Speed up add episode

[prasmussen15]

🚀	This description was created by Ellipsis for commit 8902f18

Summary:

This PR optimizes episode addition by enhancing deduplication, refining bulk processing, and improving search functionalities across multiple files.

Key points:

• Optimizes episode addition by enhancing node and edge deduplication and resolution.
• Leverages asynchronous operations for improved performance.
• Updates examples/podcast/podcast_runner.py for bulk message processing and to process episodes without bulk by default.
• Refines graphiti_core/graphiti.py by removing unnecessary imports and improving deduplication.
• Enhances add_episode and add_episode_bulk for better deduplication and performance.
• Improves resolve_extracted_nodes and dedupe_extracted_nodes in graphiti_core/utils/maintenance/node_operations.py.
• Introduces and enhances resolve_extracted_edges and resolve_extracted_nodes functions.
• Enhances graphiti_core/prompts/dedupe_edges.py and dedupe_nodes.py with new prompts.
• Improves search functionalities in graphiti_core/search/search.py and search_utils.py.
• Adds chunk_edges_by_nodes in graphiti_core/utils/utils.py for better edge handling.
• Refines dedupe_nodes_bulk in graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py to remove unnecessary tuple element.
• Improves bulk processing in graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py.

---

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to ff9567b in 1 minute and 0 seconds

More details

• Looked at 1266 lines of code in 12 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 11 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:185

• Draft comment:
  Inconsistent indentation for method parameters. Ensure consistent indentation for better readability. This issue is also present in other methods like add_episode, add_episode_bulk, _search, and get_nodes_by_query.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The code in graphiti_core/graphiti.py has inconsistent indentation for method parameters. This can lead to confusion and should be standardized.

2. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:305

• Draft comment:
  Redundant logging of extracted nodes. The log statement on line 305 is unnecessary as the same information is logged on line 290.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In graphiti_core/graphiti.py, the add_episode method logs extracted nodes twice, which is redundant. This should be corrected to avoid unnecessary logging.

3. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:354

• Draft comment:
  Ensure expired_at is set only when invalid_at is not None. The current check might not cover all cases where invalid_at is None.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In graphiti_core/graphiti.py, the add_episode method has a potential issue with the expired_at field. It should be set only if invalid_at is not None, but the current check might not cover all cases. This should be reviewed for correctness.

4. graphiti_core/prompts/dedupe_edges.py:46

• Draft comment:
  Misleading comment: "deduplicate facts" should be "deduplicate edges" for clarity.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In graphiti_core/prompts/dedupe_edges.py, the v1 function has a misleading comment about deduplicating facts instead of edges. This should be corrected for clarity.

5. graphiti_core/search/search_utils.py:110

• Draft comment:
  Potential issue with MATCH clause: Assumes relationship exists between nodes with specific UUIDs, which might not always be the case. Review for correctness.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  In graphiti_core/search/search_utils.py, the edge_similarity_search function has a potential issue with the MATCH clause. It assumes that the relationship exists between nodes with specific UUIDs, which might not always be the case. This should be reviewed for correctness.

6. examples/podcast/podcast_runner.py:80

• Draft comment:
  Avoid hardcoding credentials in the code. Use environment variables or a secure vault to manage sensitive information like passwords.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  The comment is not relevant to the changes made in the diff. The code already uses environment variables for credentials, which aligns with the comment's suggestion. The diff only changes the range of messages being processed, so the comment does not address any new or changed code.
  I might be missing the context of the entire file, but based on the diff and the provided file content, the comment seems irrelevant to the changes made.
  The provided file content confirms that credentials are managed using environment variables, so the comment is indeed irrelevant to the changes made in the diff.
  The comment should be deleted as it is not relevant to the changes made in the diff and the code already follows the suggested practice of using environment variables for credentials.

7. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:185

• Draft comment:
  Use 4 spaces for indentation for parameters to follow Python's idiomatic style.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The function retrieve_episodes in graphiti.py is not following idiomatic Python indentation for parameters.

8. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:215

• Draft comment:
  Use 4 spaces for indentation for parameters to follow Python's idiomatic style.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The function add_episode in graphiti.py is not following idiomatic Python indentation for parameters.

9. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:415

• Draft comment:
  Use 4 spaces for indentation for parameters to follow Python's idiomatic style.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The function add_episode_bulk in graphiti.py is not following idiomatic Python indentation for parameters.

10. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:580

• Draft comment:
  Use 4 spaces for indentation for parameters to follow Python's idiomatic style.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The function _search in graphiti.py is not following idiomatic Python indentation for parameters.

11. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:591

• Draft comment:
  Use 4 spaces for indentation for parameters to follow Python's idiomatic style.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The function get_nodes_by_query in graphiti.py is not following idiomatic Python indentation for parameters.

