Grammar validation #311
Merged
Grammar validation #311
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Add lexer rules to grammar validation Include the stub definitions for lexer members into the grammar file. * Fix a script error. > vs. >>
After these changes, the only concerns are the mutual left recursion rules.
RexJaeschke
approved these changes
May 4, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@RexJaeschke
I found the remaining syntax issues while reviewing #261
Since most of these weren't in placed you'd changed, I made a fresh PR to address those.
Once you accept these, the only remaining validation issue is the mutual left recursion issue.