Skip to content

Conversation

nbsp
Copy link
Contributor

@nbsp nbsp commented Dec 7, 2024

while writing this patch, i found that using bun test instead of vitest is much much (up to 100x) faster. i know we don't explicitly target Bun but it might be worth using it in our CI for testing instead of vitest, especially with later integration tests.

24-12-07-021632

@nbsp nbsp requested a review from lukasIO December 7, 2024 00:19
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 7, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 8a35eab

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@livekit/agents Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@nbsp nbsp requested a review from theomonnom December 7, 2024 00:48
"@livekit/agents": patch
---

add tests + fix tokenizer
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should the tests bit be part of the changelog?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nope, fixing

@nbsp nbsp merged commit 2243fbd into next Dec 10, 2024
5 checks passed
@nbsp nbsp deleted the nbsp/test/tokenizer branch December 10, 2024 10:10
nbsp added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants