Improve documentation of ErrorTracker.Error kind field #154
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closes: 153 Co-authored-by: Manmohan Krishna <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Manmohan Krishna <[email protected]>
odarriba
requested changes
May 11, 2025
odarriba
approved these changes
May 12, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This addresses #153.
We thought about it and came to the conclusion that it would be good to change the type declaration for the module. Open for discussion, because that could potentially be a breaking change of the library if users previously had implementations of
ErrorTracker.Ignorerthat matched on non-string types (although, arguably those implementations would never have worked).