Skip to content

Turn string constraints into a struct #1784

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

romainbrenguier
Copy link
Contributor

This used to be a class. But we can have it a a simple struct instead, and the code looks simpler.

Copy link
Contributor

@LAJW LAJW left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, please, as long as it compiles.

@romainbrenguier romainbrenguier force-pushed the refactor/turn-constraint-into-struct branch 2 times, most recently from 7af265f to 453845a Compare February 8, 2018 12:14
@romainbrenguier romainbrenguier force-pushed the refactor/turn-constraint-into-struct branch 5 times, most recently from 9562529 to d4dee60 Compare February 21, 2018 07:25
@romainbrenguier romainbrenguier force-pushed the refactor/turn-constraint-into-struct branch 2 times, most recently from 50a8064 to 03693d6 Compare February 26, 2018 14:20
@romainbrenguier romainbrenguier force-pushed the refactor/turn-constraint-into-struct branch 4 times, most recently from 797a71d to 2063358 Compare March 21, 2018 11:48
romainbrenguier and others added 6 commits March 21, 2018 15:16
Use standard algorithm instead of defining a visitor class
Doxygen gives warning on this link command, because it is not able to
resolve it.
Make doxygen stop complaining about missing fields.
Lower bound should not use java_type
@romainbrenguier
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is now outdated and similar changes were made in another PR which is now merged.

@romainbrenguier romainbrenguier deleted the refactor/turn-constraint-into-struct branch June 4, 2018 11:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants