Skip to content

Sharing map sharing statistics #2509

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 31, 2018

Conversation

danpoe
Copy link
Contributor

@danpoe danpoe commented Jul 2, 2018

This adds functionality to compute how many nodes are shared between a set of sharing maps.

Copy link
Collaborator

@tautschnig tautschnig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's probably very good work, but greater clarity would be appreciated. See details, below.


#include <climits>
#include <random>
#include <set>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems unrelated to the topic of the PR?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@danpoe danpoe Jul 23, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The newly introduced functions count_unmarked_nodes() and get_sharing_stats() use std::set which was not used before in the sharing map.

Ah, the comment might refer to the two changed defines. Yes, that's a fix that activates the internal assertions in the unit tests and is technically unrelated to the topic of this PR. Should I make a separate PR for this?

@@ -151,8 +153,6 @@ SN_TYPE_PAR_DEF class sharing_node_innert : public sharing_node_baset

d_it &write_internal()
{
SN_ASSERT(data.use_count() > 0);

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any test that shows that this is wrong (and is now correct)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@danpoe danpoe Jul 23, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code was already exercised by several tests, but I used the wrong macro names to activate the sharing map/node internal assertions in the unit tests. Thus, none of the internal assertions were enabled and we didn't see the assertion failures. This is corrected by the first commit in this PR.

SN_ASSERT(as_const(this)->find_leaf(k) == nullptr);
// we need to check empty() first as the const version of find_leaf() must
// not be called on an empty node
SN_ASSERT(empty() || as_const(this)->find_leaf(k) == nullptr);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again, is there a test?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(see comment above)

@@ -128,6 +134,7 @@ class sharing_mapt
friend void sharing_map_copy_test();
friend void sharing_map_collision_test();
friend void sharing_map_view_test();
friend void sharing_map_sharing_stats_test();
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At the risk of getting side-tracked: couldn't those tests be implemented by deriving a new child that provides more access? Those far-away friends are a bit of a pain point...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean deriving a new class from sharing_mapt in the unit tests which has public methods that wrap the protected members that we want to test? Alternatively, we could also derive a new class from sharing_mapt in the unit tests which then includes those friend declarations above.

What is the issue with the current approach though? Since the friends declared above are only from the unit tests it seems relatively safe.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Far-away friends are easy to lose touch with. In code terms, I effectively need to git grep to figure out who you are trying to be friends with. Maybe the solution is just adding a comment :-) In practice, adding a new test currently requires touching this code, which really shouldn't be necessary. Hence my preference for deriving a new class from sharing_mapt in the unit tests, which would restrict any changes in unit tests to the unit test code.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I see. Yeah, I'll derive from sharing_mapt in the unit tests.

@@ -317,6 +354,11 @@ class sharing_mapt
void gather_all(const baset &n, const unsigned depth, delta_viewt &delta_view)
const;

unsigned count_unmarked_nodes(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should almost certainly be std::size_t

@@ -317,6 +354,11 @@ class sharing_mapt
void gather_all(const baset &n, const unsigned depth, delta_viewt &delta_view)
const;

unsigned count_unmarked_nodes(
bool leafs_only,
std::set<void *> &marked,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Phew, what is this meant to be? What can be done using a set of void pointers?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The set marked contains pointers to the nodes with use_count >= 2 that have been visited already during the traversal. It's used to avoid exploring shared subtrees more than once.

The sharing map has two different types of nodes that don't have a common base class, so I used void pointers here to avoid having to keep two separate sets marked for both node types.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 7577e52).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/77894414

@danpoe danpoe force-pushed the feature/sharing-map-stats branch from 7577e52 to ab4f984 Compare July 23, 2018 12:56
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: ab4f984).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/79729117

/// only leafs are counted.
class sharing_map_statst
{
public:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd just use a struct here as all members are public.

@danpoe danpoe force-pushed the feature/sharing-map-stats branch from ab4f984 to 4ae8eb6 Compare July 31, 2018 13:59
@danpoe danpoe requested a review from pkesseli as a code owner July 31, 2018 13:59
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: 4ae8eb6).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/80509299

@danpoe danpoe merged commit b6258db into diffblue:develop Jul 31, 2018
NathanJPhillips added a commit to NathanJPhillips/cbmc that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2018
6a10f1a Merge pull request diffblue#2462 from tautschnig/vs-goto-inline
96fc7b1 Merge pull request diffblue#2654 from peterschrammel/update-jml8
1847066 Update jbmc/lib/java-models-library to java-models-library#8 (remove sun.* imports)
c157ba7 Revert "CMake version.cpp: switch back to add_custom_target"
7a009d6 Merge pull request diffblue#2650 from diffblue/aws-codebuild-clcache
63652fc add clcache to Windows build
6f72b3b Merge pull request diffblue#2657 from smowton/smowton/fix/cmake-version-cpp
35d09d5 CMake version.cpp: switch back to add_custom_target
80331d8 Merge pull request diffblue#2638 from diffblue/CBMC_VERSION_string
7c066f9 Merge pull request diffblue#2618 from owen-jones-diffblue/doc/move-irep-docs-from-util-to-irep
ad5c375 use a string instead of macro for version number
b6258db Merge pull request diffblue#2509 from danpoe/feature/sharing-map-stats
eb71a01 Merge pull request diffblue#2639 from thk123/array-element-type
c5519ec Merge pull request diffblue#2640 from allredj/support-for-load-containing-class-only
0855872 Address review comments diffblue#2
eaa7664 Wrap lines properly
e682eb9 Add \ref in lots of places
3023cca Address review comments
758f069 Move dstringt documentation to above dstringt
a54c82d Move documentation of irept to be above irept
b827ea4 Use type equality check in unit tests
77185fd Merge pull request diffblue#2607 from jeannielynnmoulton/jeannie/ParseThrownExceptions2
1f4ef40 Add class loader debug output
4ae8eb6 Move sharing map friends declarations to unit tests
186897c Sharing stats for the sharing map
4438b43 Fix sharing map internal assertion
332febe Remove wrong sharing map internal assertions
be7e140 Activate internal checks for the sharing map unit tests
713d3fe Merge pull request diffblue#2636 from polgreen/fix_function_map
87f90ee Add replace_all string utility
ea2d393 Make test work on windows
4fa9943 Make array element type be not a comment
655248a Add unit test for when there are no exceptions.
a6e7c4b Refactors interface for exceptions to not use irepts.
1134bba Creates java_method_typet which extends code_typet
aa83622 Unit tests method get_super_class
565c999 Unit tests throws exceptions parsing.
eb88509 Use parsed information for thrown exceptions.
5c7dcac Parses the exception attribute
7fcc42d Adds const to get/set_outer_class
5994dd8 Add method to get super class from java class type.
fbad2d9 Rename variable extends to super_class
6d0776f if function is not in the function map, treat as if it has no body
da86bdb Merge pull request diffblue#2602 from diffblue/__CPROVER_r/w_ok
0202f34 refactor pointer_validity_check using address_check
4a24ad4 use __CPROVER_r/w_ok in string.c library
732ce2a expand __CPROVER_r/w_ok in goto_check
acfea65 __CPROVER_r_ok and __CPROVER_w_ok added to ANSI-C front-end
0618f7d Merge pull request diffblue#2628 from diffblue/clang-extensions
5e43131 Merge pull request diffblue#2608 from diffblue/ms_cl_int64
7c56091 Merge pull request diffblue#2634 from qaphla/local_bitvector_analysis_regression
44ef8d5 Merge pull request diffblue#2630 from diffblue/invalid-pointer-flattening
f74c161 test for __float80 and __float128
8288a72 __float80 is a typedef, not a keyword
5495625 FreeBSD: default flavor is now CLANG
e63402e added _Null_unspecified clang extension
16a49a7 bugfix: __float128
3849bb0 rename APPLE flavor to CLANG
060b59c separate pointer check for integer addresses
9b5847e fix flattening of ID_invalid_pointer
432dcf1 Added a regression test checking that --pointer-check does not generate excess checks if local_bitvector_analysis can gather information on the pointer being checked.
cbfcc5c added support for _int64 keyword
0148347 Avoid signed/unsigned casts and conversion in goto_inline

git-subtree-dir: cbmc
git-subtree-split: 6a10f1a
@danpoe danpoe deleted the feature/sharing-map-stats branch June 2, 2020 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants