Skip to content

Program dependence graph: track SET_RETURN_VALUE instruction #6711

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

We did track a dependency from END_FUNCTION towards the call site when a
return value was being assigned, but failed to keep track of the data
dependency between SET_RETURN_VALUE and END_FUNCTION.

Also clean up commented-out code that used to handle return values, but
has since been superseded.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

We did track a dependency from END_FUNCTION towards the call site when a
return value was being assigned, but failed to keep track of the data
dependency between SET_RETURN_VALUE and END_FUNCTION.

Also clean up commented-out code that used to handle return values, but
has since been superseded.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 8, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #6711 (8305936) into develop (6594cbb) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #6711   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    77.15%   77.15%           
========================================
  Files         1582     1582           
  Lines       182628   182647   +19     
========================================
+ Hits        140900   140920   +20     
+ Misses       41728    41727    -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/analyses/reaching_definitions.cpp 77.51% <ø> (ø)
src/analyses/dependence_graph.cpp 90.36% <100.00%> (+0.68%) ⬆️
src/analyses/dependence_graph.h 85.13% <100.00%> (+1.31%) ⬆️
src/goto-checker/properties.cpp 80.53% <100.00%> (+0.35%) ⬆️
src/util/xml_irep.cpp 25.92% <0.00%> (+1.85%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update de9fa65...8305936. Read the comment docs.

@kroening kroening merged commit c61ee27 into diffblue:develop Mar 9, 2022
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the bugfixes/dependence-graph-return-values branch March 9, 2022 15:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants