Skip to content

baremetal: Templating OSImage links through Tinkerbell workflow objects #1891

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

mohamed-rafraf
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

Enable OSImageURL templating in workflows to support different OS images for each hardware server, as machine-controller creates templates only once.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

What type of PR is this?

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change? Then add your Release Note here:

NONE

Documentation:

NONE

@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot added docs/none Denotes a PR that doesn't need documentation (changes). release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. dco-signoff: yes Denotes that all commits in the pull request have the valid DCO signoff message. sig/cluster-management Denotes a PR or issue as being assigned to SIG Cluster Management. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 2, 2025
@mohamed-rafraf
Copy link
Member Author

/assign

@mohamed-rafraf
Copy link
Member Author

/cherrypick release/v1.60

@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@mohamed-rafraf: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release/v1.60 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherrypick release/v1.60

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Member

@ahmedwaleedmalik ahmedwaleedmalik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 13, 2025
@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: c2f04e414e7e5962483e0b09e8045b613fa83b0d

@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahmedwaleedmalik

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 13, 2025
@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot merged commit d6ee7f4 into kubermatic:main Jan 13, 2025
12 checks passed
@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@mohamed-rafraf: new pull request created: #1895

In response to this:

/cherrypick release/v1.60

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Denotes that all commits in the pull request have the valid DCO signoff message. docs/none Denotes a PR that doesn't need documentation (changes). lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cluster-management Denotes a PR or issue as being assigned to SIG Cluster Management. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants