuxel @chrmarti Does the current state of this PR look good to merge?

[Chuxel]

Generally LGTM! On question I have is whether we want to reference the CLI as "coming soon" given its not available yet. The alternative would be to not mention it right now.

[bamurtaugh]

Good call out @Chuxel! Updated to:

You will be able to use the upcoming open-source CLI reference implementation either directly...

Does that sound reasonable?

[Chuxel]

Yep!

[bamurtaugh]

Thanks for the reviews! Merging now.