Skip to content

[local-preview] Add Arm (and Mac M1) support #11309

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
Tracked by #9075
Pothulapati opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
Tracked by #9075

[local-preview] Add Arm (and Mac M1) support #11309

Pothulapati opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon self-hosted: local-preview

Comments

@Pothulapati
Copy link
Contributor

Pothulapati commented Jul 12, 2022 •
edited by lucasvaltl
Loading

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe

Currently, local-preview does not work on Arm platforms including Mac M1. There seems
to be a couple of reasons why

  • Support for k3s inside a docker container (Looks like we have to upgrade our k3s to latest)
  • Get our docker images built for arm platform

Doing the above things, Might also add support other devlces like raspberry PI, etc.

Describe the behaviour you'd like

Work on Mac M1 as it works on an Intel Mac.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context
@Pothulapati Pothulapati moved this from 📓Scheduled to 🧊Backlog in 🚚 Security, Infrastructure, and Delivery Team (SID) Jul 12, 2022
@lucasvaltl lucasvaltl mentioned this issue Jul 12, 2022
Closed
10 tasks
@zakariahmusic
Copy link

Duplicate of # #11552

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 20, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon label Feb 20, 2023
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Mar 19, 2023
@charleswhchan
Copy link

charleswhchan commented Mar 20, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Is this issue still valid given the recent release of the (experimental) Support for running x86-64 binaries with Rosetta 2?
docker/roadmap#384

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
meta: stale This issue/PR is stale and will be closed soon self-hosted: local-preview
Projects
No open projects
🚚 Security, Infrastructure, and Delivery Team (SID)
Status: ✨Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@charleswhchan @Pothulapati @zakariahmusic