Get rid of the scroll-to-top button???

[To1ne]

Do we still need it?

Especially on mobile I don't love how it looks and gets in the way of the content:

And on full screen is floating somewhere fairly random:

[To1ne]

@dscho @jvns Any of you an opinion from UX perspective whether this button is useful?

[dscho]

I never used it, but I am but a sample of 1...

Probably an (anonymized) telemetry campaign could tell us whether this button is used at all.

Or we could apply the "complaint-driven software development" style: remove it, and if there is enormous backlash, revert the removal swiftly.

[Paulie-Aditya]

Probably an (anonymized) telemetry campaign could tell us whether this button is used at all.

do let me know of the results as well, would love to contribute!

[dscho]

@Paulie-Aditya since everything that contains the word "telemetry" seems to be a major trigger for a certain small (yet very, very loud) subset of Git users, I am actually more in favor of the "Just Do It, and Revert It If Necessary" approach.

[dscho]

So since I know pretty next to nothing about web design and current trends, I asked Copilot Researcher to educate me.

Here is what it wrote

The Status and Relevance of the 'Scroll To Top' Button in Web Design: 2025 Analysis

Introduction

The "Scroll To Top" button---also known as the "Back to Top" button---has been a staple of web navigation for well over a decade. As users traverse ever-longer and more content-rich web pages, this seemingly simple interface element has offered them a quick mechanism to return to the top of the page, sidestepping repeated, laborious swiping or dragging. Yet, the evolution of web design is relentless, shaped by changing patterns of user behavior, breakthroughs in device capabilities, shifting trends in user experience (UX), and growing awareness of accessibility requirements. In 2025, the continued relevance and implementation of the "Scroll To Top" button is both a practical and philosophical concern among web developers, designers, digital strategists, business owners, and UX researchers.

This report provides an exhaustive examination of the current landscape for the "Scroll To Top" button, synthesizing trend analyses, expert opinion, examples from high-profile websites, and technical best practices. Sections are devoted to usage statistics, UX importance, accessibility guidelines, differences across device types, code implementation, and the ongoing debate around its necessity. Tables and summarized data are interwoven with analytical prose to ensure clarity without sacrificing nuance. Throughout, recent web sources and industry voices are referenced as demanded by the latest standards of professional research.

1. Current Usage Trends of the 'Scroll To Top' Button in 2025

Recent research and website audits consistently find the "Scroll To Top" button present on a wide spectrum of websites in 2025, though its ubiquity and implementation nuances vary by context, industry, and even web traffic profile. While not as universally deployed as core navigation bars or search functions, its adoption remains robust among content-heavy platforms, e-commerce storefronts, news outlets, and long-scroll landing pages. BuiltWith, a web technology usage aggregator, indicates that widgets such as "Simple Scroll to Top Button" and "Smooth Back-To-Top Button" continue to be employed on tens of thousands of sites as of September 2025, with no significant downward trend over the past two years.

Several factors help explain this endurance:

1. Content Length and Page Depth: The ongoing trend toward long-scroll and single-page web architectures has increased overall page depth, making "Scroll To Top" utilities both visible and functional.
2. Device Usage Patterns: With mobile traffic dominating global internet access, the ergonomic challenge of returning to the top of a lengthy page with touch gestures alone remains an issue for many users.
3. Modularity and Ease of Integration: Modern website builders, CMSs, and plugin marketplaces offer fast, code-free ways to add such a feature, reducing deployment friction for web developers.

However, while the core concept persists, the visual presentation, behavioral subtleties, and triggers for these buttons have evolved considerably. For instance, many modern implementations now auto-hide the control until a user has scrolled past a certain viewport threshold. Others integrate fluid, animated transitions that match the brand's overall design language, aiming to reduce UI intrusiveness. A small but growing subset of highly innovative websites, particularly those employing immersive or non-linear navigation paradigms, are forgoing the button entirely in favor of alternative or experimental scroll and navigation schemes.

In sum, the "Scroll To Top" button in 2025 is not an obsolete artifact, but neither is it a default for every site type. Its continued prevalence is signaled by robust plugin usage, broad adoption in content-heavy verticals, and adaptation to new interaction paradigms.

2. Usability Importance of the 'Scroll To Top' Button

The central usability value of the "Scroll To Top" button stems from its ability to provide a simple, accessible solution to a recurring navigation pain point---returning efficiently to the start of a long page. This is especially salient in interfaces where top-mounted navigation anchors, search fields, announcement banners, or menus necessitate frequent user access.

Key usability advantages include:

• Efficiency: The button minimizes physical scrolling effort, especially on mobile touchscreens, where repeated swiping may be fatiguing or imprecise.
• Orientation: It provides a clear, universally recognized action to restore view context, particularly after deep content exploration.
• Non-Disruptive Navigation: Crucially, it introduces rapid vertical mobility without disrupting the user's cognitive flow, as it obviates the need to manually scroll and scan.

Numerous UX case studies and blog analyses have shown that the inclusion of a well-designed "Scroll To Top" button correlates with reduced abandonment rates on long-form content sites, increased navigational ease as reported in user surveys, and improved engagement metrics such as deeper scroll depth and longer average session duration. The non-intrusive, opt-in nature of the button (typically appearing only after a minimal distance scrolled) helps to provide assistance without clutter. Emerline, a digital agency tracking UI/UX trends, lists this feature among "micro-interactions that enhance navigational comfort" and underscore its position as a competitive usability differentiator when properly implemented.

Yet, the feature's importance is not absolute. Its utility is highly contextual---sites with shallow page structures, fixed headers offering persistent navigation, or sophisticated tab-based layouts may derive little benefit from its inclusion. For those platforms, the button risks redundancy or even visual noise.

3. UX Expert Opinions and Perspectives

In 2025, thought leaders in UX are unified in assessing the "Scroll To Top" button's role as a contextually beneficial, but non-essential, feature---one whose value hinges on page architecture and user flows. Several in-depth UX roundtables, including discussions recorded on UX StackExchange and in the latest guides by Somnio Software and Useberry, show that the consensus has shifted from blanket recommendations toward a nuanced appreciation for user intent and content hierarchy.

The major expert positions can be summarized as follows:

• Support for Content-Heavy and Infinite Pages: Jakob Nielsen and other prominent usability advocates stress the necessity of such aids for infinite scroll news feeds, blogs, and lengthy documentation repositories. Here, a prominent "Back to Top" button acts as a "lifeline" for users, preventing loss of context and frustration.
• Conditional Visibility and Smart Triggers: Designers now recommend intelligent display triggers---showing the button only after significant scroll depth and hiding it during modal or overlay interactions. The button should not distract or obstruct key content, which requires well-calibrated UI logic.
• Mobile-First Considerations: The mobile usability gurus at PortoTheme emphasize the heightened value of "Scroll To Top" for phone users, given the ergonomics of touchscreen scrolling vis-à-vis mouse wheel navigation on desktop.
• Non-Essential for Minimal, Fixed-Nav Sites: On short, anchor-linked, or one-page sites with sticky top menus, the feature may be omitted without consequence---indeed, sometimes its presence may create unnecessary redundancy or competition for attention.

A key refrain, echoed across UX interviews and design essays, is that the feature must be a supplement, not a crutch, for effective navigation. Where possible, it should serve as an unobtrusive fallback, not the primary means for vertical mobility.

4. Web Design Trend Reports Covering Scroll Behaviors and Navigation

Every year, major web design publications, trend compendia, and agency blogs analyze the shifting sands of UI convention. In 2025, the implications for "Scroll To Top" functionality are especially acute, given several overlapping currents in scroll-centric web experiences.

Prominent trend reports from Bubble.io, Mockplus, and Digital Sprout underline the following patterns:

• Persistence of Long-Scroll Pages: The demand for immersive storytelling, visual portfolios, and deep product catalogs continues to drive "infinite scroll" or "endless page" paradigms. Here, "Scroll To Top" controls may appear not only on the lower right, but sometimes as floating tabs or cards that morph into contextual navigation tools.
• Minimalist Navigation and Skeuomorphic Anchors: Where minimalist trends promote clean interfaces, the "Scroll To Top" button often assumes a ghosted, semi-transparent look, shrinking from view when not needed. Others employ skeuomorphic visual cues (e.g., floating arrows, pulsing dots) to signal secondary navigation options without competing for primary attention.
• Accessibility and Inclusivity: With accessibility now a mainstream business consideration, best practice guides increasingly demand that "Scroll To Top" controls be keyboard, screen reader, and ARIA-friendly, with focus management and predictable placement.

Reports from HTML Burger and Design Shack also spotlight inventive navigation layouts that forgo the classic "Scroll To Top" button in favor of persistent mini-menus, gesture navigation, or context-aware overlays---especially on experimental and agency portfolio sites. But their analysis clarifies that for "all-purpose information sites and e-commerce," the tried-and-true button remains widespread, foregrounding function over experimental flourish.

5. Accessibility Considerations for the "Scroll To Top" Button

Accessibility regulations such as WCAG 2.2, reinforced by lawsuits and increasing public awareness, put fresh pressure on designers to make every navigation element truly usable for all---a bar not always met by off-the-shelf "Scroll To Top" widgets.

Key accessibility practices in 2025 include:

• Keyboard Navigation: Ensuring that the button is reachable by 'Tab' navigation and can be activated with Enter/Space keys---not solely by pointer devices.
• Screen Reader Announcements: Employing ARIA-labels (e.g., aria-label="Back to top") so that screen readers describe its purpose and state, while also avoiding non-essential verbosity.
• Focus Management: The destination after activating the button should ideally restore keyboard or screen reader focus to the "main" site header or the very first interactive element, not simply scroll visually.
• Consistent Placement & Contrast: The control must be predictably placed (typically lower right on desktop, floating on mobile), with sufficient contrast and size for visually impaired users.
• Nonintrusiveness for Users with Cognitive Disabilities: Avoiding jumpy animations or sudden reflows when showing/hiding the button is important for those with motion or processing differences.

Many plugin authors and frameworks now explicitly market their widgets as "a11y-ready," complete with code snippets that show proper focus handling and ARIA tags. Yet, compliance is uneven---some custom-coded implementations still fall short, especially on highly stylized sites or those reusing legacy JavaScript code.

Prominent accessibility advocates on Digital A11y and UX StackExchange affirm that the functionality itself is inclusive when implemented per modern guidelines, but urge regular auditing, especially as site content and layouts change over time.

6. Mobile vs. Desktop Usage Patterns

Industry analytics and UX research highlight a growing divergence in the justification and design of "Scroll To Top" buttons based on device class. As of 2025, more than 60% of global web sessions originate on mobile devices, with even higher percentages in certain regions and verticals.

Key contrasts:

• Mobile Challenges: On smartphones and tablets, returning to the top of a long page involves either rapid, repetitive swiping or a "tap status bar" gesture (where supported, such as iOS Safari). However, cross-browser inconsistency and user unfamiliarity mean that dedicated on-page controls are often preferred by a broad user base, especially on hybrid apps and mobile-optimized websites.
• Desktop Ergonomics: Mouse wheel, trackpad, and keyboard shortcuts (Home key, PgUp) make upward scrolling less arduous on desktop. For this reason, some designers consider the button less mission-critical on websites targeting desktop-first audiences, particularly those with concise page lengths or sticky headers.

A debated point is the exact threshold---measured in viewport heights or scroll depth---at which to display the button, and whether to make it persistent on mobile vs. conditional on desktop. Progressive web app studies and agency benchmarks suggest most best-in-class sites display the button after 2-4 viewport heights on mobile, and 3-5 on desktop, to balance discoverability with unobtrusiveness.

Emerging voice interface patterns and browser-level navigation cues may eventually obviate the need for the button altogether, but in 2025, its relevance on mobile remains especially pronounced---and often invoked as a "quick win" for measured UX improvement.

7. Alternative Navigation Patterns and Innovations

With the growth of scroll-rich web experiences, designers increasingly experiment with creative alternatives to the traditional "Scroll To Top" button. These innovations stem from both visual taste and a desire to differentiate.

Prominent patterns include:

• Persistent Mini-Menus: Floating buttons or bars with multiple navigation options (e.g., "Back to Top," "Jump to Section," contact, or chat icons) provide greater value and can suit content-dense portals.
• Gesture-based Shortcuts: On mobile, some sites use swipe-up gestures or pinch-to-zoom triggers to reinvoke top-of-page navigation; however, these have discoverability and accessibility drawbacks.
• Breadcrumb Trails and Sticky Nav Bars: Especially on documentation sites or SaaS dashboards, sticky navigation at the page top provides always-available context, reducing need for a dedicated scroll-back control.
• Animated Scroll Anchors: Engaging animated scroll paths and section indicators enable users to navigate between semantic page divisions---examples abound in the portfolios featured on Awwwards and Design Shack.
• Scroll Depth Indicators: Showing progress bars along one screen edge not only orients users within content but also sometimes doubles as a clickable control to jump back up.

Experimental navigation paradigms, while eye-catching, tend to supplement rather than supplant the more universally understood "Scroll To Top" button, which remains a baseline expectation for most users outside bespoke, avant-garde projects.

8. Technical Implementations: Code Snippets and Best Practices

Hundreds of JavaScript frameworks, vanilla snippets, and no-code widget solutions now exist for adding a "Scroll To Top" button. The most up-to-date how-tos (e.g., at W3Schools, Webflow, and MD Bootstrap) reflect several convergent technical best practices:

• Conditional Rendering: Only display the button after a threshold (typically, 300-600px from top), using event listeners to monitor scroll position.
• Smooth Scrolling: Leverage modern browser APIs (e.g., window.scrollTo({top: 0, behavior: 'smooth'})) for a visually pleasant transition, avoiding jarring jumps.
• ARIA and Focus Management: Integrate ARIA roles/labels and transfer focus to meaningful top-of-page element post-interaction.
• Performance Optimization: Debounce scroll event handlers to reduce CPU load, especially for animation-heavy or resource-constrained environments.
• Customizability: Allow for easy theme and placement tweaks to match site brand and layout.

A typical modern snippet, mirroring 2025 conventions, looks like this:

// Show/hide button
window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {
  if (window.scrollY > 400) {
    document.getElementById('backToTopBtn').style.display = 'block';
  } else {
    document.getElementById('backToTopBtn').style.display = 'none';
  }
});

// Scroll to top action with accessibility
document.getElementById('backToTopBtn').addEventListener('click', function() {
  window.scrollTo({ top: 0, behavior: 'smooth' });
  document.querySelector('header').focus(); // Or appropriate top element
});

More elaborate plugins, such as those from Elfsight or NiftyButtons, now let designers configure iconography, animation, ARIA compliance, and scroll thresholds through visual dashboards or low-code interfaces. Plugin marketplaces and blog roundups rank "accessibility-first" and "low-footprint" solutions highly for fast-moving, compliance-conscious web projects.

9. Impact on User Engagement, Metrics, and SEO

Quantitative analyses into the impact of "Scroll To Top" buttons on engagement produce consistently positive, if modest, effects. Sites implementing the feature often record improvements in:

• Average Session Duration: Eases exploration, particularly in deep or multi-section content.
• Scroll Depth and Recirculation: Encourages users to revisit content at the top (e.g., sticky offers, menus, or hero banners) without friction.
• Bounce Rate Reduction: Particularly for mobile users frustrated by excessive scrolling.

Digital analytics providers such as Contentsquare, TopmostAds, and FasterCapital document that after "Back to Top" deployment, there is measurable uplift in scroll depth and return navigation clicks, especially on long-form media sites and product listings. However, the effect on SEO is indirect: while Google and other search engines do not factor such UI elements in ranking, the cascading boosts in dwell time and interaction are widely thought to contribute to improved behavioral ranking signals.

A counterpoint, raised in some enterprise UX audits, is that improper or redundant deployment (e.g., overlapping with sticky nav, over-prominent buttons, or intrusive "scroll up" popups) can negatively impact both perceived site quality and actual usability metrics. This dynamic underscores the need for empirical A/B testing and user feedback, rather than reflexive inclusion.

10. Design Best Practices for "Scroll To Top" Buttons

Executed thoughtfully, the "Scroll To Top" button should align with both the site's brand language and accessibility needs. Leading design authorities and widget manufacturers publish the following best-practice principles:

• Subtle but Discoverable: Use contrasting icons (e.g., upward chevron/arrow), partial opacity, and fade-in animations so users notice the control only when relevant.
• Familiar Placement: Bottom right is standard for LTR (left-to-right) languages; keep padding from page edge to avoid overlap with chat, cookie, or support widgets.
• Accessible Labeling: Combine visible iconography with descriptive aria-label attributes for screen readers.
• Responsive Sizing: Proportion button dimensions to screen estate---larger on touch devices, smaller on spacious desktops.
• Animation Respects User Preference: Honor browser "reduce motion" preferences, offering an instant scroll mode for those sensitive to animation.
• Customizable Iconography: Select icons that align with the overall visual system, avoiding ambiguity. Modern best practice encourages explicit upward arrows or "chevrons" rather than abstract shapes.

