-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.1k
all: decide how to spell the past tense of cancel #11626
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Both are acceptable in American English and British English. Just discourage the use of inflection(styling) - as cancellation doesn't seem to have an inflected variant. |
The key phrase in the issue opener was "be consistent". |
And that is why I suggested to discourage inflection, as cancellation doesn't seem to have an inflected form. All suffix forms of cancel would be consistent, with two l's. cancel, cancelled, cancelling, cancellation. But you also implied that one style was incorrect too- within that same sentence. And that is where I corrected you- both styles are correct and acceptable in both American English and British English. |
Looking at Google search results for |
Whatever you think I implied, what I said was, "check the dictionary". I wanted to be sure to be correct. Google searches are good at finding usage, and there are arguments that common usage is always correct, but if it's easy to obey what the dictionary claims is true, why not do that? |
Which dictionary do you mean though? The OED only has "cancelled", Mirriam-Webster says both "cancelled" and "canceled" are OK. My understanding is that "canceled" is predominant but not universal in the USA and not used in other English speaking countries (I find canceled looks wrong, but I grew up in the UK and live in NZ so that's not surprising). |
mwhudson: See issue #11626. :) |
I tried to make this clear as possible. Stating that both forms are ACCEPTABLE and CORRECT in both American English and British English. I am suggesting discourage inflection and use the long form, as cancellation doesn't seem to have an accepted inflected variant. And I am not talking about google searches of web pages, blogs, and such- I am strictly speaking about academia. As in my previous posts, I suggest using the long form so that all the suffixed variants of cancel are consistent. - cancel, cancelling, cancelled, cancellation. There are arguments for each side. I stated my opinion- not much else to argue. It boils down to the nitty gritty of taste. robpike will do what robpike does, its your task commander assignee. Interesting data sets can be produced using Ngrams: https://books.google.com/ngrams |
what you said was, "Both the gerund and the past participle of cancel appear with both one and with two l's. Be consistent and also correct. Check the dictionary." That statement implied that the use of suffixed forms of cancel were used in BOTH an inconsistent and incorrect manner. I merely corrected you by stating that both are acceptable, and now I'll add that, its a matter of taste. I am sorry I bruised your ego, it was not my intention to turn this into a pissing match. |
theckman suggested the use of short form. stating that cancelation seemed to be widely used. However this data set suggest otherwise: |
The OED only recognizes 'cancelled' which is the preferred spelling everywhere that isn't the US. All the other dictionaries I looked at (Merriam-Webster, American Heritage, wiktionary) list both 'canceled' and 'cancelled'. The ngram results discussed above as well as lots of other online sources suggest that 'canceled' is more prevalent in American usage and 'cancelled' is nigh-universal elsewhere. The AP style guide recommends 'canceled'. I'd say go with 'canceled':
|
@cespare I hadn't even thought to check other uses of words like that in the codebase. 👍 on 'canceled' |
I'd still like to point out that cancellation doesn't seem to have an inflected variant. using the long form keeps all suffixed forms consistent. As these forms could used in future documentation it may be prudent decision making. cancel, cancelling,cancelled, cancellation Also, one could make the argument that all forms of cancel, inflected or not, are so widely accepted that this nitpicking is futile. |
As I understand it However we decide, I'm sure we can all 👍 consistency. |
I've already made the argument that it is valid(widely accepted), however I also pointed out that its not widely used like the other inflected suffixed variants of cancel. But maybe this project can be a turning point for the use of cancelation. just a side note. my browsers spell checking doesn't recognized 'cancelation', however it accepts all other inflected suffixed variants of cancel. I'll check other spell checking software for the same behavior. even a google search suggests that 'cancelation' may be wrong, and suggests searching the term 'cancellation' instead. It doesn't behave the same with the other inflected variants of cancel. wiktionary makes a case for cancelation but doesn't cite anything. the discussion page mentions rules within the language forbidding the long form but again doesn't cite anything. So now I'm investigating such rules. however, using ngrams I have access to a data set with millions of entries that convey just the opposite. Like I said before, it is a matter of taste, I'm just making the argument for commonality among existing American/British English work. I really don't care what form is used, i just find this an interesting topic. It just happened to start in an issue regarding golang. |
Android uses a single |
CL https://golang.org/cl/24683 mentions this issue. |
We had ~30 one way, and these four new occurrences the other way. Updates #11626 Change-Id: Ic6403dc4905874916ae292ff739d33482ed8e5bf Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/24683 Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <[email protected]>
Both the gerund and the past participle of cancel appear with both one and with two l's. Be consistent and also correct. Check the dictionary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: