test(l1): add storage slot reorg test

[MegaRedHand]

Blocked by #4620

Motivation

The main components of chain state are account balance and contract storage. Testing reorgs affect those as expected is important.

Description

This PR adds a reorg test using a simple contract that sets a storage slot as received by calldata.

NOTE: this is currently failing due to issues with full-sync header requests

[github-actions]

Lines of code report

Total lines added: 165
Total lines removed: 0
Total lines changed: 165

Detailed view

+----------------------------------------+-------+------+
| File                                   | Lines | Diff |
+----------------------------------------+-------+------+
| ethrex/tooling/reorgs/src/main.rs      | 224   | +76  |
+----------------------------------------+-------+------+
| ethrex/tooling/reorgs/src/simulator.rs | 448   | +89  |
+----------------------------------------+-------+------+

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Adds a storage slot reorg test to verify that contract storage state is properly handled during blockchain reorganizations. The test deploys a simple contract that sets storage slots based on calldata parameters and verifies that different storage values are correctly maintained across divergent chains.

Key changes:

• Enhanced simulator with test-specific data directory structure and contract deployment/interaction methods
• Added new reorg test that verifies storage slot consistency across chain forks
• Added utility methods for contract deployment and storage querying

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File	Description
tooling/reorgs/src/simulator.rs	Added test name parameter, contract interaction methods, and test-specific data directories
tooling/reorgs/src/main.rs	Added new storage slot reorg test function and integrated it into test runner

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

tooling/reorgs/src/simulator.rs:1

• [nitpick] The calldata construction using to_big_endian() and concat() creates intermediate allocations. Consider using a more efficient approach like pre-allocating a 64-byte array and copying the values directly.

use std::{fs::File, io::Read, path::PathBuf, process::Stdio, time::Duration};

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}