§15.10.1 Add note for purpose of in parameters in operators #845
Labels
type: clarity
While not technically incorrect, the Standard is potentially confusing
Milestone
#842 adds a fix so that operators can have
in
parameters. We might want to add a note to explain the purpose of this (to avoid copying large values) - but exactly where that should go (operators, orin
parameters in general?) could take some discussion, so this is going to be post-v7.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: