Skip to content

🌱 add preWatch options for leader-elections runnables to reduce failover time when leader changes #2005

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nicktming
Copy link

What does this do, and why do we need it?

As we know leader-elections runnables only have one working instance, when the leader instance changes, the new leader should watch all resources;

The problem is that watching resources takes long time in the big clusters, and this will have a affect for components who cares about the failover time。

This PR is used to provide a preWatch option for leader-election runnables to preWatch kubernetes resources (it does not handle resource events) for instances which does not acquire leader, when the instance become leader, it starts to process events;

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 17, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @nicktming. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nicktming
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mengqiy for approval by writing /assign @mengqiy in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 17, 2022
@nicktming
Copy link
Author

/cc @mengqiy @varshaprasad96

@nicktming
Copy link
Author

Hey @mengqiy @varshaprasad96, what do you think?

thanks for your suggestions.

@nicktming
Copy link
Author

Hey @mengqiy @varshaprasad96 , what do you think?

@@ -316,6 +319,12 @@ type Runnable interface {
Start(context.Context) error
}

// runnable with preWatch resources
type RunnableWithPreWatch interface {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really understand why this would be needed. We already have the LeaderElectionRunnable interace to start thigns before the leader lock was acquired:

type LeaderElectionRunnable interface {

Moreover, we start the cache before we start anything else:

if err := cm.runnables.Caches.Start(cm.internalCtx); err != nil {

We don't star the Source itself which might lead to us not getting an informer which then might mean we don't actually start a watch. But changing that is probably a breaking change, as it will lead to increased memory consumption on non-leader instances.

Copy link
Author

@nicktming nicktming Oct 14, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@alvaroaleman thanks for the discussion。

it has the obvious problem that it will lead to increased memory consumption on non-leader instances, so i provider one option for users who need this feature. users can enable this feature when it is helpful for them.

in our env(big clusters) and when leader changes, it takes too long time to list resources from apiserver, so we want to save failover time by memory consumption.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 24, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@nicktming: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 17, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 16, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this PR with /reopen
  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants