Skip to content

[KOTS]: add ability to use custom workspace image stored in different private registry #11308

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
mrsimonemms opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon team: delivery Issue belongs to the self-hosted team

Comments

@mrsimonemms
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

Whilst working with @nandajavarma on custom workspace images, we discovered that you can use a private image but that it MUST be in the same registry as the workspace images are being stored in.

Describe the behaviour you'd like

  • Add "advanced" option in KOTS
  • Add option for "default workspace image" (defaulting to gitpod/workspace-full:latest)
  • Add option for registry credentials - these will then be appended to the registry secret, as per [kots]: allow multiple docker pull secrets #10685
  • The registry credentials will be validated by the preflight check

Describe alternatives you've considered

Insist upon either:

  • public image
  • private image stored in same registry as where workspace images are stored

Additional context

#8550 seems to be how it's done for SaaS, but this doesn't work for Self-Hosted. Also, it's likely to be desirable for this to be configured by the instance owner.

@mrsimonemms mrsimonemms added the team: delivery Issue belongs to the self-hosted team label Jul 12, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 12, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

1 similar comment
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 16, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon label Jan 16, 2023
@mrsimonemms mrsimonemms closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon team: delivery Issue belongs to the self-hosted team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant