-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
Issue #13290 - Consume WebSocket buffers in CoreSession.sendFrame #13643
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
lachlan-roberts
wants to merge
10
commits into
jetty-12.1.x
Choose a base branch
from
fix/jetty-12.1.x/13290/websocket-consume-buffers-sendFrame
base: jetty-12.1.x
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Issue #13290 - Consume WebSocket buffers in CoreSession.sendFrame #13643
lachlan-roberts
wants to merge
10
commits into
jetty-12.1.x
from
fix/jetty-12.1.x/13290/websocket-consume-buffers-sendFrame
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <[email protected]>
…1.x/13290/websocket-consume-buffers-sendFrame
sbordet
requested changes
Oct 15, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, beside the 2 simplifications.
...t-core-common/src/main/java/org/eclipse/jetty/websocket/core/internal/FragmentExtension.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...cket-core-common/src/main/java/org/eclipse/jetty/websocket/core/util/FragmentingFlusher.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Lachlan Roberts <[email protected]>
…1.x/13290/websocket-consume-buffers-sendFrame
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #13290
This reduces the number of times we do a
ByteBuffer.slice()
when sending a frame in WebSocket, now the buffer of the Frame is consumed after the call toCoreSession.sendFrame
.Currently this PR has the potential to impact users of Jetty / Jakarta WebSocket, as now the ByteBuffers sent with the sendBinary methods will consume the buffer.
But the Jakarta API now does specify that the container should consume the ByteBuffer (see discussion on jakartaee/websocket#209).