Skip to content

database/sql: preallocate list slice in Drivers() #34602

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

julienschmidt
Copy link
Contributor

@julienschmidt julienschmidt commented Sep 30, 2019

The required slice capacity is already known. Thus, preallocate a slice with the correct capacity before appending to it.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Used by googlebot to label PRs as having a valid CLA. The text of this label should not change. label Sep 30, 2019
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR (HEAD: 2bf575b) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197917 to see it.

Tip: You can toggle comments from me using the comments slash command (e.g. /comments off)
See the Wiki page for more info

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Gobot Gobot:

Patch Set 1:

Congratulations on opening your first change. Thank you for your contribution!

Next steps:
Within the next week or so, a maintainer will review your change and provide
feedback. See https://golang.org/doc/contribute.html#review for more info and
tips to get your patch through code review.

Most changes in the Go project go through a few rounds of revision. This can be
surprising to people new to the project. The careful, iterative review process
is our way of helping mentor contributors and ensuring that their contributions
have a lasting impact.

During May-July and Nov-Jan the Go project is in a code freeze, during which
little code gets reviewed or merged. If a reviewer responds with a comment like
R=go1.11, it means that this CL will be reviewed as part of the next development
cycle. See https://golang.org/s/release for more details.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/197917.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Brad Fitzpatrick:

Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/197917.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Brad Fitzpatrick:

Patch Set 1: Run-TryBot+1


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/197917.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Gobot Gobot:

Patch Set 1:

TryBots beginning. Status page: https://farmer.golang.org/try?commit=de2e15f4


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/197917.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Gobot Gobot:

Patch Set 1: TryBot-Result+1

TryBots are happy.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/197917.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

gopherbot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2019
The required slice capacity is already known. Thus, preallocate a slice with the correct capacity before appending to it.

Change-Id: I45ac2c5f1701caeb3dda20451d371713ae7e7365
GitHub-Last-Rev: 2bf575b
GitHub-Pull-Request: #34602
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/197917
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <[email protected]>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <[email protected]>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <[email protected]>
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is being closed because golang.org/cl/197917 has been merged.

@gopherbot gopherbot closed this Sep 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes Used by googlebot to label PRs as having a valid CLA. The text of this label should not change.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants