Skip to content

gh actions #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

gh actions #2

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fireharp
Copy link
Owner

@fireharp fireharp commented Mar 30, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced an automated quality assurance process for code contributions. This new system verifies incoming changes through a series of checks to help maintain a robust and reliable experience.
  • Tests

    • Integrated real-time test validations, including coverage assessments, to ensure that all updates meet our quality standards before final integration.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 30, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow has been added to automate checks on pull requests targeting the main branch. The workflow, defined in a single YAML file, includes three jobs: lint, test, and build. Each job sets up the environment, executes its task (linting, running tests with coverage requirements, or building a binary), and provides feedback. The workflow supports configurable parameters for Go and task versions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/.../pr-checks.yml Added a workflow ("PR Checks") that triggers on pull requests to main. Introduces three jobs—lint (code linting using nilaway and golangci-lint), test (runs tests with a 70% coverage threshold), and build (builds binary and checks goreleaser configuration). Supports input parameters for Go and task versions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant PR as Pull Request
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant Lint as Lint Job
    participant Test as Test Job
    participant Build as Build Job

    PR->>GH: Open PR targeting "main"
    GH->>Lint: Trigger lint job
    GH->>Test: Trigger test job
    GH->>Build: Trigger build job
    Lint-->>GH: Return lint results
    Test-->>GH: Return test results & coverage
    Build-->>GH: Return build artifact & config check
Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a joyful skip,
Hopping through workflows on a code trip.
Linting, testing, building with a cheer,
Every PR makes my ears stand clear.
In fields of code, I dance with delight,
Celebrating changes from morning to night!
🐰✨


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (4)

17-43: Lint Job Setup and Action Version Update

The lint job is well structured with the standard steps: code checkout, setting up go-task, configuring the Go environment, installing additional tools (nilaway), and running linting. However, note that the step using golangci/golangci-lint-action@v3 (lines 34–37) is flagged as outdated by static analysis. Consider upgrading to a newer version (for example, @v4 if available) to benefit from the latest updates and increased compatibility.

-      - name: Run golangci-lint
-        uses: golangci/golangci-lint-action@v3
-        with:
-          version: v1.64.5
-          args: --timeout=5m
+      - name: Run golangci-lint
+        uses: golangci/golangci-lint-action@v4  # Upgrade to a newer version for improved compatibility
+        with:
+          version: v1.64.5
+          args: --timeout=5m
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

34-34: the runner of "golangci/golangci-lint-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


60-63: Artifact Upload Action Update

The "Upload coverage as artifact" step employs actions/upload-artifact@v3, which has been flagged as outdated. To ensure optimal functionality and compatibility with current GitHub Actions runners, consider updating this step to a later version (e.g., @v4).

-      - name: Upload coverage as artifact
-        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
+      - name: Upload coverage as artifact
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4  # Updated to a newer version for better compatibility
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

60-60: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


64-70: Coverage Threshold Feedback Enhancement

The coverage check step correctly calculates the total test coverage and provides feedback if it falls below the 70% threshold. If the intention is to enforce the threshold strictly, consider failing the step (e.g., by exiting with a nonzero status) when coverage is insufficient. This would automatically block the merge if low coverage is detected.


72-91: Build Job Configuration

The build job is organized appropriately, with steps for checking out the code, setting up the Go environment through go-task and actions/setup-go, building the binary, and verifying the goreleaser configuration. For reproducibility, you might consider pinning the goreleaser version instead of always installing the latest version.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9951c2 and fdefc33.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml

34-34: the runner of "golangci/golangci-lint-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


60-60: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pr-checks.yml (2)

1-2: Workflow Naming: Clear and Descriptive

The workflow is named "PR Checks", which aligns well with its purpose of automating checks for pull requests.


3-16: Trigger and Input Configuration

The workflow is configured to trigger on pull requests to the main branch and supports workflow_call with configurable inputs (go-version and task-version). This provides flexibility for other workflows to invoke these checks. The configuration is clear and well-structured.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant