Skip to content

Microsoft.ML.InternalCodeAnalyzer should use Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Testing for harness setup #2480

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
mareklinka opened this issue Feb 8, 2019 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@mareklinka
Copy link
Contributor

As discussed in in this PR, the tests for the internal code analyzer should make use of the facilities provided in Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Testing.

That would make the test project more best-practice compliant and easier to maintain.

@sharwell
Copy link
Contributor

@shauheen This says assigned but I'm not sure who it's assigned to. I'm happy to work with the assignee to set up the tests and understand why things fail when they do. Some of the failure messages that appear are not at all helpful, so it's better to ask early when something fails. I'm working to update the messages for these situations but we have a long way to go.

@shauheen shauheen removed the assigned label Feb 14, 2019
@shauheen
Copy link
Contributor

@sharwell , I had assumed that @mareklinka was interested in working on this, but as I don't see a PR. Please feel free to take it away. Please let me know so that I put assigned back.

@mareklinka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shauheen yes, sorry, I don't think I'll have the time to work on this in the near future.

sharwell added a commit to sharwell/machinelearning that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2019
sharwell added a commit to sharwell/machinelearning that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2019
@shauheen
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @mareklinka , no worries.

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 24, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants