fix: prettier #298
fix: prettier #298
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve renaming the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/sdk/readme.md (1)
Line range hint
1-424: Suggestions for README improvementsThe README is well-structured and informative. Consider the following minor improvements:
- Add a brief introduction to Dojo at the beginning of the document to provide context for new users.
- Include a section on compatibility and version requirements.
- Add more examples of complex queries in the Advanced Usage section.
- Expand the Troubleshooting section with common issues and their solutions.
- Consider adding a Changelog section to track major updates to the SDK.
These additions would make the documentation more comprehensive and user-friendly.
examples/example-vite-react-sdk/src/App.tsx (2)
13-13: LGTM! Consider updating the import statement for consistency.The change from
dbtosdkin the function signature is appropriate and aligns with the new naming convention. This improves clarity and consistency in the codebase.For complete consistency, consider updating the import statement at the top of the file:
- import { SDK, createDojoStore } from "@dojoengine/sdk"; + import { SDK as DojoSDK, createDojoStore } from "@dojoengine/sdk";Then update the type annotation:
- function App({ sdk }: { sdk: SDK<Schema> }) { + function App({ sdk }: { sdk: DojoSDK<Schema> }) {This change would make it clear that we're using the Dojo-specific SDK implementation.
Line range hint
79-114: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling.The changes in this
useEffecthook are consistent with the renaming ofdbtosdk. All references have been updated correctly, and the dependency array has been properly adjusted to includesdk.Consider enhancing the error handling in the
fetchEntitiesfunction. Currently, errors are only logged to the console. It might be beneficial to update the component's state to reflect the error condition, allowing you to display an error message to the user if the entity fetch fails. For example:const [fetchError, setFetchError] = useState<string | null>(null); // In the fetchEntities function: try { // ... existing code ... } catch (error) { console.error("Error querying entities:", error); setFetchError("Failed to fetch entities. Please try again later."); } // In the component's JSX: {fetchError && <div className="text-red-500">{fetchError}</div>}This would provide a better user experience by making errors visible in the UI.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- examples/example-vite-react-sdk/src/App.tsx (4 hunks)
- examples/example-vite-react-sdk/src/main.tsx (2 hunks)
- packages/create-dojo/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/create-dojo/src/commands/start.ts (0 hunks)
- packages/sdk/readme.md (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/create-dojo/src/commands/start.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
examples/example-vite-react-sdk/src/main.tsx (3)
14-14: Approve renaming 'db' to 'sdk'The change from
dbtosdkis a good improvement. It more accurately describes the initialized object, which is the Software Development Kit (SDK) for Dojo. This naming convention enhances code readability and maintainability.
Line range hint
14-37: Summary of changes: Improved naming conventionThe changes in this file consistently rename the
dbvariable and prop tosdk. This update:
- Improves code readability by using a more accurate term (SDK instead of DB).
- Maintains consistency throughout the file.
- Does not introduce any functional changes.
These modifications align well with the PR objectives and contribute to better code maintainability.
37-37: Approve updating App component propThe change from
<App db={db} />to<App sdk={sdk} />is correct and consistent with the earlier variable renaming. This ensures that the newly namedsdkobject is properly passed to the App component.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify that all occurrences of the 'db' prop have been updated:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
All instances of the 'db' prop have been successfully renamed to 'sdk' across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining 'db' props in React components # Test: Search for 'db' props in .tsx files. Expect: No results for '<App db=' or similar patterns. rg --type tsx 'db=\{' ./srcLength of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining 'db' props in React components within .tsx files # Test: Search for 'db=' props in .tsx files. Expect: No results for '<App db=' or similar patterns. rg 'db=' --glob '*.tsx' ./srcLength of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining 'db' props in React components within .tsx files # Test: Search for 'db=' props in all .tsx files recursively from the repository root. rg 'db=' --glob '*.tsx' .Length of output: 25
packages/sdk/readme.md (1)
271-271: LGTM: API refactoring fromdbtosdkThe change from
db.generateTypedDatatosdk.generateTypedDatais correct and consistent with the API refactoring mentioned in the summary.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for any remaining instances of
db.generateTypedDatain the documentation:If any instances are found, they should be updated to use
sdk.generateTypedData.examples/example-vite-react-sdk/src/App.tsx (2)
Line range hint
32-74: LGTM! Consistent update of SDK reference.The changes in this
useEffecthook are consistent with the renaming ofdbtosdk. All references have been updated correctly, and the dependency array has been properly adjusted to includesdk.
Line range hint
1-314: Overall, the changes look good and improve code consistency.The renaming of
dbtosdkhas been implemented consistently throughout the file. This change enhances the clarity of the code and aligns with the PR objectives. The functionality of the component remains intact, and the updates to theuseEffecthooks and their dependency arrays are correct.A few minor suggestions have been made to further improve the code:
- Updating the import statement for complete consistency.
- Enhancing error handling in the entity fetching logic.
These suggestions are optional and do not affect the overall correctness of the changes.
| "files": [ | ||
| "dist" | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Dist directory is missing in the package.
The dist directory specified in the files field does not exist, which means the package may not include the necessary compiled files.
- Ensure that the build process generates the
distdirectory before publishing.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consider verifying package contents.
The addition of the files field to explicitly include the dist directory is a good practice. It ensures that the compiled code is included in the published package and provides better control over the package contents.
To ensure that all necessary files are included in the package, consider running a dry-run publish and verifying the contents:
This will help confirm that no essential files are accidentally excluded due to the new files field.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the contents of the package to be published
# Navigate to the package directory
cd packages/create-dojo
# Perform a dry-run publish and list the files that would be included
npm publish --dry-run
# Output the result
echo "Please review the list of files above to ensure all necessary files are included."
Length of output: 293
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all files in the dist directory to verify package contents
# Navigate to the package directory
cd packages/create-dojo
# Check if the dist directory exists
if [ -d "dist" ]; then
echo "Listing contents of the dist directory:"
ls -R dist
else
echo "Error: dist directory does not exist."
fi
Length of output: 128
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Chores
distdirectory in the published package.