Closed
Description
@randall77 requested issue #27695 to be considered for backport to the next 1.10 minor release.
@gopherbot, please open a backport issue please.
This has been broken for a while, but it's a nasty bug. We should consider backporting it.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Relationships
Development
No branches or pull requests
Activity
gopherbot commentedon Sep 30, 2018
Change https://golang.org/cl/138586 mentions this issue:
[release-branch.go1.10] reflect: fix s390x reflect method calls
gopherbot commentedon Sep 30, 2018
Change https://golang.org/cl/138585 mentions this issue:
[release-branch.go1.10] reflect: ensure correct scanning of return values
gopherbot commentedon Sep 30, 2018
Change https://golang.org/cl/138584 mentions this issue:
[release-branch.go1.10] reflect: use correct write barrier operations for method funcs
gopherbot commentedon Oct 1, 2018
Change https://golang.org/cl/138587 mentions this issue:
[release-branch.go1.10] runtime: don't dereference 0-length bitvectors
dmitshur commentedon Nov 1, 2018
@randall77 This patch does not apply cleanly to
release-branch.go1.10
right now. If you still think this should be backported, can you please make a cherry-pick CL as described at https://golang.org/wiki/MinorReleases#making-cherry-pick-cls?We can also decide this doesn't meet the backport policy criteria, since there is a workaround (update to Go 1.11.1, where this issue is resolved).
Edit: I'll move the milestone to Go 1.10.6 since it's too late for Go 1.10.5 release that's happening today.
gopherbot commentedon Nov 2, 2018
Change https://golang.org/cl/147237 mentions this issue:
[release-branch.go1.10] reflect: ensure correct scanning of return values
bcmills commentedon Nov 19, 2018
@randall77, given the fix in 1.11 and the proximity to 1.12, is this still worth backporting to 1.10?
4 remaining items