Workflow ID: wflow_cRWkQolR7Di6jr4k

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on b26a430 in 44 seconds

More details

• Looked at 392 lines of code in 4 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 4 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:183

• Draft comment:
  Unnecessary whitespace changes in function definitions and calls. Revert to maintain consistency. This applies to other functions in this file as well.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The code contains multiple instances of unnecessary whitespace changes, particularly in function definitions and calls. These changes do not contribute to the functionality or readability of the code and should be reverted to maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase.

2. graphiti_core/search/search.py:66

• Draft comment:
  Unnecessary whitespace changes in function definitions and calls. Revert to maintain consistency. This applies to other functions in this file as well.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The code contains multiple instances of unnecessary whitespace changes, particularly in function definitions and calls. These changes do not contribute to the functionality or readability of the code and should be reverted to maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase.

3. graphiti_core/search/search_utils.py:99

• Draft comment:
  Unnecessary whitespace changes in function definitions and calls. Revert to maintain consistency. This applies to other functions in this file as well.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The code contains multiple instances of unnecessary whitespace changes, particularly in function definitions and calls. These changes do not contribute to the functionality or readability of the code and should be reverted to maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase.

4. graphiti_core/utils/maintenance/edge_operations.py:50

• Draft comment:
  Unnecessary whitespace changes in function definitions and calls. Revert to maintain consistency. This applies to other functions in this file as well.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The code contains multiple instances of unnecessary whitespace changes, particularly in function definitions and calls. These changes do not contribute to the functionality or readability of the code and should be reverted to maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase.

Workflow ID: wflow_OgSwDMezcNpTrIhy

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 0f52f74 in 21 seconds

More details

• Looked at 67 lines of code in 4 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. graphiti_core/utils/maintenance/node_operations.py:196

• Draft comment:
  Setting summary to an empty string instead of None may lead to unintended behavior if other parts of the codebase expect None to signify the absence of a summary. Consider reviewing the implications of this change.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The change in resolve_extracted_node function sets the default value of summary to an empty string instead of None. This could lead to unintended behavior if the rest of the codebase expects None to signify the absence of a summary.

2. graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py:128

• Draft comment:
  The defaultdict import is removed but not used in the code. Ensure that any unused imports are removed to keep the code clean.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The code in graphiti_core/utils/bulk_utils.py has a repeated logging statement that logs the extracted nodes twice, which violates the DRY principle.

3. graphiti_core/utils/maintenance/node_operations.py:196

• Draft comment:
  The variable summary is assigned a default value of None but is later reassigned to an empty string. Consider initializing it directly with an empty string to avoid redundancy.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The code in graphiti_core/utils/maintenance/node_operations.py has a repeated logging statement that logs the extracted nodes twice, which violates the DRY principle.

Workflow ID: wflow_GqGHnJi67wmkI8Xi

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 8902f18 in 24 seconds

More details

• Looked at 177 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 5 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:183

• Draft comment:
  The indentation for method parameters is inconsistent with PEP 8 guidelines. Consider using 4 spaces for continuation lines for better readability. This issue is present in multiple methods.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The indentation in the method signatures is inconsistent with PEP 8 style guidelines, which recommend a 4-space indentation for continuation lines. This inconsistency is present in multiple methods across the file.

2. graphiti_core/utils/maintenance/node_operations.py:31

• Draft comment:
  The indentation for method parameters is inconsistent with PEP 8 guidelines. Consider using 4 spaces for continuation lines for better readability. This issue is present in multiple methods.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The indentation in the method signatures is inconsistent with PEP 8 style guidelines, which recommend a 4-space indentation for continuation lines. This inconsistency is present in multiple methods across the file.

3. graphiti_core/utils/maintenance/node_operations.py:196

• Draft comment:
  The variable summary is initialized with a default value of an empty string, which is unnecessary since it is immediately overwritten. Consider simplifying this.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The variable summary is initialized with a default value of an empty string, which is unnecessary since it is immediately overwritten. This can be simplified.

4. graphiti_core/graphiti.py:183

• Draft comment:
  Function parameters should be aligned with the opening parenthesis for better readability. This issue is also present in other functions like add_episode, add_episode_bulk, _search, and get_nodes_by_query.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The code has inconsistent indentation for function parameters, which is not idiomatic.

5. graphiti_core/utils/maintenance/node_operations.py:31

• Draft comment:
  Function parameters should be aligned with the opening parenthesis for better readability. This issue is also present in other functions like extract_json_nodes, extract_nodes, dedupe_extracted_nodes, resolve_extracted_nodes, resolve_extracted_node, and dedupe_node_list.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The code has inconsistent indentation for function parameters, which is not idiomatic.

Workflow ID: wflow_qMUTwmBBYcGbrXq2

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.