Addition of TOCs in Markdown files

[jvdp1]

Some specs already contain multiple functions. So I thought it could be good to add TOCs for clarity.
Of course, it can be discussed/modified/removed, as usual.

[nshaffer]

Nothing obviously amiss, except the vim plugin magic comment thing.

Links for each routine are obviously useful and good to have. Subsection links (Description, etc.) don't seem useful, though.

[jvdp1]

Nothing obviously amiss, except the vim plugin magic comment thing.

Links for each routine are obviously useful and good to have. Subsection links (Description, etc.) don't seem useful, though.

Thanks @nshaffer for the review. I will remove Vim comments and subsection links (Their are indeed all the same).

[milancurcic]

Looks great! My only suggestion is to remove the "Implemented" heading from the top of each spec file--it serves no purpose, and in some files it's incorrect (for example, in quadrature it lists some functions that aren't implemented).

[certik]

Looks good to me.

…

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020, at 5:24 PM, Milan Curcic wrote: ***@***.**** approved this pull request. Looks great! My only suggestion is to remove the "Implemented" heading from the top of each spec file--it serves no purpose, and in some files it's incorrect (for example, in quadrature it lists some functions that aren't implemented). — You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#158 (review)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAFAWBSHU6KY7IUAFNJYD3RIP3JZANCNFSM4LJWBG2A>.

[jvdp1]

Looks great! My only suggestion is to remove the "Implemented" heading from the top of each spec file--it serves no purpose, and in some files it's incorrect (for example, in quadrature it lists some functions that aren't implemented).

Thank you @milancurcic. Suggestion applied.

[jvdp1]

Ok. I will merge. Thank you for your comments.