Skip to content

Conversation

brettwooldridge
Copy link
Contributor

@brettwooldridge brettwooldridge commented Sep 26, 2025

Cleaner Revenge Tour 😄

Ok, this refactor leaves the doubly linked-list intact but tightens up the conditional logic around the node linking/unlinking, as well as reducing the method invocation overhead in some code paths. All-in-all an extremely minor refactor but seemingly does well in the JMH harness.

Tests run on a M1 Ultra Mac Studio.

High-memory high-threading (2x core count):

java -Xmx20g -jar target/benchmarks.jar -t 16 -i 5 -wi 6

5.18.0
Benchmark                Mode  Cnt       Score        Error  Units
MyBenchmark.testMethod  thrpt   25  550361.312 ± 452304.324  ops/s

5.19.0-SNAPSHOT
Benchmark                Mode  Cnt       Score        Error  Units
MyBenchmark.testMethod  thrpt   25  806701.763 ± 548298.436  ops/s

Lower-memory, threads matching core count:

java -Xmx16g -jar target/benchmarks.jar -t 8 -i 5 -wi 6

5.18.0
Benchmark                Mode  Cnt       Score        Error  Units
MyBenchmark.testMethod  thrpt   25  216233.155 ± 209346.033  ops/s

5.19.0-SNAPSHOT
Benchmark                Mode  Cnt       Score        Error  Units
MyBenchmark.testMethod  thrpt   25  313306.938 ± 324647.767  ops/s

Tests run on an Epyc 7402 Proxmox VM

High-memory high-threading (2x core count):

java -Xmx20g -jar target/benchmarks.jar -t 16 -i 5 -wi 6

5.18.0
Benchmark                Mode  Cnt        Score       Error  Units
MyBenchmark.testMethod  thrpt   25  1003122.171 ± 88700.984  ops/s

5.19.0-SNAPSHOT
Benchmark                Mode  Cnt        Score        Error  Units
MyBenchmark.testMethod  thrpt   25  1057712.282 ± 105237.902  ops/s

Lower-memory, threads matching core count:

java -Xmx16g -jar target/benchmarks.jar -t 8 -i 5 -wi 6

5.18.0
Benchmark                Mode  Cnt       Score       Error  Units
MyBenchmark.testMethod  thrpt   25   948151.717 ± 50740.821  ops/s

5.19.0-SNAPSHOT
Benchmark                Mode  Cnt        Score       Error  Units
MyBenchmark.testMethod  thrpt   25  1020379.664 ± 82178.334  ops/s

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant