Add error returns to two API functions #336
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Master branch: c7655df |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/633442=>bpf-next
branch
from
01b8eb6 to
6d5f4c7
Compare
|
Master branch: 127e7dc |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/633442=>bpf-next
branch
from
6d5f4c7 to
3e62eb1
Compare
This adds an error return to the following API functions: - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type() - bpf_program__set_type() In both cases, the error occurs when the BPF object has already been loaded when the function is called. In this case -EBUSY is returned. Signed-off-by: Grant Seltzer <[email protected]>
This updates usage of the following API functions within libbpf so their newly added error return is checked: - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type() - bpf_program__set_type() Signed-off-by: Grant Seltzer <[email protected]>
This adds documentation for the following API functions: - bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type() - bpf_program__set_type() - bpf_program__set_attach_target() - bpf_program__attach() - bpf_program__pin() - bpf_program__unpin() Signed-off-by: Grant Seltzer <[email protected]>
|
Master branch: db69264 |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/633442=>bpf-next
branch
from
3e62eb1 to
2ab1937
Compare
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=633869 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2024
Add a test case which replaces an active ingress qdisc while keeping the miniq in-tact during the transition period to the new clsact qdisc. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_link [...] ./test_progs -t tc_link [ 3.412871] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 3.413343] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel #332 tc_links_after:OK #333 tc_links_append:OK #334 tc_links_basic:OK #335 tc_links_before:OK #336 tc_links_chain_classic:OK #337 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK #338 tc_links_dev_chain0:OK #339 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK #340 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK #341 tc_links_ingress:OK #342 tc_links_invalid:OK #343 tc_links_prepend:OK #344 tc_links_replace:OK #345 tc_links_revision:OK Summary: 14/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2024
Add a test case which replaces an active ingress qdisc while keeping the miniq in-tact during the transition period to the new clsact qdisc. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_link [...] ./test_progs -t tc_link [ 3.412871] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 3.413343] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel #332 tc_links_after:OK #333 tc_links_append:OK #334 tc_links_basic:OK #335 tc_links_before:OK #336 tc_links_chain_classic:OK #337 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK #338 tc_links_dev_chain0:OK #339 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK #340 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK #341 tc_links_ingress:OK #342 tc_links_invalid:OK #343 tc_links_prepend:OK #344 tc_links_replace:OK #345 tc_links_revision:OK Summary: 14/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2024
Add a test case which replaces an active ingress qdisc while keeping the miniq in-tact during the transition period to the new clsact qdisc. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t tc_link [...] ./test_progs -t tc_link [ 3.412871] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 3.413343] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel #332 tc_links_after:OK #333 tc_links_append:OK #334 tc_links_basic:OK #335 tc_links_before:OK #336 tc_links_chain_classic:OK #337 tc_links_chain_mixed:OK #338 tc_links_dev_chain0:OK #339 tc_links_dev_cleanup:OK #340 tc_links_dev_mixed:OK #341 tc_links_ingress:OK #342 tc_links_invalid:OK #343 tc_links_prepend:OK #344 tc_links_replace:OK #345 tc_links_revision:OK Summary: 14/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2024
Add three tests for struct_ops using private stack. ./test_progs -t struct_ops_private_stack #336/1 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack:OK #336/2 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_fail:OK #336/3 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_recur:OK #336 struct_ops_private_stack:OK The following is a snippet of a struct_ops check_member() implementation: u32 moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8; switch (moff) { case offsetof(struct bpf_testmod_ops3, test_1): prog->aux->priv_stack_requested = true; prog->aux->recursion_detected = test_1_recursion_detected; fallthrough; default: break; } return 0; The first test is with nested two different callback functions where the first prog has more than 512 byte stack size (including subprogs) with private stack enabled. The second test is a negative test where the second prog has more than 512 byte stack size without private stack enabled. The third test is the same callback function recursing itself. At run time, the jit trampoline recursion check kicks in to prevent the recursion. The recursion_detected() callback function is implemented by the bpf_testmod, the following message in dmesg bpf_testmod: oh no, recursing into test_1, recursion_misses 1 demonstrates the callback function is indeed triggered when recursion miss happens. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2024
Add three tests for struct_ops using private stack. ./test_progs -t struct_ops_private_stack #336/1 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack:OK #336/2 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_fail:OK #336/3 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_recur:OK #336 struct_ops_private_stack:OK The following is a snippet of a struct_ops check_member() implementation: u32 moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8; switch (moff) { case offsetof(struct bpf_testmod_ops3, test_1): prog->aux->priv_stack_requested = true; prog->aux->recursion_detected = test_1_recursion_detected; fallthrough; default: break; } return 0; The first test is with nested two different callback functions where the first prog has more than 512 byte stack size (including subprogs) with private stack enabled. The second test is a negative test where the second prog has more than 512 byte stack size without private stack enabled. The third test is the same callback function recursing itself. At run time, the jit trampoline recursion check kicks in to prevent the recursion. The recursion_detected() callback function is implemented by the bpf_testmod, the following message in dmesg bpf_testmod: oh no, recursing into test_1, recursion_misses 1 demonstrates the callback function is indeed triggered when recursion miss happens. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2024
Add three tests for struct_ops using private stack. ./test_progs -t struct_ops_private_stack #336/1 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack:OK #336/2 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_fail:OK #336/3 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_recur:OK #336 struct_ops_private_stack:OK The following is a snippet of a struct_ops check_member() implementation: u32 moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8; switch (moff) { case offsetof(struct bpf_testmod_ops3, test_1): prog->aux->priv_stack_requested = true; prog->aux->recursion_detected = test_1_recursion_detected; fallthrough; default: break; } return 0; The first test is with nested two different callback functions where the first prog has more than 512 byte stack size (including subprogs) with private stack enabled. The second test is a negative test where the second prog has more than 512 byte stack size without private stack enabled. The third test is the same callback function recursing itself. At run time, the jit trampoline recursion check kicks in to prevent the recursion. The recursion_detected() callback function is implemented by the bpf_testmod, the following message in dmesg bpf_testmod: oh no, recursing into test_1, recursion_misses 1 demonstrates the callback function is indeed triggered when recursion miss happens. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 13, 2024
Add three tests for struct_ops using private stack. ./test_progs -t struct_ops_private_stack #336/1 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack:OK #336/2 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_fail:OK #336/3 struct_ops_private_stack/private_stack_recur:OK #336 struct_ops_private_stack:OK The following is a snippet of a struct_ops check_member() implementation: u32 moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8; switch (moff) { case offsetof(struct bpf_testmod_ops3, test_1): prog->aux->priv_stack_requested = true; prog->aux->recursion_detected = test_1_recursion_detected; fallthrough; default: break; } return 0; The first test is with nested two different callback functions where the first prog has more than 512 byte stack size (including subprogs) with private stack enabled. The second test is a negative test where the second prog has more than 512 byte stack size without private stack enabled. The third test is the same callback function recursing itself. At run time, the jit trampoline recursion check kicks in to prevent the recursion. The recursion_detected() callback function is implemented by the bpf_testmod, the following message in dmesg bpf_testmod: oh no, recursing into test_1, recursion_misses 1 demonstrates the callback function is indeed triggered when recursion miss happens. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: Add error returns to two API functions
version: 4
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=633869