These guidelines are reflected in the top-rated widgets of 2025 and are echoed in design agency best-practice roundups.

11. Case Studies and Examples: Usage on Popular Websites

To clarify how these principles play out in practice, it's instructive to examine several high-traffic and design-forward websites in 2025. The following table summarizes the presence or absence of the "Scroll To Top" feature on leading sites, accompanied by their rationale.

Table: "Scroll To Top" Usage on Popular 2025 Websites

Website	Uses "Scroll To Top"?	Rationale for Usage/Exclusion	Notes / Design Observations
Amazon.com	Yes	Long listings; improves mobile navigation	Icon appears after scrolling; smooth scroll; ARIA ready
The New York Times	Yes	Extensive scroll depth in articles; assists reader return	Floating on mobile; desktop visible after scroll
Facebook.com	No	Relies on persistent sticky headers and in-app tap shortcuts	Prioritizes minimal UI, sticky top nav always present
Wikipedia.org	Yes	Long encyclopedic entries; needed for top-nav and "edit" links	Text-based "Back to top" at page end and floating arrow on mobile
Behance.net	Yes	Deep portfolio pages; encourages content recirculation	Custom animated arrow, invisible at top
Apple.com	No	Uses sticky navigation bar and clear section anchors	No visible button; header always accessible
Medium.com	Yes	Long-form articles, encourages recirculation through suggested reading	Minimal arrow, appears at lower right post-scroll
Airbnb.com	No	Modular content, persistent top bar	No button observed in 2025
BBC.com	Yes	Long news stories, infinite scroll collections	Standard upward chevron; accessible labeling
Microsoft.com	No	Uses extensive anchor links, mega menu	No "Scroll To Top" button as of September 2025

This table illustrates that the decision is context dependent even among the most prominent web presences in 2025. Content-dense, scroll-heavy, or mobile-optimized sites overwhelmingly favor including the feature for both functional and analytics-driven reasons. Conversely, platforms with robust sticky/anchored navigation or modular layouts may safely omit the button in favor of top-level header access, particularly if their analytics suggest users rarely need to jump topward.

For instance, Amazon's and The New York Times' inclusion aligns with their deep-scroll content layouts and the need for ergonomic mobile navigation. Meanwhile, Facebook and Apple leverage fixed-position headers that supply all needed navigation, thereby reducing the necessity and visual redundancy of a separate button.

Behavioral data supports these choices; sites with frequent long-form content or infinite feeds see measurable increases in engagement upon adding well-implemented "Scroll To Top" controls. Conversely, user-testing on minimal or anchor-rich layouts demonstrates little incremental benefit.

12. Popular Widgets, Plugins, and Tools (2025 Snapshot)

A vibrant ecosystem of plugin and widget providers supports diverse codebases, from static HTML/CSS to React, Vue, and no-code platforms. The most cited solutions in 2025 include:

• Elfsight Back to Top Widget: Customizable, ARIA-ready, analytics-integrated; used on thousands of mid- to large-scale content sites.
• NiftyButtons Toolkit: Drag-and-drop UI for adding floating scroll utilities, with theme adaptation and accessibility by default.
• jQuery Back to Top Plugins: Still prevalent for legacy sites, offering smooth scroll with basic accessibility adjustments.
• Webflow / Wix / Squarespace Built-ins: No-code back-to-top elements, often accessible and easily repositioned; standard in many modern templates.

The competitive landscape for such widgets now prioritizes compliance with accessibility guidelines, animation smoothness, iconography customization, and integration with modern analytics packages.

13. Historical Evolution and Outlook for Obsolescence

The journey of the "Scroll To Top" button in web design mirrors the broader trajectory of user interface evolution. Its peak popularity coincided with the rise of long-form, single-page, and infinite-scroll experiences in the late 2010s and early 2020s. Early implementations were often intrusive---large, fixed-side controls distractingly ever-present at the page corner.

By 2025, the feature has undergone major refinements:

• From Persistent to Conditional: Visibility now triggered by scroll threshold, and auto-hiding by default.
• From Static to Animated/Branded: Transitions now smooth, harmonized with overall visual language.
• From Optional to Accessibility-Aware: Modern deployments almost universally tout ARIA compliance, keyboard support, and predictable focus behavior.

Despite this evolution, some commentators in web forums and professional communities believe the feature could see obsolescence as web design or device innovation advances further. They cite:

• Proliferation of Sticky Headers: Top navs are often one swipe away on modern sites.
• Gesture and Voice Navigation: Especially as browser and OS-level navigation becomes richer on mobile.
• Section-Based Navigation: Divides content into "cards" or modules, reducing need for page-spanning jumps.

That said, the continued existence of infinite-scroll and ultra-long "storytelling" layouts---in news, e-commerce, and wiki-style documentation---seems likely to ensure demand for the "Scroll To Top" pattern until a disruptive navigation paradigm emerges. The button's fate, in short, appears more evolutionary than terminal.

14. Summary: Continuing Relevance and Future Prospects

The "Scroll To Top" button as of 2025 remains neither a mandatory default nor a quaint relic. Its relevance survives through contextual adaptation, UI/UX innovation, and growing accessibility standards. The largest drivers of its continued use are:

• The persistence of long-form and infinite-scroll design, especially on mobile devices.
• The simplicity of cognitive mapping it provides in deep content structures.
• Analytics-supported improvements in engagement and reduced site abandonment where manual upward scrolling is otherwise taxing.

However, its status is increasingly conditional---most valued for content-rich and mobile-optimized applications, and less vital or even omitted on sites with sticky top navigation, anchor-rich interfaces, or modular page construction.

Design best practices increasingly favor subtlety, accessibility, responsive sizing, and animation smoothness. Developers and designers are guided by web-wide trend analyses, rigorous a/b testing, and user feedback as to when the button genuinely enhances, rather than detracts from, the UX.

As long as web content architectures feature lengthy, unbroken scroll experiences, and as long as device input variability remains, the "Scroll To Top" button's niche---even if limited---persists. Its implementation must, however, keep pace with broader movements in inclusive design, device innovation, and navigational clarity.

Conclusion

In 2025, the "Scroll To Top" button sits at the intersection of utility, design convention, and evolving web architectures. It stands as a case study in the importance of context-aware, data-driven UX decisions. For content-dense websites, especially in the media, documentation, and e-commerce spaces, it remains a valued navigational aid---one whose thoughtful deployment can tangibly improve the user experience and engagement. For short-form, anchor-linked, or heavily modular sites, it may now be superfluous, with modern navigation designs or device gestures picking up the slack.

Its ultimate fate will hinge not on designer preference alone, but on the continuing patterns of web content consumption and interaction---trends that remain, for now, reliably scroll-heavy. Whether the coming years will see its further mutation or eventual retirement, in 2025, the "Scroll To Top" button remains alive, purpose-driven, and at the heart of focused debates in UX and design communities.

I have to admit that I only skimmed the report, but two things stuck with me:

1. The "Scroll To Top" button is still in use, even though it's not like You Gotta Have One To Be Cool.
2. The relevance with long content is still there. Unless there is an easy navigation.

About the latter point: when I look at the book chapters, they can be quite long, and there is no easy navigation there. But as per @jvns' excellent work, the manual pages do have such an easy navigation.

For that reason, I think that we could probably remove the scroll-to-top button if we decide to let the book's navigation imitate the navigation of the manual pages, which is somewhat contrary to #2062 and even goes a bit further.

[To1ne]

Revert It If Necessary

Is there a sports brand with that slogan already?

The "Scroll To Top" button is still in use, even though it's not like You Gotta Have One To Be Cool.

For me it's more like "You're not cool if you have it". But what do I know about trends, I still prefer ankle socks over crew socks.

which is somewhat contrary to #2062 and even goes a bit further.

It's only about language selection, not chapter selection.

For that reason, I think that we could probably remove the scroll-to-top button

Agreed!

[dscho]

Revert It If Necessary

Is there a sports brand with that slogan already?

[Paulie-Aditya]

So the final consensus is that we should remove the scroll to top button and adjust according to feedback from users right?

[dscho]

So the final consensus is that we should remove the scroll to top button

I suppose so.

@schacon as the original author of the site, any final words?

[Paulie-Aditya]

[To1ne]

@Paulie-Aditya Let's commit to "Just Do It, and Revert It If Necessary".