bpf: remove duplicate include #318
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Remove duplicate header which is included twice. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <[email protected]>
|
Master branch: f055f35 |
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=379491 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2021
…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 #311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 #314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2023
Add unit tests for new ldsx insns. The test includes sign-extension
with a single value or with a value range.
If cpuv4 is not supported due to
(1) older compiler, e.g., less than clang version 18, or
(2) test runner test_progs and test_progs-no_alu32 which tests
cpu v2 and v3, or
(3) non-x86_64 arch not supporting new insns in jit yet,
a dummy program is added with below output:
#318/1 verifier_ldsx/cpuv4 is not supported by compiler or jit, use a dummy test:OK
#318 verifier_ldsx:OK
to indicate the test passed with a dummy test instead of actually
testing cpuv4. I am using a dummy prog to avoid changing the
verifier testing infrastructure. Once clang 18 is widely available
and other architectures support cpuv4, at least for CI run,
the dummy program can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
yurinnick
pushed a commit
to yurinnick/kernel-patches-bpf
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2023
Add unit tests for new ldsx insns. The test includes sign-extension
with a single value or with a value range.
If cpuv4 is not supported due to
(1) older compiler, e.g., less than clang version 18, or
(2) test runner test_progs and test_progs-no_alu32 which tests
cpu v2 and v3, or
(3) non-x86_64 arch not supporting new insns in jit yet,
a dummy program is added with below output:
kernel-patches#318/1 verifier_ldsx/cpuv4 is not supported by compiler or jit, use a dummy test:OK
kernel-patches#318 verifier_ldsx:OK
to indicate the test passed with a dummy test instead of actually
testing cpuv4. I am using a dummy prog to avoid changing the
verifier testing infrastructure. Once clang 18 is widely available
and other architectures support cpuv4, at least for CI run,
the dummy program can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2023
Add unit tests for new ldsx insns. The test includes sign-extension
with a single value or with a value range.
If cpuv4 is not supported due to
(1) older compiler, e.g., less than clang version 18, or
(2) test runner test_progs and test_progs-no_alu32 which tests
cpu v2 and v3, or
(3) non-x86_64 arch not supporting new insns in jit yet,
a dummy program is added with below output:
#318/1 verifier_ldsx/cpuv4 is not supported by compiler or jit, use a dummy test:OK
#318 verifier_ldsx:OK
to indicate the test passed with a dummy test instead of actually
testing cpuv4. I am using a dummy prog to avoid changing the
verifier testing infrastructure. Once clang 18 is widely available
and other architectures support cpuv4, at least for CI run,
the dummy program can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2023
Add unit tests for new ldsx insns. The test includes sign-extension
with a single value or with a value range.
If cpuv4 is not supported due to
(1) older compiler, e.g., less than clang version 18, or
(2) test runner test_progs and test_progs-no_alu32 which tests
cpu v2 and v3, or
(3) non-x86_64 arch not supporting new insns in jit yet,
a dummy program is added with below output:
#318/1 verifier_ldsx/cpuv4 is not supported by compiler or jit, use a dummy test:OK
#318 verifier_ldsx:OK
to indicate the test passed with a dummy test instead of actually
testing cpuv4. I am using a dummy prog to avoid changing the
verifier testing infrastructure. Once clang 18 is widely available
and other architectures support cpuv4, at least for CI run,
the dummy program can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2024
Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: #320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: #344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: #345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: #346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: #490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
Commit d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") added upper bits zeroing to byteswap operations, but it assumes they will be already zeroed after rev32, which is not the case on some systems at least: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fixes: d63903b ("arm64: bpf: fix endianness conversion bugs") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
In case when is64 == 1 in emit(A64_REV32(is64, dst, dst), ctx) the generated insn reverses byte order for both high and low 32-bit words, resuling in an incorrect swap as indicated by the jit test: [ 9757.262607] test_bpf: #312 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.264435] test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 ret 1460850314 != -271733879 (0x5712ce8a != 0xefcdab89)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.266260] test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.268000] test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.269686] test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 jited:1 8 PASS [ 9757.271380] test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 ret -1460850316 != 271733878 (0xa8ed3174 != 0x10325476)FAIL (1 times) [ 9757.273022] test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe jited:1 7 PASS [ 9757.274721] test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 jited:1 9 PASS Fix this by forcing 32bit variant of rev32. Fixes: 1104247 ("bpf, arm64: Support unconditional bswap") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]> Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]> Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: bpf: remove duplicate include
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=379491