Skip to content

Conversation

RustedBones
Copy link
Contributor

Add scenario for testing USS availability status update conflict.

The 409 conflict code is not part of the official ASTM-UTM spec. This might need to be moved to interuss package.

@RustedBones RustedBones force-pushed the uss-qualifier-availability branch from b85bedd to 5f300f8 Compare August 28, 2025 15:13
@RustedBones
Copy link
Contributor Author

Run passed with a local image built with interuss/dss#1245

2025-08-28 15:17:57.927 | INFO     | monitoring.uss_qualifier.suites.suite:_run_test_scenario:155 - Running "ASTM Availability DSS: USS Availability Simple" scenario...
2025-08-28 15:17:57.940 | INFO     | monitoring.uss_qualifier.suites.suite:_run_test_scenario:173 - SUCCESS for "ASTM Availability DSS: USS Availability Simple" scenario

Copy link
Contributor

@Shastick Shastick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Somehow ended on this PR and did not realize it's still a draft: consider my comments as FYIs if you're still working on these things :)

@RustedBones RustedBones force-pushed the uss-qualifier-availability branch 2 times, most recently from 93bc25d to 43376c2 Compare September 9, 2025 12:56
get old version before updating availability

fix test check mismatch

fix doc OVN/version naming

record all queries

factorize fragments
@RustedBones RustedBones force-pushed the uss-qualifier-availability branch from debc331 to 552dc32 Compare October 1, 2025 13:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants