Skip to content

Slurm over-subscription #148

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jul 2, 2025
Merged

Slurm over-subscription #148

merged 12 commits into from
Jul 2, 2025

Conversation

bcumming
Copy link
Member

Based on internal Confluence notes: https://confluence.cscs.ch/spaces/VCUE/pages/894961135/Parallel+srun+calls

I have put this in a branch on the main repo for @jpcoles-cscs to easily contribute to.

@bcumming bcumming requested a review from jpcoles-cscs June 11, 2025 10:47
@bcumming bcumming requested review from msimberg and RMeli as code owners June 11, 2025 10:47
@bcumming bcumming marked this pull request as draft June 11, 2025 10:47
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

@finkandreas
Copy link
Collaborator

finkandreas commented Jun 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I would add in the example to the srun calls also the flag --output "out-%J.log" for a reasonable default for stdout/stderr redirection of each srun call.

I think it's easier for people to remove flags, instead of searching for the correct flag in the manpages (although --output and --error should be quite well known).

@bcumming bcumming marked this pull request as ready for review July 1, 2025 12:27
finkandreas
finkandreas requested changes Jul 1, 2025
View reviewed changes
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

@finkandreas finkandreas mentioned this pull request Jul 1, 2025
Merged
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

bcumming pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2025
@finkandreas
SLURM -> Slurm (#173)
87bd8ff 
With #148 it is suggested to rename SLURM -> Slurm. This is an accompanying PR to change it also on every other page for consistency.
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

2 similar comments
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 1, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 2, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

@bcumming bcumming merged commit 73d7ee4 into main Jul 2, 2025
1 check passed
@bcumming bcumming deleted the slurm-multi-job branch July 2, 2025 07:24
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 2, 2025

preview available: https://docs.tds.cscs.ch/148

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jpcoles jpcoles jpcoles approved these changes

@finkandreas finkandreas finkandreas approved these changes

@jpcoles-cscs jpcoles-cscs Awaiting requested review from jpcoles-cscs

@msimberg msimberg Awaiting requested review from msimberg msimberg is a code owner

@RMeli RMeli Awaiting requested review from RMeli RMeli is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@bcumming @finkandreas @jpcoles @jpcoles-cscs