-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.9k
Schemas & client libraries. #4179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
32 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bc836aa
Initial pass at schema support
tomchristie b64340b
Add coreapi to optional requirements.
tomchristie c890ad4
Clean up test failures
tomchristie 2d28390
Add missing newline
tomchristie 744dba4
Minor docs update
tomchristie 56ece73
Version bump for coreapi in requirements
tomchristie 99adbf1
Catch SyntaxError when importing coreapi with python 3.2
tomchristie 80c595e
Add --diff to isort
tomchristie 47c7765
Import coreapi from compat
tomchristie 29e228d
Fail gracefully if attempting to use schemas without coreapi being in…
tomchristie eeffca4
Tutorial updates
tomchristie 6c60f58
Docs update
tomchristie b7fcdd2
Initial schema generation & first tutorial 7 draft
tomchristie 2e60f41
Spelling
tomchristie 2ffa145
Remove unused variable
tomchristie b709dd4
Docs tweak
tomchristie 474a23e
Merge branch 'master' into schema-support
tomchristie 4822896
Added SchemaGenerator class
tomchristie 1f76cca
Fail gracefully if coreapi is not installed and SchemaGenerator is used
tomchristie cad24b1
Schema docs, pagination controls, filter controls
tomchristie 8fb2602
Resolve NameError
tomchristie b438281
Add 'view' argument to 'get_fields()'
tomchristie 8519b4e
Remove extranous blank line
tomchristie 2f5c974
Add integration tests for schema generation
tomchristie e78753d
Only set 'encoding' if a 'form' or 'body' field exists
tomchristie 84bb5ea
Do not use schmea in tests if coreapi is not installed
tomchristie 63e8467
Inital pass at API client docs
tomchristie bdbcb33
Inital pass at API client docs
tomchristie 7236af3
More work towards client documentation
tomchristie 89540ab
Add coreapi to optional packages list
tomchristie e3ced75
Clean up API clients docs
tomchristie 12be5b3
Resolve typo
tomchristie File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,383 @@ | ||
source: schemas.py | ||
|
||
# Schemas | ||
|
||
> A machine-readable [schema] describes what resources are available via the API, what their URLs are, how they are represented and what operations they support. | ||
> | ||
> — Heroku, [JSON Schema for the Heroku Platform API][cite] | ||
|
||
API schemas are a useful tool that allow for a range of use cases, including | ||
generating reference documentation, or driving dynamic client libraries that | ||
can interact with your API. | ||
|
||
## Representing schemas internally | ||
|
||
REST framework uses [Core API][coreapi] in order to model schema information in | ||
a format-independent representation. This information can then be rendered | ||
into various different schema formats, or used to generate API documentation. | ||
|
||
When using Core API, a schema is represented as a `Document` which is the | ||
top-level container object for information about the API. Available API | ||
interactions are represented using `Link` objects. Each link includes a URL, | ||
HTTP method, and may include a list of `Field` instances, which describe any | ||
parameters that may be accepted by the API endpoint. The `Link` and `Field` | ||
instances may also include descriptions, that allow an API schema to be | ||
rendered into user documentation. | ||
|
||
Here's an example of an API description that includes a single `search` | ||
endpoint: | ||
|
||
coreapi.Document( | ||
title='Flight Search API', | ||
url='https://api.example.org/', | ||
content={ | ||
'search': coreapi.Link( | ||
url='/search/', | ||
action='get', | ||
fields=[ | ||
coreapi.Field( | ||
name='from', | ||
required=True, | ||
location='query', | ||
description='City name or airport code.' | ||
), | ||
coreapi.Field( | ||
name='to', | ||
required=True, | ||
location='query', | ||
description='City name or airport code.' | ||
), | ||
coreapi.Field( | ||
name='date', | ||
required=True, | ||
location='query', | ||
description='Flight date in "YYYY-MM-DD" format.' | ||
) | ||
], | ||
description='Return flight availability and prices.' | ||
) | ||
} | ||
) | ||
|
||
## Schema output formats | ||
|
||
In order to be presented in an HTTP response, the internal representation | ||
has to be rendered into the actual bytes that are used in the response. | ||
|
||
[Core JSON][corejson] is designed as a canonical format for use with Core API. | ||
REST framework includes a renderer class for handling this media type, which | ||
is available as `renderers.CoreJSONRenderer`. | ||
|
||
Other schema formats such as [Open API][open-api] (Formerly "Swagger"), | ||
[JSON HyperSchema][json-hyperschema], or [API Blueprint][api-blueprint] can | ||
also be supported by implementing a custom renderer class. | ||
|
||
## Schemas vs Hypermedia | ||
|
||
It's worth pointing out here that Core API can also be used to model hypermedia | ||
responses, which present an alternative interaction style to API schemas. | ||
|
||
With an API schema, the entire available interface is presented up-front | ||
as a single endpoint. Responses to individual API endpoints are then typically | ||
presented as plain data, without any further interactions contained in each | ||
response. | ||
|
||
With Hypermedia, the client is instead presented with a document containing | ||
