Skip to content

Note: Implementation uses explicit requestAnimationFrame calls [sticky] #796

Open
@krausest

Description

@krausest
Owner

(Severity: Code smell / cheating)
There were some discussions whether using requestAnimationFrame in client code is okay, a code smell or cheating.
Applying RAF for selected benchmark operations should be avoided and is considered cheating:
#166
#430

Using RAF for all operations in client code should be okay (that doesn't answer the question whether is's nice) since frameworks are allowed to use RAF under the covers too.

Activity

changed the title [-]Note: Implementation uses explicit requestAnimationFrame calls[/-] [+]Note: Implementation uses explicit requestAnimationFrame calls [sticky][/+] on May 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

        Participants

        @krausest

        Issue actions

          Note: Implementation uses explicit requestAnimationFrame calls [sticky] · Issue #796 · krausest/js-framework-benchmark