Skip to content

Add support for kind/regression #1232

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2020
Merged

Add support for kind/regression #1232

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2020

Conversation

saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

The new kind/regression will now be added to the "Other (...)" category
as well.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

- Added support for kind/regression on release notes generation

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-priority size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject labels Apr 7, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from jeefy and puerco April 7, 2020 11:01
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 7, 2020
Copy link
Member

@justaugustus justaugustus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@saschagrunert -- I'm inclined to suggest that maybe regressions should have their own section instead of being bundled in Other...

Thoughts @liggitt @tpepper @kubernetes/release-engineering?
/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 7, 2020
@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Apr 7, 2020

I'd group fixed regressions under bugs in release notes. The distinction doesn't seem that important here.

The new kind/regression will now be added to the "Other (...)" category
as well.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

Alright, I merged "Bug" and "Regression" into a new section, ready for review again :)

Copy link
Member

@cpanato cpanato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold for Stephen review as well

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 8, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@hasheddan hasheddan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve
/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cpanato, hasheddan, justaugustus, saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit c9a3181 into kubernetes:master Apr 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.19 milestone Apr 9, 2020
@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the kind-regression branch April 10, 2020 07:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants