-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 710
haiku: add as known platform #9006
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
20f3825
to
fbb5136
Compare
The failure is expected, that test is supposed to fail with this kind of patch. To fix it you have to update the mismatched hash |
fbb5136
to
e76f54f
Compare
@fgaz ah thanks, have updated my commit to include the hash change, just couldn't find any documentation/comments on what it was, or how it should be generated to compare against. |
@Kleidukos this is a breaking change, we can't backport |
Ah, I had not realised. |
@fgaz thanks for pointing this out. I was confused myself and had to double-check: adding entities is not a breaking change but changing data types (even by simply adding a constructor) is. |
e76f54f
to
1c8afa1
Compare
Oops, I didn't see the merge conflict, updated :) |
22d9d8f
to
b57559e
Compare
@fgaz looks good to merge? :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me
@andreabedini i changed the label to squash instead of just merge, as the second commit doesn't make sense separately. |
Thank you @ulysses4ever |
Says it failed, but I can't see any actual failure? |
@mergify rebase |
✅ Branch has been successfully rebased |
533e783
to
315b080
Compare
@jessicah let me try to rebase and restart... |
315b080
to
07c6873
Compare
Rebased and squashed the change log commit, hopefully it passes again now... |
Do you know approximately when 3.12 will be released? Projects run |
@fgaz would it be possible to backport to 3.10/3.11 by using |
The `OSHaiku` identifier has been merged in haskell#9006, for a future 3.13 release. However, tools that rely on earlier versions of cabal -- such as hackage -- don't recognise "haiku" as a valid OS identifier. This allows packages with `os(haiku)` present to pass CI and be uploaded to hackage in the interim.
Please include the following checklist in your PR:
Bonus points for added automated tests!