-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Return rate limit information immediately after checkRateLimitBeforeDo
#572
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have one potential concern about this change.
I think it's somewhat unfortunate that we ended up being forced to create a fake/mock
*http.Response
even in situations where no remote HTTP request was actually made. I am referring to this.It was originally done in #347 because we (or I) didn't want to break clients that assumed
*http.Response
was nevernil
, since it used to never benil
in prior to that change.So I think it's somewhat disadvantageous that we would now be propagating the fake
*http.Response
in more situations.However, even if we had control over this, I'm not sure what's better. If a remote API request is not made (because we've predicted it'll fail due to exceeded rate limit), should the client be able to tell it apart from when a remote API request was made? It wasn't documented in the past, but one could've done that by checking if
resp
wasnil
. This changes that.I'm pointing out the above because I wanted to think it through. But I don't think it's a reason to avoid going with this change. This change actually increases consistency (in that we return
resp
andresp.Rate
in more cases).So, I think I'm okay with doing this, but I want to take another day to think it over. Meanwhile, I'd love to hear your perspective on the above @gmlewis.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You make excellent points and I have mixed feelings too. Please know that I am completely comfortable with the decision to simply revert the code changes and keep the updates to the documentation.
There is no urgency here so we can let this sit for some time in case others have opinions.