feat: add get_current_step getter

[dorimedini-starkware]

Add get_current_step getter

Description

To implement the OsLogger in the Starknet OS, access to the current step is required.

Checklist

• Linked to Github Issue
• Unit tests added
• Integration tests added.
• This change requires new documentation.
  • Documentation has been added/updated.
  • CHANGELOG has been updated.

[github-actions]

**Hyper Thereading Benchmark results**




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 1" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.432 s ±  0.002 s    [User: 25.591 s, System: 0.838 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.430 s … 26.433 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 1
  Time (mean ± σ):     26.650 s ±  0.020 s    [User: 25.798 s, System: 0.848 s]
  Range (min … max):   26.636 s … 26.664 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 1 ran
    1.01 ± 0.00 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 1




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 2" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=2 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.708 s ±  0.037 s    [User: 25.698 s, System: 0.851 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.682 s … 14.735 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 2
  Time (mean ± σ):     14.870 s ±  0.156 s    [User: 25.980 s, System: 0.870 s]
  Range (min … max):   14.760 s … 14.981 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 2 ran
    1.01 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 2




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 4" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.702 s ±  0.370 s    [User: 37.996 s, System: 1.025 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.440 s … 10.964 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 4
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.367 s ±  0.347 s    [User: 38.332 s, System: 1.022 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.121 s … 10.613 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_pr threads: 4 ran
    1.03 ± 0.05 times faster than hyper_threading_main threads: 4




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 6" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=6 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.669 s ±  0.049 s    [User: 38.147 s, System: 1.029 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.634 s … 10.704 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 6
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.781 s ±  0.527 s    [User: 38.368 s, System: 1.018 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.408 s … 11.153 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 6 ran
    1.01 ± 0.05 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 6




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 8" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=8 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.442 s ±  0.041 s    [User: 38.512 s, System: 1.036 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.413 s … 10.471 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 8
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.458 s ±  0.136 s    [User: 38.484 s, System: 1.045 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.361 s … 10.554 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 8 ran
    1.00 ± 0.01 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 8




hyperfine -r 2 -n "hyper_threading_main threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_main' -n "hyper_threading_pr threads: 16" 'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=16 ./hyper_threading_pr'
Benchmark 1: hyper_threading_main threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.379 s ±  0.093 s    [User: 39.060 s, System: 1.156 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.313 s … 10.445 s    2 runs
 
Benchmark 2: hyper_threading_pr threads: 16
  Time (mean ± σ):     10.434 s ±  0.164 s    [User: 38.913 s, System: 1.158 s]
  Range (min … max):   10.317 s … 10.550 s    2 runs
 
Summary
  hyper_threading_main threads: 16 ran
    1.01 ± 0.02 times faster than hyper_threading_pr threads: 16

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results for unmodified programs 🚀

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_factorial	2.123 ± 0.012	2.113	2.152	1.00
head big_factorial	2.137 ± 0.030	2.118	2.221	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base big_fibonacci	2.058 ± 0.022	2.040	2.100	1.00 ± 0.01
head big_fibonacci	2.054 ± 0.017	2.039	2.091	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.521 ± 0.025	7.483	7.558	1.00
head blake2s_integration_benchmark	7.592 ± 0.124	7.459	7.744	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base compare_arrays_200000	2.196 ± 0.071	2.157	2.396	1.01 ± 0.03
head compare_arrays_200000	2.167 ± 0.006	2.158	2.178	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base dict_integration_benchmark	1.436 ± 0.002	1.433	1.439	1.00
head dict_integration_benchmark	1.447 ± 0.008	1.439	1.465	1.01 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.212 ± 0.004	1.203	1.216	1.00
head field_arithmetic_get_square_benchmark	1.212 ± 0.004	1.205	1.216	1.00 ± 0.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base integration_builtins	7.567 ± 0.019	7.529	7.597	1.00
head integration_builtins	7.619 ± 0.113	7.562	7.938	1.01 ± 0.02

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base keccak_integration_benchmark	7.884 ± 0.061	7.833	8.045	1.01 ± 0.01
head keccak_integration_benchmark	7.843 ± 0.032	7.805	7.907	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base linear_search	2.169 ± 0.023	2.147	2.228	1.00 ± 0.01
head linear_search	2.168 ± 0.017	2.144	2.200	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.528 ± 0.008	1.519	1.544	1.00
head math_cmp_and_pow_integration_benchmark	1.530 ± 0.016	1.518	1.573	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base math_integration_benchmark	1.472 ± 0.007	1.464	1.487	1.00 ± 0.01
head math_integration_benchmark	1.469 ± 0.005	1.462	1.479	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base memory_integration_benchmark	1.221 ± 0.010	1.212	1.248	1.00 ± 0.01
head memory_integration_benchmark	1.216 ± 0.003	1.212	1.220	1.00

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.583 ± 0.010	1.571	1.608	1.00
head operations_with_data_structures_benchmarks	1.584 ± 0.004	1.579	1.592	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base pedersen	533.3 ± 5.5	530.2	548.7	1.00 ± 0.01
head pedersen	533.0 ± 2.2	530.2	536.8	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base poseidon_integration_benchmark	632.4 ± 3.8	624.2	636.5	1.00
head poseidon_integration_benchmark	634.0 ± 2.1	630.2	636.6	1.00 ± 0.01

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base secp_integration_benchmark	1.870 ± 0.007	1.862	1.887	1.00 ± 0.00
head secp_integration_benchmark	1.861 ± 0.006	1.853	1.869	1.00

Command	Mean [ms]	Min [ms]	Max [ms]	Relative
base set_integration_benchmark	676.3 ± 26.7	662.1	751.5	1.00
head set_integration_benchmark	692.9 ± 55.7	660.2	823.3	1.02 ± 0.09

Command	Mean [s]	Min [s]	Max [s]	Relative
base uint256_integration_benchmark	4.233 ± 0.027	4.199	4.293	1.01 ± 0.01
head uint256_integration_benchmark	4.207 ± 0.020	4.185	4.252	1.00

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.54%. Comparing base (7b9e1c5) to head (48278c1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2034   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.54%   96.54%           
=======================================
  Files         102      102           
  Lines       42788    42791    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        41309    41312    +3     
  Misses       1479     1479           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[JulianGCalderon]

LGTM