-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Roof MTU for switch #187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Master branch: d82a532 Pull request is NOT updated. Failed to apply https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bpf/list/?series=360467
conflict:
|
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2023
Add userland instruction dump and rename dump_kernel_instr() to dump_instr(). An example: [ 0.822439] Freeing unused kernel image (initmem) memory: 6916K [ 0.823817] Run /init as init process [ 0.839411] init[1]: unhandled signal 4 code 0x1 at 0x000000000005be18 in bb[10000+5fb000] [ 0.840751] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.14.0-rc4-00049-gbd644290aa72-dirty #187 [ 0.841373] Hardware name: , BIOS [ 0.841743] epc : 000000000005be18 ra : 0000000000079e74 sp : 0000003fffcafda0 [ 0.842271] gp : ffffffff816e9dc8 tp : 0000000000000000 t0 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.842947] t1 : 0000003fffc9fdf0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.843434] s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : 0000003fffca0190 a1 : 0000003fffcafe18 [ 0.843891] a2 : 0000000000000000 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.844357] a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.844803] s2 : 0000000000000000 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.845253] s5 : 0000000000000000 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.845722] s8 : 0000000000000000 s9 : 0000000000000000 s10: 0000000000000000 [ 0.846180] s11: 0000000000d144e0 t3 : 0000000000000000 t4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.846616] t5 : 0000000000000000 t6 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.847204] status: 0000000200000020 badaddr: 00000000f0028053 cause: 0000000000000002 [ 0.848219] Code: f06f ff5f 3823 fa11 0113 fb01 2e23 0201 0293 0000 (8053) f002 [ 0.851016] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000004 Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2024
When making BPF to BPF calls, the verifier propagates register bounds info for r0 from the callee to the caller. For example loading: #include <linux/bpf.h> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> static __attribute__((noinline)) int callee(struct xdp_md *ctx) { int ret; asm volatile("%0 = 23" : "=r"(ret)); return ret; } static SEC("xdp") int caller(struct xdp_md *ctx) { int res = callee(ctx); if (res == 23) { return XDP_PASS; } return XDP_DROP; } The verifier logs: func#0 @0 func#1 @6 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 ; int res = callee(ctx); @ test.c:15 0: (85) call pc+5 caller: R10=fp0 callee: frame1: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 6: frame1: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 ; asm volatile("%0 = 23" : "=r"(ret)); @ test.c:9 6: (b7) r0 = 23 ; frame1: R0_w=23 ; return ret; @ test.c:10 7: (95) exit returning from callee: frame1: R0_w=23 R1=ctx() R10=fp0 to caller at 1: R0_w=23 R10=fp0 from 7 to 1: R0_w=23 R10=fp0 ; int res = callee(ctx); @ test.c:15 1: (bc) w1 = w0 ; R0_w=23 R1_w=23 2: (b4) w0 = 2 ; R0_w=2 ; @ test.c:0 3: (16) if w1 == 0x17 goto pc+1 3: R1_w=23 ; } @ test.c:20 5: (95) exit processed 7 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0 And correctly tracks R0_w=23 from the callee through to the caller. This lets it completely prune the res != 23 branch, skipping over instruction 4. But this isn't sound if the callee makes a bpf_tail_call(): if the tail call succeeds, callee() will directly return whatever the tail called program returns. We can't know what the bounds of r0 will be. But the verifier still incorrectly tracks the bounds of r0, and assumes it's 23. Loading: #include <linux/bpf.h> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> struct { __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY); __uint(max_entries, 1); __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32)); __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32)); } tail_call_map SEC(".maps"); static __attribute__((noinline)) int callee(struct xdp_md *ctx) { bpf_tail_call(ctx, &tail_call_map, 0); int ret; asm volatile("%0 = 23" : "=r"(ret)); return ret; } static SEC("xdp") int caller(struct xdp_md *ctx) { int res = callee(ctx); if (res == 23) { return XDP_PASS; } return XDP_DROP; } The verifier logs: func#0 @0 func#1 @6 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 ; int res = callee(ctx); @ test.c:24 0: (85) call pc+5 caller: R10=fp0 callee: frame1: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 6: frame1: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 ; bpf_tail_call(ctx, &tail_call_map, 0); @ test.c:15 6: (18) r2 = 0xffff8a9c82a75800 ; frame1: R2_w=map_ptr(map=tail_call_map,ks=4,vs=4) 8: (b4) w3 = 0 ; frame1: R3_w=0 9: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 10: frame1: ; asm volatile("%0 = 23" : "=r"(ret)); @ test.c:18 10: (b7) r0 = 23 ; frame1: R0_w=23 ; return ret; @ test.c:19 11: (95) exit returning from callee: frame1: R0_w=23 R10=fp0 to caller at 1: R0_w=23 R10=fp0 from 11 to 1: R0_w=23 R10=fp0 ; int res = callee(ctx); @ test.c:24 1: (bc) w1 = w0 ; R0_w=23 R1_w=23 2: (b4) w0 = 2 ; R0=2 ; @ test.c:0 3: (16) if w1 == 0x17 goto pc+1 3: R1=23 ; } @ test.c:29 5: (95) exit processed 10 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 1 peak_states 1 mark_read 1 It still prunes the res != 23 branch, skipping over instruction 4. But the tail called program can return any value. Aside from pruning incorrect branches, this can also be used to read and write arbitrary memory by using r0 as a index. The added selftest fails without the fix: #187/p calls: call with nested tail_call r0 bounds FAIL Unexpected success to load Fixes: e411901 ("bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT") Signed-off-by: Arthur Fabre <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Roof MTU for switch
version: 2
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bpf/list/?series=360467