both data and available interactions. Each interaction results in a new | ||
document, detailing both the current state and the available interactions. | ||
|
||
Further information and support on building Hypermedia APIs with REST framework | ||
is planned for a future version. | ||
|
||
--- | ||
|
||
# Adding a schema | ||
|
||
You'll need to install the `coreapi` package in order to add schema support | ||
for REST framework. | ||
|
||
pip install coreapi | ||
|
||
REST framework includes functionality for auto-generating a schema, | ||
or allows you to specify one explicitly. There are a few different ways to | ||
add a schema to your API, depending on exactly what you need. | ||
|
||
## Using DefaultRouter | ||
|
||
If you're using `DefaultRouter` then you can include an auto-generated schema, | ||
simply by adding a `schema_title` argument to the router. | ||
|
||
router = DefaultRouter(schema_title='Server Monitoring API') | ||
|
||
The schema will be included at the root URL, `/`, and presented to clients | ||
that include the Core JSON media type in their `Accept` header. | ||
|
||
$ http http://127.0.0.1:8000/ Accept:application/vnd.coreapi+json | ||
HTTP/1.0 200 OK | ||
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS | ||
Content-Type: application/vnd.coreapi+json | ||
|
||
{ | ||
"_meta": { | ||
"title": "Server Monitoring API" | ||
}, | ||
"_type": "document", | ||
... | ||
} | ||
|
||
This is a great zero-configuration option for when you want to get up and | ||
running really quickly. If you want a little more flexibility over the | ||
schema output then you'll need to consider using `SchemaGenerator` instead. | ||
|
||
## Using SchemaGenerator | ||
|
||
The most common way to add a schema to your API is to use the `SchemaGenerator` | ||
class to auto-generate the `Document` instance, and to return that from a view. | ||
|
||
This option gives you the flexibility of setting up the schema endpoint | ||
with whatever behaviour you want. For example, you can apply different | ||
permission, throttling or authentication policies to the schema endpoint. | ||
|
||
Here's an example of using `SchemaGenerator` together with a view to | ||
return the schema. | ||
|
||
**views.py:** | ||
|
||
from rest_framework.decorators import api_view, renderer_classes | ||
from rest_framework import renderers, schemas | ||
|
||
generator = schemas.SchemaGenerator(title='Bookings API') | ||
|
||
@api_view() | ||
@renderer_classes([renderers.CoreJSONRenderer]) | ||
def schema_view(request): | ||
return generator.get_schema() | ||
|
||
**urls.py:** | ||
|
||
urlpatterns = [ | ||
url('/', schema_view), | ||
... | ||
] | ||
|
||
You can also serve different schemas to different users, depending on the | ||
permissions they have available. This approach can be used to ensure that | ||
unauthenticated requests are presented with a different schema to | ||
authenticated requests, or to ensure that different parts of the API are | ||
made visible to different users depending on their role. | ||
|
||
In order to present a schema with endpoints filtered by user permissions, | ||
you need to pass the `request` argument to the `get_schema()` method, like so: | ||
|
||
@api_view() | ||
@renderer_classes([renderers.CoreJSONRenderer]) | ||
def schema_view(request): | ||
return generator.get_schema(request=request) | ||
|
||
## Explicit schema definition | ||
|
||
An alternative to the auto-generated approach is to specify the API schema | ||
explicitly, by declaring a `Document` object in your codebase. Doing so is a | ||
little more work, but ensures that you have full control over the schema | ||
representation. | ||
|
||
import coreapi | ||
from rest_framework.decorators import api_view, renderer_classes | ||
from rest_framework import renderers | ||
|
||
schema = coreapi.Document( | ||
title='Bookings API', | ||
content={ | ||
... | ||
} | ||
) | ||
|
||
@api_view() | ||
@renderer_classes([renderers.CoreJSONRenderer]) | ||
def schema_view(request): | ||
return schema | ||
|
||
## Static schema file | ||
|
||
A final option is to write your API schema as a static file, using one | ||
of the available formats, such as Core JSON or Open API. | ||
|
||
You could then either: | ||
|
||
* Write a schema definition as a static file, and [serve the static file directly][static-files]. | ||
* Write a schema definition that is loaded using `Core API`, and then | ||
rendered to one of many available formats, depending on the client request. | ||
|
||
--- | ||
|
||
# API Reference | ||
|
||
## SchemaGenerator | ||
|
||
A class that deals with introspecting your API views, which can be used to | ||
generate a schema. | ||
|
||
Typically you'll instantiate `SchemaGenerator` with a single argument, like so: | ||
|
||
generator = SchemaGenerator(title='Stock Prices API') | ||
|
||
Arguments: | ||
|
||
* `title` - The name of the API. **required** | ||
* `patterns` - A list of URLs to inspect when generating the schema. Defaults to the project's URL conf. | ||
* `urlconf` - A URL conf module name to use when generating the schema. Defaults to `settings.ROOT_URLCONF`. | ||
|
||
### get_schema() | ||
|
||
Returns a `coreapi.Document` instance that represents the API schema. | ||
|
||
@api_view | ||
@renderer_classes([renderers.CoreJSONRenderer]) | ||
def schema_view(request): | ||
return generator.get_schema() | ||
|
||
Arguments: | ||
|
||
* `request` - The incoming request. Optionally used if you want to apply per-user permissions to the schema-generation. | ||
|
||
--- | ||
|
||
## Core API | ||
|
||
This documentation gives a brief overview of the components within the `coreapi` | ||
package that are used to represent an API schema. | ||
|
||
Note that these classes are imported from the `coreapi` package, rather than | ||
from the `rest_framework` package. | ||
|
||
### Document | ||
|
||
Represents a container for the API schema. | ||
|
||
#### `title` | ||
|
||
A name for the API. | ||
|
||
#### `url` | ||
|
||
A canonical URL for the API. | ||
|
||
#### `content` | ||
|
||
A dictionary, containing the `Link` objects that the schema contains. | ||
|
||
In order to provide more structure to the schema, the `content` dictionary | ||
may be nested, typically to a second level. For example: | ||
|
||
content={ | ||
"bookings": { | ||
"list": Link(...), | ||
"create": Link(...), | ||
... | ||
}, | ||
"venues": { | ||
"list": Link(...), | ||
... | ||
}, | ||
... | ||
} | ||
|
||
### Link | ||
|
||
Represents an individual API endpoint. | ||
|
||
#### `url` | ||
|
||
The URL of the endpoint. May be a URI template, such as `/users/{username}/`. | ||
|
||
#### `action` | ||
|
||
The HTTP method associated with the endpoint. Note that URLs that support | ||
more than one HTTP method, should correspond to a single `Link` for each. | ||
|
||
#### `fields` | ||
|
||
A list of `Field` instances, describing the available parameters on the input. | ||
|
||
#### `description` | ||
|
||
A short description of the meaning and intended usage of the endpoint. | ||
|
||
### Field | ||
|
||
Represents a single input parameter on a given API endpoint. | ||
|
||
#### `name` | ||
|
||
A descriptive name for the input. | ||
|
||
#### `required` | ||
|
||
A boolean, indicated if the client is required to included a value, or if | ||
the parameter can be omitted. | ||
|
||
#### `location` | ||
|
||
Determines how the information is encoded into the request. Should be one of | ||
the following strings: | ||
|
||
**"path"** | ||
|
||
Included in a templated URI. For example a `url` value of `/products/{product_code}/` could be used together with a `"path"` field, to handle API inputs in a URL path such as `/products/slim-fit-jeans/`. | ||
|
||
These fields will normally correspond with [named arguments in the project URL conf][named-arguments]. | ||
|
||
**"query"** | ||
|
||
Included as a URL query parameter. For example `?search=sale`. Typically for `GET` requests. | ||
|
||
These fields will normally correspond with pagination and filtering controls on a view. | ||
|
||
**"form"** | ||
|
||
Included in the request body, as a single item of a JSON object or HTML form. For example `{"colour": "blue", ...}`. Typically for `POST`, `PUT` and `PATCH` requests. Multiple `"form"` fields may be included on a single link. | ||
|
||
These fields will normally correspond with serializer fields on a view. | ||
|
||
**"body"** | ||
|
||
Included as the complete request body. Typically for `POST`, `PUT` and `PATCH` requests. No more than one `"body"` field may exist on a link. May not be used together with `"form"` fields. | ||
|
||
These fields will normally correspond with views that use `ListSerializer` to validate the request input, or with file upload views. | ||
|
||
#### `encoding` | ||
|
||
**"application/json"** | ||
|
||
JSON encoded request content. Corresponds to views using `JSONParser`. | ||
Valid only if either one or more `location="form"` fields, or a single | ||
`location="body"` field is included on the `Link`. | ||
|
||
**"multipart/form-data"** | ||
|
||
Multipart encoded request content. Corresponds to views using `MultiPartParser`. | ||
Valid only if one or more `location="form"` fields is included on the `Link`. | ||
|
||
**"application/x-www-form-urlencoded"** | ||
|
||
URL encoded request content. Corresponds to views using `FormParser`. Valid | ||
only if one or more `location="form"` fields is included on the `Link`. | ||
|
||
**"application/octet-stream"** | ||
|
||
Binary upload request content. Corresponds to views using `FileUploadParser`. | ||
Valid only if a `location="body"` field is included on the `Link`. | ||
|
||
#### `description` | ||
|
||
A short description of the meaning and intended usage of the input field. | ||
|
||
|
||
[cite]: https://blog.heroku.com/archives/2014/1/8/json_schema_for_heroku_platform_api | ||
[coreapi]: http://www.coreapi.org/ | ||
[corejson]: http://www.coreapi.org/specification/encoding/#core-json-encoding | ||
[open-api]: https://openapis.org/ | ||
[json-hyperschema]: http://json-schema.org/latest/json-schema-hypermedia.html | ||
[api-blueprint]: https://apiblueprint.org/ | ||
[static-files]: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/howto/static-files/ | ||
[named-arguments]: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/http/urls/#named-groups |
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does
SchemaGenerator
work with any DRFAPIView
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is awesome. 💯