Skip to content

Conversation

Abdel-Monaam-Aouini
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@UlisesGascon UlisesGascon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need a team agreement for this rules. Also this will add a lot of git merge conflict with the current open PRs.

Copy link
Member

@bjohansebas bjohansebas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would conflict with the discussion about implementing standard or neostandard, as they also format the code.

Co-authored-by: Ulises Gascón <[email protected]>
@wesleytodd
Copy link
Member

Yeah, we have avoided this sort of action for years. I dont think we should change our stance on this now before we make a more cross cutting effort to fix this. Closing for now, but if we reconsider (which I would oppose prettier pretty hard, so seems unlikely to me but maybe others can convince me) then we can re-open.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants