This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 25, 2025. It is now read-only.
SurfaceFrame root DisplayLists will no longer prepare an RTree #48422
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The root slice of a surface frame was requesting the construction of an RTree from its DisplayList when it was built from a layer tree, but since the layer tree already does branch culling, it would not benefit from any further culling during
DisplayList::Dispatch
. Further, if there are platform views present in the layer tree then they will need an RTree to accurately convey "pixel ownership" information to the platform, but the root slice lives below any and all platform views, so it is the only slice that doesn't need an RTree for that case.The cost of having an RTree in that slice was the accumulation of information and lists of rects that would never prove useful.