Skip to content

Conversation

jaraco
Copy link

@jaraco jaraco commented Jul 2, 2021

Alternate to #16 for bpo-44461.

This approach addresses the concern(s) I mentioned in python#26937 (review) but avoids the refactor I proposed in python#26992.

@jaraco
Copy link
Author

jaraco commented Jul 18, 2021

Superseded by upstream PR python#27227.

@jaraco jaraco closed this Jul 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant