Skip to content

[code] point code nightly back to gp-code/main branch #9877

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2022
Merged

[code] point code nightly back to gp-code/main branch #9877

merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2022

Conversation

jeanp413
Copy link
Member

@jeanp413 jeanp413 commented May 9, 2022

Description

Point code nightly back to gp-code/main branch

Release Notes

NONE

@jeanp413 jeanp413 requested a review from filiptronicek May 9, 2022 18:57
@jeanp413 jeanp413 requested a review from mustard-mh May 9, 2022 18:58
filiptronicek
filiptronicek approved these changes May 10, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@filiptronicek filiptronicek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but the Werft error will prevent this from being merged. I forgot what this one was, but I assume it's not related to the changes.

@filiptronicek
Copy link
Member

filiptronicek commented May 10, 2022 •
edited by werft-gitpod-dev-com bot
Loading

/werft run with-clean-slate-deployment=true

👍 started the job as gitpod-build-jp-nightly-main.2
(with .werft/ from main)

@roboquat roboquat merged commit 1658aad into main May 10, 2022
@roboquat roboquat deleted the jp/nightly-main branch May 10, 2022 07:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@filiptronicek filiptronicek filiptronicek approved these changes

@mustard-mh mustard-mh Awaiting requested review from mustard-mh

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
release-note-none size/XS
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@jeanp413 @filiptronicek @roboquat