Skip to content

Update yarn.lock files #32654

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
1 commit merged into from
May 14, 2021
Merged

Update yarn.lock files #32654

1 commit merged into from
May 14, 2021

Conversation

halter73
Copy link
Member

After #32577, I see these changes when I build.

@halter73 halter73 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 13, 2021 20:19
Copy link
Member

@captainsafia captainsafia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

After I updated ws in the common project, I didn't go through and run a build on the repo to propogate the change to its consumers.

Thanks for addressing that.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 13, 2021

Hello @halter73!

Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.

Do note that I've been instructed to only help merge pull requests of this repository that have been opened for at least 60 minutes, a condition that will be fulfilled in about 52 minutes. No worries though, I will be back when the time is right! 😉

p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.

@ghost ghost merged commit 29e3752 into main May 14, 2021
@ghost ghost deleted the halter73/yarn-lock branch May 14, 2021 04:43
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants