Skip to content

Conversation

huangsen365
Copy link

@huangsen365 huangsen365 commented Aug 25, 2025

This patch updates Git's default branch name from 'master' to 'main' to align with modern naming conventions adopted across the industry.

The change affects only newly initialized repositories and maintains full backward compatibility through the existing init.defaultBranch configuration option.

Changes made:

  • refs.c: Update hardcoded default branch name to 'main'
  • remote.c: Update fallback branch name for remote operations
  • t/test-lib.sh: Update test suite default to 'main'

Compatibility notes:

  • Existing repositories are unaffected
  • Users can still set init.defaultBranch=master if preferred
  • The change only applies to new git init operations when no explicit branch name is configured

This follows the precedent set when init.defaultBranch configuration was introduced in Git 2.28, which already acknowledged the community's move toward more inclusive default branch names.

cc: Andreas Schwab [email protected]
cc: Phillip Wood [email protected]
cc: Jeff King [email protected]

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 25, 2025

There are issues in commit 8c1a30b:
rename default branch from 'master' to 'main' in refs and test scripts
Commit checks stopped - the message is too short
Commit not signed off

@huangsen365
Copy link
Author

/submit

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Error: Could not determine full name of huangsen365

1 similar comment
Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Error: Could not determine full name of huangsen365

@huangsen365
Copy link
Author

Error: Could not determine full name of huangsen365

I just updated my name now.

@huangsen365
Copy link
Author

/submit

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 25, 2025

There are issues in commit 8c1a30b:
rename default branch from 'master' to 'main' in refs and test scripts
Commit checks stopped - the message is too short
Commit not signed off

1 similar comment
Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 25, 2025

There are issues in commit 8c1a30b:
rename default branch from 'master' to 'main' in refs and test scripts
Commit checks stopped - the message is too short
Commit not signed off

Signed-off-by: Wing Huang <[email protected]>

	modified:   refs.c
	modified:   remote.c
	modified:   t/test-lib.sh
@huangsen365
Copy link
Author

/submit

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 26, 2025

Submitted as [email protected]

To fetch this version into FETCH_HEAD:

git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/ pr-1961/huangsen365/master-v1

To fetch this version to local tag pr-1961/huangsen365/master-v1:

git fetch --no-tags https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/ tag pr-1961/huangsen365/master-v1

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 26, 2025

Error: 6d89d0d was already submitted

@huangsen365
Copy link
Author

hi, bot, can you fix GitGitGadget PR HandlerFailing after 38s — Build #254288 failed ?

Copy link
Author

@huangsen365 huangsen365 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/submit

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 26, 2025

On the Git mailing list, Andreas Schwab wrote (reply to this):

On Aug 26 2025, Wing Huang via GitGitGadget wrote:

> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index 81d8fc017e1..ffc4089a1c2 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -2379,7 +2379,7 @@ struct ref *guess_remote_head(const struct ref *head,
>  			return copy_ref(r);
>  
>  		/* Fall back to the hard-coded historical default */
> -		r = find_ref_by_name(refs, "refs/heads/master");
> +		r = find_ref_by_name(refs, "refs/heads/main");

That comment is no longer accurate.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, [email protected]
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 26, 2025

User Andreas Schwab <[email protected]> has been added to the cc: list.

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 26, 2025

On the Git mailing list, Phillip Wood wrote (reply to this):

On 26/08/2025 05:52, Wing Huang via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Wing Huang <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Wing Huang <[email protected]>
> > 	modified:   refs.c
> 	modified:   remote.c
> 	modified:   t/test-lib.sh
> ---
>      rename default branch from 'master' to 'main' in refs and test scripts
>      >      This patch updates Git's default branch name from 'master' to 'main' to
>      align with modern naming conventions adopted across the industry.

Thank you for your interest in this. We're currently planning to change the default branch name when Git 3.0 is released as documented in Documentation/BreakingChanges.adoc. I've actually been working on some patches to do that at [1] which are almost ready to submit.

>       * refs.c: Update hardcoded default branch name to 'main'

Once we've done that we can also remove the advice about setting a default branch name.

>       * remote.c: Update fallback branch name for remote operations

I think we want to keep the fallback to "master" but check for "main" first. Otherwise we'll stop finding the default branch where the remote is still using master.

>       * t/test-lib.sh: Update test suite default to 'main'

GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is intended to aid the transition from master to main, once the branch name is changed it can be removed (with a little bit of work).

Thanks

Phillip

[1] https://github.com/git/git/compare/master...phillipwood:git:initial-branch-is-main

>      Compatibility notes:
>      >       * Existing repositories are unaffected
>       * Users can still set init.defaultBranch=master if preferred
>       * The change only applies to new git init operations when no explicit
>         branch name is configured
>      >      This follows the precedent set when init.defaultBranch configuration was
>      introduced in Git 2.28, which already acknowledged the community's move
>      toward more inclusive default branch names.
> > Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1961%2Fhuangsen365%2Fmaster-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1961/huangsen365/master-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1961
> >   refs.c        | 2 +-
>   remote.c      | 2 +-
>   t/test-lib.sh | 2 +-
>   3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
> index 4ff55cf24f6..929e9ce60c6 100644
> --- a/refs.c
> +++ b/refs.c
> @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ char *repo_default_branch_name(struct repository *r, int quiet)
>   		die(_("could not retrieve `%s`"), config_display_key);
>   >   	if (!ret) {
> -		ret = xstrdup("master");
> +		ret = xstrdup("main");
>   		if (!quiet)
>   			advise_if_enabled(ADVICE_DEFAULT_BRANCH_NAME,
>   					  _(default_branch_name_advice), ret);
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index 81d8fc017e1..ffc4089a1c2 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -2379,7 +2379,7 @@ struct ref *guess_remote_head(const struct ref *head,
>   			return copy_ref(r);
>   >   		/* Fall back to the hard-coded historical default */
> -		r = find_ref_by_name(refs, "refs/heads/master");
> +		r = find_ref_by_name(refs, "refs/heads/main");
>   		if (r && oideq(&r->old_oid, &head->old_oid))
>   			return copy_ref(r);
>   	}
> diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
> index 621cd31ae1d..4e273a6e94d 100644
> --- a/t/test-lib.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ fi
>   >   # Explicitly set the default branch name for testing, to avoid the
>   # transitory "git init" warning under --verbose.
> -: ${GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME:=master}
> +: ${GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME:=main}
>   export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
>   >   ################################################################
> > base-commit: 1fa68948c3d76328236cac73d2adf33c905bd8e3

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 26, 2025

User Phillip Wood <[email protected]> has been added to the cc: list.

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 26, 2025

On the Git mailing list, Jeff King wrote (reply to this):

On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 10:58:55AM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote:

> >       * remote.c: Update fallback branch name for remote operations
> 
> I think we want to keep the fallback to "master" but check for "main" first.
> Otherwise we'll stop finding the default branch where the remote is still
> using master.

I'm not sure we need to change anything there. Modern Git will generally
report the name of the branch pointed to by HEAD back to the client
(using either a symref capability in protocol v0 or the symref extension
to the ls-refs list in v2). So the fallback would be needed only for
very old servers, in which case "master" is probably a better guess.

IIRC, there are cases where v0 does not report the HEAD value when it
points to an unborn branch (and while I'd expect most Git servers to
always support v2 these days, sometimes the protocol upgrade fails due
to things like ssh blocking the GIT_PROTOCOL variable). But I don't
think that would affect the fallback code:

> > @@ -2379,7 +2379,7 @@ struct ref *guess_remote_head(const struct ref *head,
> >   			return copy_ref(r);
> >   		/* Fall back to the hard-coded historical default */
> > -		r = find_ref_by_name(refs, "refs/heads/master");
> > +		r = find_ref_by_name(refs, "refs/heads/main");
> >   		if (r && oideq(&r->old_oid, &head->old_oid))
> >   			return copy_ref(r);

since it is only about looking for the matching branch name, and not the
unborn case.

If we truly have an unborn HEAD on a very old server (with no protocol
support), I think we just end up without checking anything out, which
means HEAD would default to whatever the local client default is.

-Peff

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 26, 2025

User Jeff King <[email protected]> has been added to the cc: list.

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 26, 2025

On the Git mailing list, Phillip Wood wrote (reply to this):

On 26/08/2025 10:58, Phillip Wood wrote:
> On 26/08/2025 05:52, Wing Huang via GitGitGadget wrote:
>> From: Wing Huang <[email protected]>
>>
>>      rename default branch from 'master' to 'main' in refs and test >> scripts
>>      This patch updates Git's default branch name from 'master' to >> 'main' to
>>      align with modern naming conventions adopted across the industry.
> > Thank you for your interest in this. We're currently planning to change > the default branch name when Git 3.0 is released as documented in > Documentation/BreakingChanges.adoc. Oh, sorry it seems I imagined that. I've just checked and there is no entry in that document about the default branch name. I do think that the 3.0 release would be a good time to change the default branch name though.

Thanks

Phillip

@dscho
Copy link
Member

dscho commented Aug 26, 2025

hi, bot, can you fix GitGitGadget PR HandlerFailing after 38s — Build #254288 failed ?

That build failed because the patch was already submitted, i.e. it was correct that the build failed.

Copy link

gitgitgadget bot commented Aug 27, 2025

On the Git mailing list, Phillip Wood wrote (reply to this):

Hi Peff

On 26/08/2025 12:12, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 10:58:55AM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote:
> >>>        * remote.c: Update fallback branch name for remote operations
>>
>> I think we want to keep the fallback to "master" but check for "main" first.
>> Otherwise we'll stop finding the default branch where the remote is still
>> using master.
> > I'm not sure we need to change anything there. Modern Git will generally
> report the name of the branch pointed to by HEAD back to the client
> (using either a symref capability in protocol v0 or the symref extension
> to the ls-refs list in v2). So the fallback would be needed only for
> very old servers, in which case "master" is probably a better guess.
> > IIRC, there are cases where v0 does not report the HEAD value when it
> points to an unborn branch (and while I'd expect most Git servers to
> always support v2 these days, sometimes the protocol upgrade fails due
> to things like ssh blocking the GIT_PROTOCOL variable). But I don't
> think that would affect the fallback code:

Thanks for clarifying that

Phillip

>>> @@ -2379,7 +2379,7 @@ struct ref *guess_remote_head(const struct ref *head,
>>>    			return copy_ref(r);
>>>    		/* Fall back to the hard-coded historical default */
>>> -		r = find_ref_by_name(refs, "refs/heads/master");
>>> +		r = find_ref_by_name(refs, "refs/heads/main");
>>>    		if (r && oideq(&r->old_oid, &head->old_oid))
>>>    			return copy_ref(r);
> > since it is only about looking for the matching branch name, and not the
> unborn case.
> > If we truly have an unborn HEAD on a very old server (with no protocol
> support), I think we just end up without checking anything out, which
> means HEAD would default to whatever the local client default is.

I just tried cloning a repository with an unborn head and the clone >
> -Peff
> 

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants