You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This PR focuses on modifying GraphQL queries related to disputes by changing the orderBy parameter from lastPeriodChange to disputeID in several queries.
Detailed summary
Added disputeID field to the DisputeDetails fragment.
Updated casesQueryWhere to order disputes by disputeID.
Updated casesQuery to order disputes by disputeID.
Updated myCasesQuery to order disputes by disputeID.
Updated myCasesQueryWhere to order disputes by disputeID.
✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Added disputeID field to dispute details
Refactor
Updated sorting of disputes to use disputeID instead of lastPeriodChange
The pull request introduces a modification to the GraphQL schema and query sorting mechanism in the cases-related queries. A new field disputeID has been added to the DisputeDetails fragment, and the orderBy parameter for several case-related queries has been updated to use disputeID instead of lastPeriodChange. This change impacts the sorting logic for dispute-related data retrieval, shifting the primary ordering criteria from the last period change to the dispute ID.
Changes
File
Change Summary
web/src/hooks/queries/useCasesQuery.ts
Added disputeID field to DisputeDetails fragment; Modified orderBy parameter in multiple queries from lastPeriodChange to disputeID
Poem
🐰 Disputes in line, now sorted neat
By ID they dance, a rabbit's treat
No more last period's fleeting sway
Dispute ID leads the sorting play
A change so crisp, so clean, so bright! 🔢
📜 Recent review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d298b9 and 15488d9.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
web/src/hooks/queries/useCasesQuery.ts (4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (16)
20-20: LGTM! Good addition of the disputeID field.
The addition of disputeID to the fragment is necessary for the new sorting mechanism while maintaining backward compatibility by keeping the lastPeriodChange field.
Line range hint 71-106: LGTM! Clean abstraction in hooks.
The hooks maintain a clean abstraction over the query details, requiring no changes despite the modification in sorting criteria. The default descending order and proper handling of undefined cases are preserved.
38-38: LGTM! Consistent update of sorting criteria across all queries.
The change from lastPeriodChange to disputeID has been consistently applied across all relevant queries.
Let's verify that we haven't missed any queries that need this update:
Also applies to: 46-46, 55-55, 65-65
✅ Verification successful
Different context: User profile queries can keep using lastPeriodChange
The remaining instances of lastPeriodChange are found in user profile-specific queries that serve a different purpose than the cases listing views. These queries are intentionally sorted by last period change to show users their disputes in order of recent activity, which is appropriate for this context.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash# Search for any remaining queries that might still use lastPeriodChange for sorting
rg -l 'orderBy: lastPeriodChange' --type ts
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash# Check the context of lastPeriodChange usage in useUser.ts
rg 'orderBy: lastPeriodChange' -B 5 -A 5 web/src/hooks/queries/useUser.ts
Length of output: 504
Line range hint 8-14: Verify GraphQL type generation.
Let's ensure the disputeID field is properly typed in the generated GraphQL types.
Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
Generate unit testing code for this file.
Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
@coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
PR-Codex overview
This PR focuses on modifying GraphQL queries related to disputes by changing the
orderByparameter fromlastPeriodChangetodisputeIDin several queries.Detailed summary
disputeIDfield to theDisputeDetailsfragment.casesQueryWhereto order disputes bydisputeID.casesQueryto order disputes bydisputeID.myCasesQueryto order disputes bydisputeID.myCasesQueryWhereto order disputes bydisputeID.Summary by CodeRabbit
disputeIDfield to dispute detailsdisputeIDinstead oflastPeriodChange