Skip to content

tests(schemaview): optimize execution #394

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Silvanoc
Copy link
Contributor

@Silvanoc Silvanoc commented May 19, 2025

Avoid creating SchemaView of the same schema 9 times for very similar tests.

Avoid opening the same schema 9 times for very similar tests.

Signed-off-by: Silvano Cirujano Cuesta <[email protected]>
@Silvanoc Silvanoc force-pushed the improve-test-performance branch from 184ff54 to 19faa36 Compare May 19, 2025 12:14
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.79%. Comparing base (b2206a4) to head (19faa36).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #394   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.79%   63.79%           
=======================================
  Files          63       63           
  Lines        8938     8938           
  Branches     2584     2584           
=======================================
  Hits         5702     5702           
  Misses       2629     2629           
  Partials      607      607           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Silvanoc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tiny improvement on changes introduced by @ialarmedalien on this commit, therefore adding him as reviewer.

@ialarmedalien
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Tag me when you convert the PR to non-draft status so I can approve.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants