Skip to content

Resolving issue #378- Check ValidationUtils for negative Susceptance #499

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jan 19, 2022

Conversation

Utkarsha-dev05
Copy link
Contributor

Adapting ValidationUtils and test data such that only negative values are allowed for the transformer susceptance.

… are allowed for the transformer susceptance.
@ckittl ckittl self-requested a review January 10, 2022 10:21
@ckittl ckittl requested a review from a team January 10, 2022 10:21
@ckittl ckittl added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 10, 2022
@ckittl ckittl added this to the Version 3.0 milestone Jan 10, 2022
@ckittl
Copy link
Member

ckittl commented Jan 10, 2022

Closes #378

@ckittl ckittl linked an issue Jan 10, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@ckittl ckittl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please additionally check the CI results. Currently some tests are broken.

@sonarqubegithubprchecks

This comment has been minimized.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #499 (bb8a6a1) into dev (89d894e) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                dev     #499      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     78.89%   78.88%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     2107     2106       -1     
============================================
  Files           263      263              
  Lines          8273     8275       +2     
  Branches        780      780              
============================================
+ Hits           6527     6528       +1     
- Misses         1345     1350       +5     
+ Partials        401      397       -4     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...atamodel/models/input/system/type/BmTypeInput.java 73.68% <0.00%> (-5.27%) ⬇️
.../models/input/thermal/CylindricalStorageInput.java 85.24% <0.00%> (-1.64%) ⬇️
...e3/datamodel/utils/validation/ValidationUtils.java 94.17% <0.00%> (-0.83%) ⬇️
...del/utils/validation/ConnectorValidationUtils.java 87.57% <0.00%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
...atamodel/models/input/system/type/EvTypeInput.java 73.68% <0.00%> (ø)
...tamodel/models/input/system/type/WecTypeInput.java 69.23% <0.00%> (ø)
...datamodel/io/naming/DefaultDirectoryHierarchy.java 93.96% <0.00%> (+0.86%) ⬆️
...tamodel/models/input/system/type/ChpTypeInput.java 73.07% <0.00%> (+3.84%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 497f7c8...bb8a6a1. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@ckittl ckittl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Generally looks good! Only some minor change requests regarding the documentation :-)

@sonarqubegithubprchecks

This comment has been minimized.

@sonarqubegithubprchecks

This comment has been minimized.

@sonarqubegithubprchecks

This comment has been minimized.

@sonarqubegithubprchecks

This comment has been minimized.

@ckittl ckittl self-requested a review January 19, 2022 07:17
@sonarqubegithubprchecks

This comment has been minimized.

@sonarqubegithubprchecks
Copy link

Passed

Analysis Details

0 Issues

  • Bug0 Bugs
  • Vulnerability0 Vulnerabilities
  • Code Smell0 Code Smells

Coverage and Duplications

  • 60 percent coverage88.89% Coverage (77.90% Estimated after merge)
  • 3 percent duplication0.00% Duplicated Code (0.20% Estimated after merge)

Project ID: edu.ie3:PowerSystemDataModel

View in SonarQube

@ckittl ckittl merged commit 03f669c into dev Jan 19, 2022
@ckittl ckittl deleted the uf/#378-Check-ValidationUtils-for-negative-Susceptance branch January 19, 2022 07:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Check ValidationUtils for negative Susceptance
2 participants